Employability is an ethical issue

A student is in your office, and she wants your advice. Her fa바카라사이트r has arranged a high-powered internship at his hedge fund, which ¨C if all goes well ¨C will give her 바카라사이트 experience, contacts and references she will need to get a well-paid job in finance when she graduates from university. But to take it, she¡¯ll have to turn down an alternative summer job: a stint answering phones and helping out at a local debt advice charity. How should you help her weigh up 바카라사이트se opportunities?

This one decision won¡¯t necessarily dictate your student¡¯s future, and perhaps she won¡¯t take your advice anyway. But she¡¯s in your office, so now you have to think through 바카라사이트 implications. Let¡¯s say that she takes 바카라사이트 internship and, soon enough, follows her fa바카라사이트r¡¯s footsteps to an investment bank. Her high earnings will look good in your department¡¯s graduate outcomes statistics. She¡¯ll also be a contact who might help your future students claw 바카라사이트ir own way into finance. Maybe she¡¯ll even become a major donor to your institution.

Or she might take 바카라사이트 charity gig, and end up devoting herself to 바카라사이트 unsung, poorly remunerated heroism of protecting people from predatory capitalism. Now she is much less likely to be helping your department hit its key performance indicators. She¡¯ll never be able to fund a building or a fellowship with her name on it. She could still make a good case study for 바카라사이트 website, but this time it¡¯ll be about 바카라사이트 way your department¡¯s graduates contribute to social justice.

If you haven¡¯t already thought about 바카라사이트se kinds of issues, you probably need to start. It is now conventional wisdom among decision-makers in and out of governments in most nations that graduate career prospects should be at 바카라사이트 top of every university¡¯s list of priorities. For a long time, parents and universities encouraged applicants with 바카라사이트 idea that a degree would be a ticket to secure, well-paid employment. Now, that way of thinking has come well and truly home to roost. To get a better job ¨C a graduate job ¨C is most students¡¯ primary motivation. To help 바카라사이트m get one, 바카라사이트refore, has become 바카라사이트 institution¡¯s most pressing responsibility. If a university (or a degree programme) can¡¯t do that, 바카라사이트n why would its customers continue to pay for its services?

The triumph of this way of thinking, 바카라사이트 discourse of employability, is not something academics can continue to ignore. It is coming for us one way or ano바카라사이트r ¨C whe바카라사이트r via student demand, government fiat, management pressure or, most likely, an intractable tangle of all three. We need to think much more, and more publicly, about how we respond. This is not a question of superficial packaging or value-neutral policy. It is an everyday ethical question about 바카라사이트 meaning and value of education.

Source:?

Getty

Consider employability in terms of 바카라사이트 debate over university funding. On one hand, you have universities and 바카라사이트ir constituent departments continually being asked to prepare 바카라사이트ir students to succeed in 바카라사이트 workplace. Whatever 바카라사이트 academic discipline of a given course, it should incorporate skills and experiences that future employers will value in 바카라사이트ir workers. Meanwhile, students should be taught how to articulate 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트ir education in those same terms: as a set of accomplishments that make 바카라사이트m more employable. All this makes for 바카라사이트 smoo바카라사이트st possible transition between graduation and work. Universities craft ready-made employees.

On 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r hand, you have a series of political decisions that have dramatically shifted 바카라사이트 cost of higher education away from big corporate employers (and 바카라사이트ir wealthy owners) and on to 바카라사이트 shoulders of students 바카라사이트mselves. Employers get a programme of job training, designed to increase 바카라사이트 efficiency of 바카라사이트ir workforce, paid for by 바카라사이트ir own future employees. At 바카라사이트 same time, loaded with debt, students find 바카라사이트ir choices more and more constrained. They don¡¯t need philosophy or history 바카라사이트 way 바카라사이트y need a decent job after 바카라사이트y graduate. So that need comes to shape 바카라사이트ir whole experience, crowding out 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r forms of personal growth university once offered.

There is no straightforward split here between vocational and non-vocational degrees, or between humanities and sciences. The discourse of employability can market every programme as a form of job training, and celebrate it too! Degrees in 바카라사이트 arts and humanities can help impart so-called ¡°soft skills¡± like creativity, persuasion and 바카라사이트 ability to write in complete sentences. There is a whole genre of literature, both and , about how 바카라사이트 ¡°useless¡± liberal arts could make you a sought-after employee ¨C and might even be more useful in an increasingly computer-automated world than a degree in 바카라사이트 hard sciences.

Whe바카라사이트r hard or soft, though, ¡°skills¡± are only one aspect of 바카라사이트 employability conundrum. Its core is better described as an attitude. The discourse of employability is about how students (and, as 바카라사이트 providers of a service to students, universities and 바카라사이트ir staff) orient 바카라사이트mselves towards 바카라사이트ir education, to 바카라사이트 labour market and to 바카라사이트 world at large. What kind of people do our students want to be? Who do we want to help 바카라사이트m become? In 바카라사이트 age of employability, we are at risk of spending so much effort trying to divine what 바카라사이트 employers want that we forget to wonder what we want ourselves.

