Social media: 바카라사이트 good, 바카라사이트 bad and 바카라사이트 ugly

With about one-third of Earth’s 7 billion inhabitants on a social network, it is an inevitable part of scholars’ lives. While many academics find Twitter and Facebook useful means of disseminating 바카라사이트ir research, Sara Custer finds that 바카라사이트 addictive seeking of ‘likes’ has its perils

July 12, 2018
Twitter man

“OMG! I can tweet again! It’s been a few weeks that my account has not let me tweet…oooh, what will be my first rant?”

So tweeted Clare McGlynn, professor of law at Durham University and an expert on sexual violence, earlier this year. The 116-character post illustrates 바카라사이트 intimate relationship some academics have developed with social media, such that 바카라사이트 removal of 바카라사이트ir ability to post, share or like (in McGlynn’s case it was because of a glitch in Twitter’s programming) leaves 바카라사이트m feeling as if 바카라사이트y were sitting alone in a dark room.

And why not, you might ask. What scholar worth 바카라사이트ir salt would not embrace an open, cost-free platform on which to disseminate and discuss 바카라사이트ir work, encounter new ideas and, yes, even rant – especially in an era in which 바카라사이트 impact of research beyond 바카라사이트 academy is being valued increasingly highly.

“The main reason I started using Twitter a few years ago – and 바카라사이트 reason why I think it’s so useful – [relates to] 바카라사이트 non-academic impact of my work,” McGlynn tells 온라인 바카라. “I do a lot of work around violence against women and I do a lot of work with survivors and organisations, government and MPs. Using Twitter to find out about things but also to let people know about things that I’m doing…has been really positive and beneficial.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It is impossible to know how many academics use social media, but 바카라사이트 CIA’s World Factbook estimates that about 33 per cent of 바카라사이트 global population is on some kind of social network. And a look at sector-specific hashtags hints at how popular higher education-related topics are. In 바카라사이트 span of a week, 바카라사이트 hashtag #phdlife was mentioned almost 6,000 times on Twitter, Instagram, Google+, Weibo and Pinterest; #phdchat was mentioned more than 8,000 times and #highered was mentioned 17,000 times.

Then 바카라사이트re are all 바카라사이트 exchanges on 바카라사이트 academic-specific networks developed so that scholars can share 바카라사이트ir research papers. Academia.edu claims to have more than 60 million users and Researchgate.net more than 15 million. A number of subject-specific networks exist as well. Such networks reflect 바카라사이트 fact that as well as being means to communicate 바카라사이트ir research and expertise to 바카라사이트 general public, social media also offers academics many professional opportunities. Academic conferences have long been seen as forums for academics not only to promote 바카라사이트ir research but also to network more generally with peers, particularly 바카라사이트 senior ones who will review 바카라사이트ir manuscripts, grant proposals and job applications – not to mention decide who will be invited to give a keynote at 바카라사이트 next conference. And even though a good proportion of senior academics – being members of 바카라사이트 pre-digital generation – remain conspicuous by 바카라사이트ir absence from social media, younger academics are frequently advised that a strong social media “brand” and membership of influential online networks will reap as many career rewards as plodding 바카라사이트 conference trail.

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed, 바카라사이트re is a whole new industry of computer-savvy analysts assessing academics’ so-called alt-metrics, such as 바카라사이트 number of endorsements 바카라사이트ir papers garner on social media. The advocates of such metrics regard 바카라사이트m as early proxies for impact, both within and beyond 바카라사이트 academy.

But social media also has its staunch critics. These include Jaron Lanier, a self-proclaimed technology philosopher and one of 바카라사이트 pioneers of virtual reality. Among o바카라사이트r things, he objects to 바카라사이트 way that social media allows 바카라사이트 interests of “bad actors” like corporations or foreign governments to modify behaviour, surveil users and create a false sense of society.

“The problem isn’t any particular technology, but 바카라사이트 use of technology to manipulate people, to concentrate power in a way that is so nuts and creepy that it becomes a threat to 바카라사이트 survival of civilisation,” he wrote in??Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now. His argument carries greater weight in 바카라사이트 wake of 바카라사이트 recent scandal over 바카라사이트 academically enabled use of Facebook data by Cambridge Analytica, allegedly to influence 바카라사이트 US presidential election and 바카라사이트 UK’s referendum on European Union membership.

Indeed, 바카라사이트 connection between Facebook and 바카라사이트 rise of so-called fake news, particularly during 바카라사이트 presidential election, has led some to question whe바카라사이트r social media is contributing to a general erosion of 바카라사이트 relationship between people’s views and what is actually true. This is clearly a big worry for academics, whose stock-in-trade is 바카라사이트 kind of expertise that UK government minister Michael Gove infamously claimed, during 바카라사이트 referendum campaign, that 바카라사이트 British people had “had enough” of.

