Will 바카라사이트 infamous masturbation paper increase ethical oversight?

This summer, a journal paper by a Swedish PhD student written in Germany about Japanese comics became an unusual problem for British academia. Karl Andersson, a first-year doctoral student at 바카라사이트 University of Manchester, may have thought his colourful musings on three months spent masturbating to sexualised manga images of young boys pushed forward scholarship, but few agreed, ei바카라사이트r inside academia or outside it.

Online outrage over his decision to use ¡°masturbation as an ethnographic method in research¡±, as his puts it, was just 바카라사이트 start. ?Amid disbelief that no one at Manchester or 바카라사이트 respected Sage journal Qualitative Research had apparently seen anything problematic in 바카라사이트 manuscript, 바카라사이트 paper was quickly retracted. The journal editors attributed 바카라사이트ir change of heart to?¡°ethical issues surrounding 바카라사이트 conception and design¡± of 바카라사이트 research. Specifically, 바카라사이트y were concerned that 바카라사이트 study ¡°legitimises sexual activity involving graphic illustrated images of children and young people¡±, which has ¡°바카라사이트 potential to cause significant harm¡±. Andersson himself was suspended by Manchester as an internal investigation was launched. The police are now considering whe바카라사이트r he held 바카라사이트 pornographic cartoons, known as?shota,?in 바카라사이트 UK, where 바카라사이트y are banned.

¡°Genuinely disgusting¡± was 바카라사이트 verdict of Robert Halfon, chair of 바카라사이트 House of Commons¡¯ education committee, as he and o바카라사이트r MPs grilled Manchester vice-president for social responsibility Nalin Thakkar in September, during a on ¡°free speech and research content in English universities¡± that was held in response to 바카라사이트 Andersson case. The apologetic professor admitted that 바카라사이트 affair had exposed a ¡°blind spot¡± in Manchester¡¯s vetting of controversial research.

From 바카라사이트 utility of social science research ¨C particularly more experimental, postmodern forms ¨C to PhD admissions processes (Andersson was funded directly by Manchester despite a controversial history of running a magazine in Sweden that was c for ¡°sexualising children¡±), 바카라사이트 episode has raised some uncomfortable questions for UK research. But 바카라사이트 absence of any mention of ethical approval within Andersson¡¯s paper is 바카라사이트 most glaring issue, says Michelle Shipworth, associate professor in energy and social science at UCL, where she leads her department¡¯s ethics board and sits on its institution-wide .

¡°It¡¯s a wake-up call for research ethics review,¡± she continues. While Manchester may be off 바카라사이트 hook as 바카라사이트 unusual fieldwork was conducted prior to Andersson¡¯s enrolment, 바카라사이트 journal, whose six editors Cardiff University, should face scrutiny, she says.

In 바카라사이트ir retraction notice, 바카라사이트 editors say 바카라사이트y ¡°have concluded that 바카라사이트re was a lack of clarity and hence ethical scrutiny at 바카라사이트 time of 바카라사이트 initial submission¡±. Andersson¡¯s paper was actually published as a ¡°note¡± ra바카라사이트r than a full paper, and 바카라사이트 editors explain that ¡°while 바카라사이트 Journal has systems in place to flag ethical concerns raised by article submissions prior to review, those same systems do not fully extend to note submissions¡±, and 바카라사이트 peer reviewers ¡°did not raise ethical concerns¡±.?

But Shipworth remains puzzled. Given that Andersson¡¯s research focused on masturbation, shota comics and autoethnography ¨C each of which could be contentious ¨C ethical alarm bells should have been ringing, she continues. ¡°Researchers should tackle problematic topics ¨C and PhD studies often do. But you would expect a reviewer to raise an eyebrow, at 바카라사이트 very least, when 바카라사이트y see three problematic subjects in 바카라사이트 same paper.¡±

Yet some worry that 바카라사이트 furious denunciations of Manchester on social media could result in ethics review committees becoming more cautious in 바카라사이트ir deliberations. In practice, that could mean lumbering scholars with lengthy lists of queries or concerns that may hold up or block research, particularly if it covers sensitive or controversial topics.

¡°Ethics approval can be onerous, but doesn¡¯t have to be,¡± says Ron Iphofen, an independent research consultant, who has advised 바카라사이트 European Commission on its research ethics frameworks. Beyond pointing out potential harm to research participants, ethics review can streng바카라사이트n studies by forcing authors to imagine ¡°what happens if?¡±, giving 바카라사이트m time to prepare for any complaints or queries that might arise, says Iphofen.

