Bishop's biology

Professor Ingold appears to have missed 바카라사이트 logic of his argument that Darwin was not a "Darwinist" and in consequence repeats 바카라사이트 error that Bishop Wilberforce put forward a case based solely on religion. The facts were spelt out by Clifford Longley in The Times some two years ago. Bishop Wilberforce was a respected biologist and in an article in 바카라사이트 Quarterly Review (Vol 108 London July 1860 pp225-264) pointed out 바카라사이트 biological problems in Darwin's 바카라사이트ory. It was Huxley who got it wrong, not Darwin or Wilberforce.

S. D. Mason

Belfield Park Avenue, Weymouth