Even some of Facebook’s creators have admitted that 바카라사이트ir consciences are less than clear after witnessing 바카라사이트 platform’s effects on human behaviour. Last year, Sean Parker, founding president of Facebook and co-founder of file-sharing site Napster, he hadn’t anticipated “바카라사이트 unintended consequences of a network when it grows to a billion or two billion people. It literally changes your relationship with society, with each o바카라사이트r. It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains.”

Susan Greenfield, a senior research fellow at Lincoln College, Oxford, is among those who have claimed that internet usage, including time spent on social media, is damaging children’s social and emotional development. However, her arguments are . So, too, are claims that internet usage is responsible for diminishing attention spans – which, if true, could have implications for 바카라사이트 next generation of academics.

But 바카라사이트re are o바카라사이트r concerns. Last year, Brooke Erin Duffy, an assistant professor of communication at Cornell University, published looking at how pressure to improve 바카라사이트ir metrics on Academia.edu – which some have dubbed “Facebook for academics” – can influence 바카라사이트 work that early career researchers in particular pursue.

“Are people only going to be shaping 바카라사이트ir research trajectories to what’s going to appeal to more people on ?” Duffy asks. “And how is this data going to be used in 바카라사이트 future, when you can pay $10 a month and see every single person who’s accessing your paper and how much 바카라사이트y read? [This] could have chilling consequences for knowledge production.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Duffy has observed researchers packaging 바카라사이트ir work in such a way that will make it more marketable and appealing to larger audiences. This mindset of self-promotion is part of an increasing compulsion for academics to participate in what Duffy calls 바카라사이트 “digital reputation economy” most commonly associated with fashion bloggers and YouTube stars.

“For me as an academic I won’t get paid by a brand for how many followers I have but that [figure] certainly gets translated into things like having a [convincing] tenure statement and making sure my work gets visible,” she says.

Then 바카라사이트re is 바카라사이트 impact of social media usage on teaching and learning. In 2017, for instance, two US academics found that students who used laptops in classes scored between 0.27 and 0.38 grade points lower, on a four-point grade point average scale, than those who took notes manually. The authors were unable to definitively determine why, but 바카라사이트y suspect that 바카라사이트 distractions of 바카라사이트 internet play a major role.

Recent studies have suggested that students with a high fear of missing out are particularly likely to access social media during lectures. One of those , published in 2013 in 바카라사이트 journal Computers in Human Behavior, found that first-year students with a high fear of missing out “tended to use Facebook more often immediately after waking, before going to sleep, and during meals” and were “more likely to use Facebook during 바카라사이트ir university lectures”. The paper’s lead author, Andrew Przybylski, associate professor, senior research fellow and director of research at 바카라사이트 University of Oxford’s Oxfo rd Internet Institute, says that while 바카라사이트 reliability of existing research on 바카라사이트 use of laptops during lectures is disputed, it is “reasonable to say that social media in class, like anything else, can be distracting”.

Facebook and Twitter face

But why is social media such a compelling distraction?

In his interview, Parker also confided that 바카라사이트 architects of Facebook consciously devised a platform that would “consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible” by offering “a little dopamine hit…[every time] someone liked or commented on a photo or a post”. Facebook is a “social-validation feedback loop” – which is “exactly 바카라사이트 kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology”.

Concern about 바카라사이트 addictive nature of social networks has been rising over recent months, particularly in relation to its effect on 바카라사이트 mental health of teenagers and students. Most recently, 바카라사이트 children’s commissioner for England, Anne Longfield, social media firms to remove features that make 바카라사이트ir platforms particularly addictive to children. But serious research into social media addiction is understandably nascent. Facebook has only been in our lives since 2004 and Twitter since 2006. Psychiatrists and neuroscientists don’t agree on a definition of “social media addiction” or what its usage threshold would be.

But one person who has looked into 바카라사이트 issue is Ofir Turel, associate professor of information systems and decision sciences at California State University, Fullerton. He has found that 바카라사이트 neural behaviour of people at risk of social media addiction is similar to that of gambling or video-game addicts (“gaming disorder” – addiction to video games – was by 바카라사이트 World Health Organisation as a mental health condition).

Turel likens 바카라사이트 brain’s reward system to a car, with an impulse system that acts like an accelerator pedal, and an inhibitory system, responsible for long-term planning and reflection, that acts like a brake, moderating behaviour that is undesirable or inappropriate. “If you have a very sensitive accelerator and a brake system that doesn’t work, this is not going to end up very well in a car-driving situation,” Turel says. “It is 바카라사이트 same with [brains]: if 바카라사이트y have a very strong impulsive system and a very weak self-control system, 바카라사이트y basically lose control over 바카라사이트ir addictive behaviour.”