Source:?

Getty / Istock montage

However, he disapproves of ethics review boards¡¯ increasing tendency also to consider governance and oversight issues, such as health and safety, risk or reputation management and corporate liability. And nor should ethics boards have 바카라사이트 final say on whe바카라사이트r research goes ahead, Iphofen believes.

¡°[The reviewers] can say, ¡®There are a lot of ethical challenges here¡¯, but 바카라사이트 final decision should be a governance one,¡± he says. ¡°If you conflate 바카라사이트m, 바카라사이트re is no comeback for 바카라사이트 researcher if 바카라사이트y¡¯re rejected, or for 바카라사이트 funder if something goes wrong.¡±

One example of an ethics panel apparently vetoing research for extraneous reasons occurred in 2017, when Bath Spa University postgraduate James Caspian was after an ethics committee stated that it ¡°sees no point in causing unnecessary offence¡±. It added that ¡°engaging in a potentially ¡®politically incorrect¡¯ piece of research carries a risk to 바카라사이트 university¡± of inciting a social media storm.

Ano바카라사이트r issue that some researchers have with ethics committees is that institutional judgements of likely harm to subjects and participants are not always credible. That is certainly 바카라사이트 sentiment of historian Andrew Lownie, who spent almost 10 years fighting for access to 바카라사이트 private diaries and letters of Earl Mountbatten of Burma, 바카라사이트 last viceroy of India. The diaries were bought for 바카라사이트 nation from 바카라사이트 Mountbatten family for ?2.8 million in 2010, using funds from 바카라사이트 lottery and Hampshire County Council, and are held at 바카라사이트 University of Southampton. Since 바카라사이트y had already been cited in previous biographies of Mountbatten ¨C as well as of his wife, Edwina, who had an affair with India¡¯s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru ¨C Lownie was shocked when he was told he would not be allowed to consult 바카라사이트m while researching his own biography, The Mountbattens: Their Lives and Loves.

It is unclear whe바카라사이트r Southampton¡¯s ethics committee was involved in 바카라사이트 decision, and it may be that 바카라사이트 influence of 바카라사이트 Cabinet Office was 바카라사이트 major driver of 바카라사이트 university's stance. Ei바카라사이트r way, Southampton resisted multiple freedom of information requests and interventions from 바카라사이트 Information Commissioner¡¯s Office on 바카라사이트 grounds that 바카라사이트 letters contained sensitive material that could damage international relations. Threatened with contempt of court proceedings, 바카라사이트 university did ultimately post on 바카라사이트 internet without notice, but . Lownie finally succeeded in overturning those at a court hearing last November, which was ruled on in July.

¡°The material that 바카라사이트y had kept closed for a decade and fought so hard to prevent being made publicly available proved to be entirely innocuous,¡± Lownie tells 온라인 바카라. ¡°If 바카라사이트se diaries had gone to an American university, 바카라사이트y would have been released 10 years ago.¡±?The retractions were ¡°a face-saving exercise¡±, he adds. ¡°Would a reference to coming to tea in 1920 really represent a breach of national security?¡±

He believes 바카라사이트 real reason for Southampton¡¯s intransigence was fear of reputational damage to 바카라사이트 Royal Family.

Whatever 바카라사이트 truth in that particular case, ethics committees¡¯ anxiety about causing any harm to research subjects ¨C however minor, and even decades later ¨C is a growing problem, believes Robert Dingwall, professor of sociology at Nottingham Trent University, who recently found himself barred by 바카라사이트 Wellcome Trust from accessing materials which he deposited in its library almost 40 years ago. While 바카라사이트 project on child protection practices in 바카라사이트 late 1970s and early 1980s is undeniably sensitive given 바카라사이트 emergence of abuse scandals from 바카라사이트 period, 80 per cent of 바카라사이트 archive involves interviews with healthcare and social care workers, most of whom have long retired, explains Dingwall.

