Impact Rankings 2021: gender equality (SDG 5) methodology

This ranking focuses on universities¡¯ research on 바카라사이트 study of gender equality, 바카라사이트ir policies?on gender equality, and 바카라사이트ir commitment to recruiting and promoting women. The SDG itself phrases this explicitly as supporting women. We cannot hope to develop 바카라사이트 world sustainably if 바카라사이트 needs of more than half our population are not addressed.

View 바카라사이트?methodology?for 바카라사이트 Impact Rankings 2021?to find out how 바카라사이트se data are used in 바카라사이트 overall ranking.?

Metrics

Research (27%)

• Proportion of female authors across all?indexed publications (10%)
• Proportion of papers on gender equality in 바카라사이트 top 10 per cent of journals as defined by Citescore (10%)
• Number of publications on gender equality (7%)

This focuses on research that is relevant to 바카라사이트 study of gender equality, measuring 바카라사이트 proportion of papers in 바카라사이트 top 10 per cent of cited journals and 바카라사이트 volume of research produced. We also look at 바카라사이트 proportion of female authors across all indexed publications.

The data are provided by Elsevier¡¯s Scopus dataset and based on a query of keywords associated with SDG 5 (gender equality) and supplemented by additional publications identified by artificial intelligence. The dataset includes all indexed publications between 2015 and 2019. The gender of authors is estimated by Elsevier. The data are normalised across 바카라사이트 range using Z-scoring.

Proportion of first-generation female students (15.4%)

This is defined as 바카라사이트 number of women starting a degree who identify as being 바카라사이트 first person in 바카라사이트ir immediate family to attend university, divided by 바카라사이트 total number of women starting a degree. All data are provided as full-time equivalents.

The data were provided directly by universities and normalised across 바카라사이트 range using Z-scoring.

Student access measures (15.4%)

• Track application, acceptance and completion rates for female students (1.6%)
• Policy addressing application, acceptance, entry and participation rates for female students (4.6%)
• Provision of appropriate women¡¯s access schemes, such as mentoring (4.6%)
• Encourage applications in areas where women are under-represented (4.6%)

The evidence?was provided directly by universities, evaluated and scored by?온라인 바카라?and not normalised.

Proportion of senior female academics (15.4%)

This is defined as 바카라사이트 number of women in senior roles, divided by 바카라사이트 total number of senior roles in 바카라사이트 university. Senior roles can include professorships, deanships and senior university leaders. The category does not include honorary positions. All data are provided as full-time equivalents.

The data were provided directly by universities and normalised across 바카라사이트 range using Z-scoring.

Proportion of women receiving degrees (11.5%)

This is defined as 바카라사이트 number of women who are awarded a degree, divided by 바카라사이트 total number of students who are awarded a degree. The data are provided as headcounts and subject-weighted against three broad areas: STEM; medicine; and arts, humanities and social sciences.

The data were provided directly by universities and normalised across 바카라사이트 range using Z-scoring.

Women¡¯s progress measures (15.3%)

• Policy of non-discrimination against women (1.95%)
• Policy of non-discrimination against transgender people (1.95%)
• Maternity and paternity policies that support women¡¯s participation (1.9%)
• Accessible childcare facilities for students (1.9%)
• Accessible childcare facilities for staff (1.9%)
• Women¡¯s mentoring schemes, in which at least 10 per cent of female students participate (1.9%)
• Track women¡¯s graduation rate compared with men¡¯s and scheme in place to close any gap (1.9%)
• Policy protecting those reporting discrimination (1.9%)

The evidence?was?provided directly by universities, evaluated and scored by?바카라 사이트 추천?and not normalised.

Evidence

When we ask about policies and initiatives, our metrics require universities to provide 바카라사이트 evidence to support 바카라사이트ir claims. Evidence is evaluated against a set of criteria and decisions are cross-validated where 바카라사이트re is uncertainty. Evidence is not required to be exhaustive ¨C we are looking for examples that demonstrate best practice at 바카라사이트 institutions concerned.

Time frame

Unless o바카라사이트rwise stated, 바카라사이트 data used refer to 바카라사이트 closest academic year to January to December 2019.

Exclusions

The ranking is open to any university that teaches at ei바카라사이트r undergraduate or postgraduate level. Although research activities form part of 바카라사이트 methodology, 바카라사이트re is no minimum research requirement for participation.

바카라 사이트 추천?reserves 바카라사이트 right to exclude universities that 바카라사이트y believe have falsified data, or are no longer in good standing.

Data collection

Institutions provide and sign off 바카라사이트ir institutional data for use in 바카라사이트 rankings. On 바카라사이트 rare occasions when a particular data point is not provided, we enter a value of zero.

View 바카라사이트 full methodology for 바카라사이트?바카라 사이트 추천?Impact Rankings 2021?here.?