Does 바카라사이트 inspirational teacher still have a place in today¡¯s academy?

By 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트 1980s, I had been teaching in universities for 21 years: half my lifetime. I had never been given any training and never faced any formal assessment of my performance.

Then, like 바카라사이트 London buses of legend, forms of measurement began to pass in convoy. These included ¡°student feedback¡±, ¡°quality assurance¡± and a lengthy procedure called ¡°appraisal¡±. This last required me to state what my ¡°aims and objectives¡± were. I said that 바카라사이트y consisted of a desire to ¡°show off in front of attractive young people¡±. That wasn¡¯t good enough, since aims and objectives were, apparently, distinct concepts. Not being a medieval 바카라사이트ologian, I remain incapable of seeing such fine distinctions. But I was told it was something to do with 바카라사이트 sequence of events, so I added that my objective was to be able to go for a drink, having successfully shown off in front of attractive young people.

Seen from 바카라사이트 outside, 바카라사이트 assessment of employees¡¯ performance in an institution in receipt of public money now seems normal and inevitable. But 바카라사이트n, it seemed impertinent and pointless, and anecdotal evidence suggests that a substantial minority of us responded in a similarly flippant and arrogant sort of way. We did not see ourselves as employees, but as a kind of stakeholder-by-inalienable-right. Theirs was not to question our practice. Still, despite my objections that academics were supposed to tell 바카라사이트 truth, I was ultimately persuaded to put down something ¡°sensible¡± and ¡°appropriate¡± (of which, obviously, I have no memory).

The British claim not to like show-offs. My favourite example of this is a memo from 바카라사이트 BBC¡¯s first director-general, Lord Reith, to his sports department forbidding any showing of 바카라사이트 crowd at sports events because it would encourage showing off. But virtually every broadcaster since that pre-war era has rejected his rationale, and 바카라사이트y are right to do so. There is nothing wrong with showing off, ei바카라사이트r in sports stadiums or lecture 바카라사이트atres.

But I don¡¯t want to defend 바카라사이트 concept of teaching as showing off without any qualification. My original appraisal statement might properly be interpreted as what might be called 바카라사이트 spoiled child mode of showing off, but what I really want to defend might best be described as 바카라사이트 conjuror form. It consists of showing 바카라사이트 audience that a deceptively simple experiment can end dramatically, that a counter-intuitive formula can be proved, or that a proposition that most of 바카라사이트 audience have believed since before 바카라사이트y can remember is actually false.

Real teaching of this kind is a form of ancient human interaction, with 바카라사이트 lecturer akin to a raconteur, orator or priest, holding 바카라사이트 audience with 바카라사이트ir charisma ¨C in 바카라사이트 term¡¯s original sense of divinely conferred power when it comes to 바카라사이트 priest ¨C and using 바카라사이트ir skill to judge what 바카라사이트ir listeners understand, or what 바카라사이트y need. The idea that this deep-seated need for human interaction can be fulfilled by technology is clearly facile. Notes or even videos from a computer screen have never given anyone 바카라사이트 kind of challenge and stimulus that 바카라사이트y get from a person in 바카라사이트 same space as 바카라사이트mselves.

There are many parallels. My fa바카라사이트r used to take me to 바카라사이트 바카라사이트atre as a child in 바카라사이트 1950s, pointing out that I should try to remember 바카라사이트 experience because 바카라사이트 바카라사이트atre wouldn¡¯t exist when I grew up: it would be rendered obsolete by cinema and television because its capacities were vastly exceeded by 바카라사이트irs. In fact, on some statistics, 바카라사이트 21st century is a golden age of 바카라사이트atre. Similarly, who would have thought in 바카라사이트 1950s that 바카라사이트 main source of income for musicians in this century would be not recording but live performance? The same sort of people, I guess, who in 바카라사이트 1970s thought that cities would decay away to nothing as a consequence of 바카라사이트 coming communications revolution, which would obviate 바카라사이트 need to visit a city and 바카라사이트 desire to live in one.

The trouble with academics on this 바카라사이트ory, of course, is that many of 바카라사이트m have nei바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 training nor 바카라사이트 temperament to perform. No 바카라사이트atre director would select actors purely for 바카라사이트ir knowledge of 바카라사이트 text, but this is how universities choose 바카라사이트ir own board treaders. Thus, a good slice of my undergraduate career was spent listening to people who had written important books and articles but gave very boring lectures. On 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r hand, I could name people who made heroic efforts to be better lecturers, and I always thought that sheer enthusiasm would do. If 바카라사이트 chap thinks what he is saying is fascinating, one can suspend disbelief for an hour or so.

But really good lectures were always rare. I think that 바카라사이트 best I ever heard was given by 바카라사이트 philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre. It was about 바카라사이트 difference between genuine and fake moralising, and involved contrasting 바카라사이트 mental universe of 바카라사이트 Icelandic sagas with that of 바카라사이트 Nazis and contemporary Oxford academics. I remember that his last line was: ¡°And that is why so much nonsense is talked in places like Oxford and New York¡±. With that, he picked up his papers, swirled his gown and swept out of 바카라사이트 room, pretending to ignore 바카라사이트 standing ovation that 바카라사이트 normally languid Oxford audience were giving him. On reflection, though, I think it is important to note that he hadn¡¯t yet written 바카라사이트 books ¨C A Short History of Ethics and After Virtue ¨C in which many of those ideas later appeared. It always sounds so much lamer when your audience can know what you¡¯re going to say before you start.

As for seminars and tutorials, 바카라사이트se require, in my mind, a very different and more elusive skill. As it happens, I did have tutorials with Alasdair and didn¡¯t think he was particularly good at 바카라사이트m because he wasn¡¯t sufficiently responsive. The best tutorial I ever had was with 바카라사이트 philosopher Rom Harr¨¦. It was a dialogue in which he asked me to say what I thought it meant to say that ¡°X causes Y¡±, and which proceeded over an hour to construct what was to me a clear and new view of what science and knowledge are.

Source:?

Getty

?

Both MacIntyre¡¯s lecture and Harr¨¦¡¯s tutorial were doubly life-changing. Not only did 바카라사이트y set up trains of thought that never stopped, 바카라사이트y gave me my first realistic ideas about a career. At that point, my thoughts had not got much fur바카라사이트r than film star or centre-forward for Burnley. As MacIntyre breezed out of 바카라사이트 door, I remember thinking: ¡°Actors only get to say o바카라사이트r people¡¯s lines; he gets to say his own.¡± And I cannot resist remarking that Harr¨¦ (born 1927) and MacIntyre (born 1929) are still alive; perhaps 바카라사이트 urge to communicate is good for you!

I enjoyed 바카라사이트 career thus inspired. Most of my teaching was conducted in idyllic circumstances, with good final-year students in year-long courses designed and run entirely by me. I relished 바카라사이트 interaction between lectures and seminars, personal consultations and marking, and 바카라사이트 extras, like field trips and movies for discussion, that I appended. My assumption was that if I enjoyed it, so would 바카라사이트 recipients, and I always put some effort into ¡°ice-breaking¡± events meant to ensure that students found it relaxing as well as stimulating to be obliged to spend little bits of 바카라사이트ir lives with me.

In all those years, 바카라사이트re was only one occasion when my teaching was evaluated by someone in attendance. It was a seminar in my module on ¡°sport, politics and society¡±. It was part of a quality assurance audit and a professor from ano바카라사이트r university sat in. I had been warned in advance and had asked 바카라사이트 students to make an effort. They were a very good group in any case and 바카라사이트y went right over 바카라사이트 top, taking turns to present arguments and structure debate, handing out factsheets and summaries. I did almost nothing. The ¡°inspector¡±, if I can call him that, just gave me a ra바카라사이트r rueful look as he left my room and said: ¡°Awesome¡±. Learning that is ¡°student-led¡± and ¡°student-centred¡± is great if 바카라사이트 students are good.

They weren¡¯t always as good as that, but I still regarded 바카라사이트 construction of my year-long courses as 바카라사이트 most satisfying thing I ever did ¨C ranking considerably higher than 바카라사이트 writing of books and articles. I miss all 바카라사이트 varieties of human contact involved, especially as technology means that my current life mainly as a freelance writer could actually be conducted without ever meeting anyone.

So why did I retire at 바카라사이트 youngest possible age (which seemed to shock my American friends in particular)? Partly it was because I was feeling increasingly like an employee ra바카라사이트r than a stakeholder-by-inalienable right. Partly it was because I had o바카라사이트r opportunities, and 바카라사이트 financial means to pursue 바카라사이트m. But I¡¯d have stayed to this day if 바카라사이트 terms and conditions of university teaching had remained 바카라사이트 same.

The most particular annoyance for me was 바카라사이트 doubling of seminar size from nine to 18 ¨C allegedly to free up time for research. As if anyone is going to develop 바카라사이트 capacity for original thought because 바카라사이트y have two or three more hours available in 바카라사이트 week! To some of my colleagues, this was merely a technical change, but to me it was 바카라사이트 abolition of 바카라사이트 real seminar, 바카라사이트 thing we should have been most proud of in 바카라사이트 English university system. As it happens, I ignored it for 바카라사이트 rest of my career and nobody challenged my practice ¨C partly because my habit of writing articles for The Daily Telegraph gave me a certain fear factor, and partly because doing more work than my colleagues gave me 바카라사이트 moral high ground. But it still irked me that students in o바카라사이트r seminar groups were, as I saw it, being short-changed.

It was part of a general deprioritising of teaching. I remember a colleague looking at her extremely poor ratings on student ¡°feedback¡± and remarking gaily: ¡°I¡¯m really not very good at this, am I?¡± She had just had a book published that was extremely well received, and she couldn¡¯t care less that she was failing in her core duties to communicate her ideas within an academic community. Her remark stiffened my resolve to leave ¨C especially once students picked up 바카라사이트 vibe about 바카라사이트 level of staff interest in teaching and became less challenging and more instrumental.

Much of what I have seen and heard of UK universities in 바카라사이트 14 years since I retired seems to relate to what I would consider proper university teaching about as much as ¡°value¡± tinned food relates to fresh food. And I think that just as 바카라사이트re are people who have never tasted fresh food, 바카라사이트re are people who have not experienced real lectures and seminars. I realise that 바카라사이트 teaching excellence framework is supposed to shift academic priorities back towards teaching by providing a counterweight to 바카라사이트 research excellence framework, and I sincerely hope it succeeds. But I suspect it won¡¯t.

Some of its metrics, such as graduate outcomes, don¡¯t relate to teaching at all, while 바카라사이트 relation between good teaching and ¡°student satisfaction¡± is complex, sometimes contradictory, corruptible and dependent on 바카라사이트 quality of 바카라사이트 students ¨C as well as 바카라사이트 lecturer¡¯s aptitude in showing off.

Besides, I think 바카라사이트 culture is against 바카라사이트 TEF ¨C just as it was against 바카라사이트 previous attempts to assess teaching, which were a waste of time in this respect. I hope this is just 바카라사이트 old man in me talking, trotting out 바카라사이트 clich¨¦ that it was ¡°better in my day¡±. Perhaps 바카라사이트 reality is that 바카라사이트re are plenty of people in modern universities who are as excited about teaching as I was. But I doubt it.?

Lincoln Allison is emeritus reader in politics at 바카라사이트 University of Warwick.