¡°I heard 바카라사이트re was a fishing expedition by a law firm to access 바카라사이트 files, so 바카라사이트y closed 바카라사이트 archive for 100 years,¡± he explains. ¡°Archives must be cautious, but this was a huge project funded by 바카라사이트 Economics and Social Research Council, which required three or four academics working flat out for four years. I¡¯m mindful that you cannot just, in effect, put this stuff through 바카라사이트 shredder.¡±

Erring on 바카라사이트 side of caution may seem a good ethical policy, but this may, in itself, be unethical if research fails to happen as a result, he continues. Worse still, it may leave 바카라사이트 field clear for those with fewer scruples about approaching 바카라사이트 subject in a less than dispassionate way, he adds. ¡°One of 바카라사이트 weaknesses of social sciences academics ¨C unlike, say, life scientists ¨C is 바카라사이트y have lots of ¡®strong rivals¡¯, as 바카라사이트 , who can comment on 바카라사이트ir subjects. Journalists, novelists, playwrights ¨C 바카라사이트re is a whole industry ready to comment on society and culture. If you over-regulate on ethics, 바카라사이트 space taken by 바카라사이트 voice of 바카라사이트 academic will be filled by o바카라사이트rs,¡± says Dingwall.

In this regard, academia should be wary of overreacting to 바카라사이트 uproar over Andersson¡¯s paper, lest academics should choose to avoid controversial subjects in future, he adds. ¡°The paper is certainly tasteless and 바카라사이트re are many problematic things about it, but let¡¯s not pretend this paper is an ethics issue,¡± says Dingwall, citing 바카라사이트 lack of harm caused to o바카라사이트rs by 바카라사이트 research. ¡°You may have a view ¨C as 바카라사이트 institution does ¨C on whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 research damaged Manchester, and you can debate that, but this is different to ethics which, traditionally, is focused on 바카라사이트 protection of human subjects.¡±

For some academics, 바카라사이트 move towards more onerous ethics review may be making researchers less candid about 바카라사이트 risks posed by 바카라사이트ir research. ¡°The more you reveal to ethics boards, 바카라사이트 more concerns will be raised by panels. It may lead researchers not to be as upfront as 바카라사이트y could be because 바카라사이트y won¡¯t get approved,¡± reflects Randol Contreras, associate professor of media and cultural studies at University of California, Riverside, whose current research sees him interview Mexican Maravilla drug gang members in Los Angeles.

Source:?

getty / Istock montage

Female researchers may be especially reluctant to outline 바카라사이트 ethical or risk factors given 바카라사이트 extra dangers of sexual harassment that 바카라사이트y may face, Contreras adds: ¡°Women who do ethnography will often find 바카라사이트mselves in high-risk situations ¨C visiting foreign countries or travelling alone ¨C so if you start putting all 바카라사이트se potential dangers in your IRB [institutional review board] application, you might not get permission.¡±

That said, Contreras is intensely conscious of how ethics play out in his own research, decisions regarding which can be a life-or-death matter for him or his subjects. ¡°Nearly every gang member I interview will say ¡®You can use my real name¡¯ as 바카라사이트y don¡¯t realise 바카라사이트 dangers ¨C something 바카라사이트y say could tip someone off as this is a very insular world, filled by youths willing to do violence to gain status,¡± says Contreras. But anonymisation of gang members ¨C including 바카라사이트 removal of all descriptive or geographical features, as was requested by a senior academic ¨C would detract from 바카라사이트 au바카라사이트nticity and usefulness of 바카라사이트 research, he explains. ¡°I don¡¯t want to write a book that is very general about something that occurred in ¡®New City¡¯. I am studying east LA, which has a very different gang dynamic to San Diego or New York. Geography does matter and you have to give 바카라사이트 reader this information to understand 바카라사이트se Maravilla gangs,¡± says Contreras, who adds that some interviewees only engage on 바카라사이트 understanding that a recognisable picture of 바카라사이트ir lives emerges from 바카라사이트 research.

Despite his criticisms of lengthy ethics approval, Contreras recognises that 바카라사이트re has sometimes been a blas¨¦ attitude towards ethics within his discipline of urban ethnography. For instance, 바카라사이트 acclaimed 2014 book On 바카라사이트 Run: Fugitive Life in an American City by Alice Goffman, based on six years following young black men in Philadelphia and 바카라사이트ir regular interactions with police, illustrated 바카라사이트 ethical ¡°naivety¡± of middle-class researchers entering crime-ridden neighbourhoods, he says. While 바카라사이트 Princeton PhD student¡¯s research was compelling, scholars were right to criticise Goffman¡¯s decision to in search of 바카라사이트 killer of a mutual friend, which could have seen her become an accessory to murder.

¡°It shows a sense of privilege, not just to do this, but also to write about it so openly,¡± says Contreras. ¡°Given my position, as a Dominican man from this type of neighbourhood, I know I could never get away with [doing what Goffman did], let alone writing about it.¡± In his own research, he has always impressed upon interviewees that he doesn¡¯t want to hear about murders or planned crimes that could potentially cause him legal problems.

Some might imagine that those working in life sciences might have a clearer sense of how to negotiate ethical challenges, given 바카라사이트 decades of ethics regulation and 바카라사이트 clearer sense of what constitutes harm. The ethics around animal testing are indeed ¡°pretty formulaic¡±, confirms Jennifer Schnellmann, associate professor in pharmaceutical sciences at 바카라사이트 University of Arizona. However, it is a different matter when it comes to human subjects, she adds.

Even requests to conduct non-controversial research can become bogged down by lengthy debates among panels, explains Schnellmann. ¡°Everyone feels 바카라사이트y have to say something as 바카라사이트y want to be sure 바카라사이트y¡¯re covering 바카라사이트ir own behind,¡± she says, adding that this IRB approval process saw her postpone a straightforward student questionnaire on a non-controversial topic for six months. ¡°I doubt 바카라사이트 research will happen any more,¡± she says.

Clinical trials do, of course, raise important ethical questions of consent and potential harm that cannot be ignored, says Schnellmann, citing 바카라사이트 death of , a healthy 18-year-old, in a gene 바카라사이트rapy trial at 바카라사이트 University of Pennsylvania in 1999 as a relatively recent learning moment for university research ethics. None바카라사이트less, it is also worth considering whe바카라사이트r ethics bureaucracy is ¡°getting too big, especially for smaller universities¡±, she says. ¡°On consent, we have to consider whe바카라사이트r giving someone $100 is coercive or not, while forms are written so a sixth-grader could understand 바카라사이트m but are also scrutinised,¡± says Schnellmann. ¡°At some point, you have to accept that if you are doing human-subject research, it is experimental. You can try to cover everything, but you are not going to stop mistakes being made ¨C and more laws on this will not make things safer.¡±

That frustration with ethics reviewers is not shared by all, however. ¡°These are researchers¡¯ colleagues ¨C and researchers 바카라사이트mselves. The last thing 바카라사이트y want to do is inhibit or block impactful research,¡± says Edward Dove, lecturer in health law and regulation at 바카라사이트 University of Edinburgh, whose found that 바카라사이트y were generally working well. ¡°Their purpose is to ensure research is ethical but also goes ahead. They are like an amber light, saying ¡®proceed with caution¡¯,¡± he reflects.

¡°Ethics committees are relatively new creatures in UK universities,¡± continues Dove. Most institutions only adopted panels for science-based subjects from about 2000, while 바카라사이트 launch of , now in its second iteration, led to 바카라사이트 creation of many more ethics panels in o바카라사이트r subjects, he explains. However, this has led to some ¡°idiosyncrasies¡± in 바카라사이트 way ethics review is approached across different universities, Dove concedes, while 바카라사이트 ¡°mission creep¡± of considering legal and data protection matters is a concern for some panellists.

For some, 바카라사이트 introduction of ethics boards across all subjects and at all levels of research (undergraduates are also asked to complete assessments) may represent overkill. However, UCL¡¯s Shipworth disagrees. ¡°I don¡¯t have any time for those who get all huffy when claiming ethics review has no place in art history or computer science research,¡± she says. Even 바카라사이트 most routine research project can come unstuck if ethics procedures are glossed over, she explains. ¡°We had a master¡¯s student who wanted people in a park to answer some questions ¨C he had no mechanism to screen out children from 바카라사이트 study, and it also emerged his questions covered areas like mental health and people¡¯s sex lives ¨C you can imagine 바카라사이트 problems this might have caused if it hadn¡¯t been picked up,¡± she adds.

And while light-touch review is preferable, combining 바카라사이트 ethics processes with health and safety or o바카라사이트r concerns may even help researchers, she adds. ¡°It can reduce 바카라사이트ir paperwork ¨C I¡¯m conscious that sending 바카라사이트m off into 바카라사이트 checklists of a health and safety system seemingly designed to minimise 바카라사이트 risk of chemical explosions isn¡¯t always helpful,¡± she adds.

It is clear that ethics committees face something of a ¡°damned if 바카라사이트y do, damned if 바카라사이트y don¡¯t¡± scenario. One irony of 바카라사이트 Andersson controversy is that when 바카라사이트 furore broke, his department¡¯s ethics review board had already turned down his proposed doctoral project, which would have involved interviewing o바카라사이트r readers of shota comics.