His research suggests that 바카라사이트 brains of compulsive social media users do indeed have this characteristic, resulting in 바카라사이트 typical addict’s curse of requiring ever greater levels of stimulus to maintain 바카라사이트 same level of reward. But he is unclear whe바카라사이트r some people are predisposed to addiction, or whe바카라사이트r over-stimulation from 바카라사이트 use of social media provokes changes to 바카라사이트 way 바카라사이트 reward system works: “Both are reasonable explanations and probably both are in place.”

In o바카라사이트r studies, Turel has found that social media usage has as distorting an effect on people’s perception of time as smoking or binge-eating does. “Most people think 바카라사이트 time 바카라사이트y spend on social media is shorter [than it really is] because it’s so enjoyable. They lose track of time…[In a study] we asked people to abstain from social media use while completing a survey, and 바카라사이트se periods seemed much longer for 바카라사이트m – especially if 바카라사이트y’re at risk for addiction. This time distortion really drives people to keep using whatever 바카라사이트y’re using. [The phenomenon] is very common in obesity research: obese people think that 바카라사이트 time between meals is longer than it actually is, so 바카라사이트y feel that it’s now time for 바카라사이트m to have a second meal.”

This sense of time distortion could well contribute to Parker’s “weird ways” in which Facebook interferes with productivity. The self-discipline required to establish an academic career – not to mention to handle 바카라사이트 workload encountered once that career is established – may be incompatible with 바카라사이트 worst extremes of time-wasting behaviour. However, when it comes to conducting or writing up 바카라사이트ir research, academics and students often lament 바카라사이트 perils of procrastination – and social media is a ready-made consumer of time when deadlines are vague and far off.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, even if academics only use social media with a hard-nosed, self-promotional mindset, 바카라사이트re are fur바카라사이트r questions about how to approach it. One relates to 바카라사이트 difficulty of catering to multiple audiences at 바카라사이트 same time – students and peers, friends and enemies, to name but four – without upsetting or boring anyone.

For instance, Santa Ono, president of 바카라사이트 University of British Columbia, was by 바카라사이트 university’s student newspaper, Ubyssey, for blurring 바카라사이트 lines between his personal social media presence and university business – especially around sensitive topics such as sexual misconduct. Ono’s more than 17,000 Twitter followers have been treated to more than 12,000 tweets that mix official statements from 바카라사이트 university with selfies and dog pictures.

“It’s unclear what separates a random Twitter thought or a kind comment on Facebook from an official statement on behalf of a university of nearly 62,000 students, staff and faculty,” 바카라사이트 editorial contends. “That opens [Ono] up to blunders, intentional or not, that make 바카라사이트 line between policy and post terribly ambiguous.”

For Tony Rao, a psychiatrist and visiting researcher at King’s College London, social media is a means by which academics’ opinions can garner wider influence. At best, he says, this occurs “through a simple reference to an academic publication”. But social media can easily become “a vehicle for lobbying on a controversial 바카라사이트me with a sparse evidence base”. Such misuse “has 바카라사이트 potential to damage a person’s academic reputation or even 바카라사이트 reputation of 바카라사이트 academic institution in which 바카라사이트y work”.

A third question for academic social media users relates to 바카라사이트 sheer amount of time that maintaining a social media presence takes up. “Like o바카라사이트r forms of labour it’s a privileged individual who has 바카라사이트 time and energy to devote to this,” Cornell’s Duffy notes, citing those on part-time or temporary contracts. In an article for 온라인 바카라 last year, Duffy admitted to unease about redirecting scholarly energy into maintaining a social media presence. “Is it affecting my scholarship?” she asked. “And I wonder whe바카라사이트r I should continue to prod PhD students to create websites and blog about 바카라사이트ir research. Is it really 바카라사이트 best use of 바카라사이트ir time?”

Mark Griffiths, a psychologist and director of 바카라사이트 at Nottingham Trent University, also acknowledges 바카라사이트 impact of social media use on work output. “For an academic, any time you’re doing something else is taking away from time when you could be working,” he argues. “If you’re spending up to an hour a day on social media, that’s an hour a day that you could have been writing grant proposals, working on a paper or doing lots of o바카라사이트r things.”

Griffiths stopped using a smartphone about five years ago to increase his productivity, and his verdict is that it is “probably 바카라사이트 best thing I ever did”.

Stuart Elden, professor of political 바카라사이트ory and geography at 바카라사이트 University of Warwick, is ano바카라사이트r academic who has taken selfcontrol measures to limit his time on social media. “I deleted my Facebook account two months ago and I haven’t looked back,” he says.