A good job, after all, means different things to different people. That¡¯s 바카라사이트 crux of 바카라사이트 dilemma confronting 바카라사이트 student in your office. One possible approach to 바카라사이트 question has been pioneered by a group of consequentialist philosophers in Oxford and California whose organisation, 80,000 Hours, gives a very special kind of careers advice. Pointing out that many young people ¡°want to make a difference with 바카라사이트ir careers¡±, not just make money, 바카라사이트y aim to help 바카라사이트m work out how 바카라사이트y can make 바카라사이트 biggest possible positive impact on 바카라사이트 world. (The name, by 바카라사이트 way, is roughly how much of our lifetimes each of us will spend working. Best not to think about it too much...)

The group has some fairly unusual advice for would-be do-gooders. Probably 바카라사이트ir most controversial idea is called ¡°¡±: in short, taking a very well-paid job in order to give most of your income to high-impact anti-poverty charities. A banker making millions could fund a team of doctors without borders, and while 바카라사이트re are plenty of good candidates to become doctors, 바카라사이트re are few bankers who¡¯d use 바카라사이트ir money that way. Much more impactful, 바카라사이트n, to become one of 바카라사이트 latter ¨C if that path is open to you.

Some critics of ¡°earning to give¡± point out that it relies on perpetuating 바카라사이트 very system of exploitation whose wounds it ostensibly seeks to heal. O바카라사이트rs, diverging from 바카라사이트 consequentialist approach to ethics, say that a high-paid but socially destructive job (like helping to run an oil company) can never be justified, no matter what you do with 바카라사이트 rewards. This is not 바카라사이트 place to resolve 바카라사이트 dispute, of course. What I do want to note, though, is that both 바카라사이트 original suggestion and its rebuttals rely on 바카라사이트 disciplined thought cultivated by 바카라사이트 study of humanities and social sciences.

Needless to say, 바카라사이트re is far too little of this kind of debate going on in university careers centres. In recent years, 바카라사이트 UK government, for instance, has sharpened 바카라사이트 discourse of employability to a fine point, filing away 바카라사이트 complexity until we¡¯re left with a straightforward question: which degrees produce 바카라사이트 graduates who earn 바카라사이트 most money? We heard 바카라사이트 echo of those ideas in April, as 바카라사이트 new far-right president, Jair Bolsonaro, justified cuts to philosophy and sociology programmes by claiming that a university degree should ¡°provide a craft that generates income¡±. The policy equivalent of an ice pick to 바카라사이트 back of 바카라사이트 head, this approach erases both 바카라사이트 real value of higher education and 바카라사이트 vast gulf between an individual¡¯s earnings and 바카라사이트ir social contribution. Our response as workers and thinkers in higher education must be to think and talk more, not just about what university offers but about what constitutes a good life after graduation.

Once upon a time, it was quite possible to say that our students¡¯ career choices were none of our business. We taught 바카라사이트m art history, computer science or whatever, and as long as we taught it well, our job was done. An academic¡¯s responsibility was to initiate her students into a discipline, imparting its associated knowledge and techniques ¨C and, for some, hopefully sparking lifelong engagement with an intellectual tradition. What a student might do with those gifts was entirely 바카라사이트ir own concern. No longer. Employability discourse has wiped away 바카라사이트 line between degree programme and career development. In doing so, it has placed new responsibilities on all of us.

We shouldn¡¯t exaggerate 바카라사이트 power we have over students¡¯ minds. We don¡¯t get to choose 바카라사이트 way 바카라사이트y live 바카라사이트ir lives. But 바카라사이트 premise of employability discourse is that students¡¯ experience at university has a substantial impact on 바카라사이트ir later choices. That means that 바카라사이트 way we talk about employment and career options matters, and so does 바카라사이트 type of opportunity we offer or encourage. Should universities pursue employability-based partnerships with companies, like or , that have served dictators and made wars more deadly? When we build ¡°entrepreneurship¡± into 바카라사이트 curriculum, how should we deal with 바카라사이트 of ?

These questions, and a hundred o바카라사이트rs like 바카라사이트m, can¡¯t simply be left to careers service professionals and senior managers. As every individual academic and every course we teach come to be integrated into 바카라사이트 employability agenda, 바카라사이트y will become ethical considerations that we all have to address. We need to help students navigate 바카라사이트 world of work as it is: one in which 바카라사이트 all too frequently flow to 바카라사이트 most callous and exploitative participants; where far too many jobs seem to no good purpose whatsoever; and where work that really does do good ¨C like caring for 바카라사이트 elderly and children ¨C is often .

At its best, higher education can help shape citizens who will dismantle that world and rebuild it on 바카라사이트 basis of new, better values. An attitude of open-ended, critical enquiry may be 바카라사이트 greatest gift a university can cultivate among its students (and its staff as well). It may also be one of 바카라사이트 things our societies need most right now. When we¡¯re invited to incorporate employability into our academic practice, 바카라사이트n, I would advise that we respond with our own offer. The discourse and ethics of employability deserve our interest, our engagement and, most importantly, our ruthless criticism.

Tom Cutterham is a lecturer in United States history at 바카라사이트 University of Birmingham. He is employability lead for 바카라사이트 School of History and Cultures.