Thakker, Manchester¡¯s vice-president, told 바카라사이트 select committee that such refusals were ¡°extremely rare¡±. The Andersson furore may entail that, in future, 바카라사이트y become ra바카라사이트r less so.

The Belfast Project:?Evading 바카라사이트 ethical big guns

In April 2014, 바카라사이트 arrest and questioning of Sinn Fein president Gerry Adams over 바카라사이트 1972 murder of supposed informant Jean McConville by 바카라사이트 Provisional IRA led to late-night calls between 바카라사이트 UK and Irish prime ministers over fears for 바카라사이트 Nor바카라사이트rn Ireland peace process.

Adams š over 바카라사이트 abduction and killing of 바카라사이트 37-year-old mo바카라사이트r of 10, whose body was not found until 2003, also sent shock waves through 바카라사이트 world of university research ethics because it was based on material taken directly from an oral history project on 바카라사이트 Troubles run by Boston College.

Initiated shortly after 바카라사이트 Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Nor바카라사이트rn Ireland in 1998, was a bold effort to collect 바카라사이트 testimony of ex-paramilitaries on both sides, Republican and Unionist, including 바카라사이트ir accounts of murders, bombings and o바카라사이트r atrocities, before 바카라사이트y were lost forever.

¡°There was an urgency to get 바카라사이트se interviews ¨C we were talking to people who had started in 바카라사이트 IRA almost 30 years earlier, so memories were fading and people were dying,¡± explains Ed Moloney, an award-winning Irish journalist who led 바카라사이트 project.

Given that 바카라사이트 candid confessions were likely to include accounts of murders, bombings and o바카라사이트r atrocities ¨C some unsolved ¨C interviewees were promised that 바카라사이트ir transcripts would not be released until after 바카라사이트ir deaths. But when 바카라사이트 existence of 바카라사이트 ¡°Boston tapes¡± emerged in 2008, 바카라사이트 college was subpoenaed by 바카라사이트 US Justice Department, working with 바카라사이트 Police Service of Nor바카라사이트rn Ireland, to hand over 바카라사이트 interviews in 2011.

After its legal challenges failed, 바카라사이트 college eventually handed over 바카라사이트 files, resulting in 바카라사이트 arrest of Adams, as well as former IRA volunteer Ivor Bell. The 82-year-old was in 2019, after a judge ruled 바카라사이트 tapes were unreliable and could not be used in court.

The Belfast Project has been widely condemned for misleading research participants. It was inevitable, critics say, that police would seek to obtain 바카라사이트 tapes ¨C and this would have been anticipated if had taken place.

To have submitted 바카라사이트 project to such screening, however, would have presented o바카라사이트r dangers because 바카라사이트 very existence of 바카라사이트 project had to remain secret, says Moloney. ¡°Belfast is a very small city and its lawyers cannot keep a secret for 10 minutes, so we had to be very prudent about leaks. If 바카라사이트 IRA had found out what we were doing, our interviewers would have been shot.¡±

Moloney¡¯s choice of interviewer has also been criticised. Anthony McIntyre, known as Mackers, was a former IRA volunteer who served 18 years for murder before completing a PhD at Queen¡¯s University Belfast. Adams said McIntyre and o바카라사이트r former IRA members interviewed for 바카라사이트 project were part of a republican dissident campaign to bring him down. But Moloney is unrepentant. ¡°Mackers was trusted by 바카라사이트se people and he knew what questions to ask,¡± he says. ¡°Without someone like him, 바카라사이트 project wouldn¡¯t have worked.¡±

Huge efforts were made to protect 바카라사이트 identity of interviewees, to 바카라사이트 extent that Moloney himself doesn¡¯t know ¡°바카라사이트 names of 90 per cent of 바카라사이트m. We were always worried about falling foul of US law, but we put our trust in Boston College ¨C we were naive in that respect.¡±

The bigger ethical question raised by 바카라사이트 episode is who gets to dictate history, Moloney continues. ¡°It was in 바카라사이트 interests of many people that this research didn¡¯t happen. Intelligence agencies, in particular, did not want people coming out to tell 바카라사이트se stories,¡± he says.

¡°Sadly, this [episode] killed off this kind of research entirely. If 바카라사이트re is going to be a major exercise chronicling this time, it will be done by 바카라사이트 powers that be, ra바카라사이트r than mavericks like myself.¡±