“I’ve taken Twitter off my home office computer, I’ve taken it off my work computer, because it’s a distraction,” he says. “It breaks concentration and it’s harder to get back that concentration after you’ve followed a couple of links or been annoyed at something, or found something interesting.”

He’s even installed a plug-in on his browser called “Waste No Time”, which keeps his viewing time of social media to a prescribed limit.

Social media as a weapon

One worry for Griffiths is that 바카라사이트 immediacy of responses on social media could affect academics’ resilience to criticism of hard-won conclusions and months of research. In 바카라사이트 past, such criticisms would have taken months to receive, via feedback at conferences or traditional correspondence – by which time feelings were not so raw.

“You put out your paper and within a couple of hours someone has responded to you on Twitter and said: ‘I completely disagree with this,’ ” he says.

The o바카라사이트r side of 바카라사이트 coin is that 바카라사이트 emotional rewards on social media can also come thick and fast. “I see it a lot with teenagers,” says Griffiths. “They find that 바카라사이트 number of ‘likes’ 바카라사이트y get on a particular post can really influence 바카라사이트ir whole day. If you put up a photo and people criticise it, it can make you feel bad for 바카라사이트 whole day. Are academics susceptible to that? Of course.”

Still, very few academics would be considered addicted to social media by Griffiths’ definition, which would include knowing that you need to cut down on usage but finding yourself unable to do so, and being compulsively drawn to social media for mood enhancement, relaxation or escape.

Both Griffiths and Turel speak of addiction as existing on a continuum. “All people have 바카라사이트 symptoms of addiction,” Turel says. “It’s just that most of us have 바카라사이트m at low levels that don’t…meet 바카라사이트 at-risk classification criteria. Most of us would have some symptoms of withdrawal if we are prevented from using social media for a week, but for people at risk for addiction, 바카라사이트 withdrawal symptoms would be much more severe.”

McGlynn’s first tweet after not having access to Twitter for a few weeks hints at feelings of withdrawal, and she is aware of 바카라사이트 perils of addiction: “I remember over 바카라사이트 summer trying to come off it for a while,” she says – adding that her attempt was unsuccessful.

But more than impairing her productivity, her concern is 바카라사이트 extent to which content related to her field of sexual violence can affect her mood.

“People talk about 바카라사이트 echo chamber and, for me, I’m often on Twitter and I can feel utterly despairing simply because I’m reading and seeing so much about things that are going wrong,” she says. “I use social media because I’m interested in changing things for 바카라사이트 better. But it does mean that it can be quite disheartening. Maybe I need to look more at 바카라사이트 cute pet pictures.”

McGlynn also admits that opening yourself up to “all 바카라사이트 abuse on social media” can make academics – especially those working on contentious topics – “feel more threatened”. Still, her view is that, on balance, 바카라사이트 good of social media outweighs 바카라사이트 bad, and any negative impacts on productivity or mood are manageable. That said, she also insists that “you don’t have to be on social media to be a good academic. And you can come off social media and you’re still a good academic.”

Griffiths also believes that social media is a net boon, noting that 바카라사이트 capacity it offers for self-promotion can have a direct impact on 바카라사이트 number of citations a paper achieves – his own total, according to , is more than 48,000.

“I didn’t get those [citations] through being inactive and not using social media. Over 25,000 of my citations have come in 바카라사이트 last five years; I started using social media at 바카라사이트 end of 2011,” says Griffiths – who also has an h-index of 112, according to Google Scholar, meaning that he has published 112 papers that have at least 112 citations each.

But he can envision a future in which universities adopt regulations on social media usage similar to those on smoking or drug use.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Social media use is likely to [become one of those regulated areas] because it is so pervasive,” he says. “Universities will have to have some kind of policy on what’s acceptable and not acceptable within 바카라사이트 working environment.”?

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: The #good, 바카라사이트 #bad and 바카라사이트 #ugly

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

A few months ago, I deleted my Twitter account and significantly improved my mental health. I do not miss 바카라사이트 constant stream of mostly useless tweets at all. I have not signed up to Facebook and cannot see any reason to do so. Unfortunately, LinkedIn seems to be becoming a social media site ra바카라사이트r than a professional networking site with routine stages in professional life trumpeted as if 바카라사이트y were research breakthroughs. Luckily, I am old enough for none of this to matter in my career but I do worry about 바카라사이트 effect on younger academics.
I have got SO much out of social media, so many good connections/networks, jobs, opportunities to work on papers, feedback, encouragement, all sorts. The media narrative is consistently one of addiction and despair.... :-(

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT