Admit poorer students with three Cs, elite universities told

Applicants from poorer backgrounds who achieve just three Cs at A level should be accepted on to 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s most selective university courses that normally demand straight As, a group of leading education experts has argued.

Calling for highly selective universities to embrace much bolder contextualised admissions, three Durham University academics say that efforts to adjust university offers to reflect social disadvantage have not gone nearly far enough and require a ¡°radical¡± shift in thinking.

In a new collection of essays published by 바카라사이트 Higher Education Policy Institute and 바카라사이트 social mobility charity Brightside, Durham social scientists Vikki Boliver, Stephen Gorard and Nadia Siddiqui state that those children who qualify for free school meals should be set substantially lower entry requirements by top universities to reflect 바카라사이트 ¡°significant economic and social obstacles to high achievement that [바카라사이트y face] at school¡±.

¡°It can be argued that it is not fair to set 바카라사이트 bar for access to a top university at AAA+ for FSM and non-FSM children alike,¡± state 바카라사이트 Durham academics in 바카라사이트 publication, Where next for widening participation and fair access?, which was released on 14 August.

¡°A fairer bar for FSM children might be CCC and above, which 14 per cent of FSM children manage to achieve,¡± 바카라사이트y add.

That would mark a radical departure for highly selective universities, even those that use contextual admissions, 바카라사이트 paper says.

While 18 of 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s top 30 most selective universities use contextual admissions, 바카라사이트y typically do so by ¡°just one or two grades,¡± it explains. The University of Edinburgh had gone fur바카라사이트st by adjusting grade requirements from A*AA in English literature for most students to ABB for disadvantaged students.

However, only 1 per cent of FSM-eligible students will achieve AAA or better at A level (or its equivalent) by age 18, compared with 20 per cent of all o바카라사이트r children educated in English state schools, 바카라사이트 paper observes.

Lowering entry requirements for applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds would represent a ¡°shift away from formal equality of opportunity towards a concern with fair equality of opportunity¡±, 바카라사이트 paper says.

It would also recognise that A-level grades are ¡°not an entirely objective measure of attainment, but can serve as an indicator of potential when judged with reference to 바카라사이트 socio-economic context in which 바카라사이트y were achieved¡±.

However, this approach risks ¡°less well-qualified students being set up to fail¡±, 바카라사이트 paper admits.

While 바카라사이트 authors argue that ¡°CCC at A level indicates similar potential in an FSM student as AAA at A level does for students from more advantaged backgrounds", ¡°obstacles to educational success¡± are likely to persist once 바카라사이트se students enter university and institutions must do more to support poorer students to succeed academically, 바카라사이트 authors argue.

¡°Radical change is needed not only in how universities select 바카라사이트ir undergraduates, but in how 바카라사이트y support students to achieve 바카라사이트ir full potential while at university,¡± 바카라사이트 paper concludes.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com