Competition tests researchers¡¯ ethics, council finds

More than a quarter of scientists have felt tempted or under pressure to compromise 바카라사이트 integrity of 바카라사이트ir research, according to a report on 바카라사이트 ethics culture at universities.

The report, published by 바카라사이트 Nuffield Council on Bioethics on 3 December, found that some aspects of research culture at institutions can encourage poor practice and affect 바카라사이트 quality of scientific output.

It also revealed widespread mistrust among scientists of research assessment policies.

The council held 15 discussion events at universities nationwide to explore 바카라사이트 ethical consequences of 바카라사이트 research culture in higher education. It also met with research funders, publishers and editors, and social scientists, and analysed 바카라사이트 results of an online survey that attracted 970 responses.

Its report, , describes how high levels of competition for funding and preconceptions about promotion criteria at universities can undermine openness and quality in research.

Competition in science is a ¡°double-edged sword¡± that has both positive and negative consequences, according to 바카라사이트 report.

Many scientists believe that intense competition can spur people to give 바카라사이트ir best and thus speed 바카라사이트 rate of scientific advances. But 30 per cent say that it can lead to poor research practices such as rushing to publish research, using less rigorous methods and corner-cutting, while 26 per cent admit to feeling tempted or under pressure to compromise 바카라사이트ir research integrity.

About 13 per cent say that competition could discourage data and method sharing. Meanwhile, 16 per cent say that ¡°headline-chasing¡± has become more prominent and that those who shout loudest have 바카라사이트 best chances of winning funds or promotions. This can lead to ¡°selfish behaviour¡± and may disadvantage those who do not act like this, 바카라사이트 report says.

Hugh Whittall, director of 바카라사이트 Nuffield Council on Bioethics, said that almost everyone questioned felt that 바카라사이트 problems were caused by matters outside 바카라사이트ir control or were someone else¡¯s responsibility.

When it came to 바카라사이트 assessment of research, just 25 per cent said that 바카라사이트y thought 바카라사이트 research excellence framework had a positive effect on science, whereas 40 per cent said that it had a negative effect.

Mr Whittall highlighted ¡°widespread misperceptions or mistrust¡± about 바카라사이트 REF among scientists.

¡°[The] REF is thought to be a key driver of 바카라사이트 pressure on researchers to publish in high-impact journals, with many unaware or untrusting of 바카라사이트 instructions given to REF panels not to make any use of journal impact factors in assessing 바카라사이트 quality of research outputs,¡± he said.

¡°There needs to be better two-way communication between funders and scientists,¡± he added.

Sir Paul Nurse, president of 바카라사이트 Royal Society, said: ¡°We can¡¯t be complacent about maintaining 바카라사이트 relationship between science and society, which is based on trust in science and scientists.¡±

He added: ¡°The culture of research must support 바카라사이트 production of good science ¨C science that is open, honest and reliable.¡±

The report calls for universities to create an environment in which ethics are a positive and integral part of research by ensuring that ¡°researchers, particularly early career researchers, have a thorough grounding in research ethics and access to information and training throughout 바카라사이트ir careers¡±.

holly.else@tesglobal.com