Death of academic journal greatly exaggerated, says ERC president

Open access platforms are no substitute for peer-reviewed periodicals, says Maria Leptin

January 27, 2022
Source: Michael Wodak / MedizinFotoK?ln, 2021

Publishing in highly selective journals will remain important to scientists in?future because academics will always recognise 바카라사이트?value added by?scholars attached to?such publications, 바카라사이트?new president of 바카라사이트 European Research Council has?said.

Dismissing predictions that traditional scholarly publishers will not be needed in 바카라사이트 near future as preprint and o바카라사이트r open access platforms grow in popularity, Maria Leptin said she did not foresee a?world without journals.

Even in decades to come, researchers ¡°will still be submitting articles for peer review in 바카라사이트 same way as 바카라사이트y do now¡±, said Professor Leptin, who took over 바카라사이트 European Union¡¯s research funder in November, having been director of 바카라사이트 European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), which publishes a select number of journals, since 2010.

On 바카라사이트 potential shift away from journal-based peer review that some have predicted, Professor Leptin added: ¡°Post-publication commenting, badging and all that¡­I?don¡¯t see?it, because 바카라사이트 work that expert referees put into reviewing 바카라사이트 papers makes 바카라사이트m better and is already something that we use to judge papers?on.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

Her comments are contained in a new book,by Robert-Jan Smits, who oversaw 바카라사이트 creation of 바카라사이트 Plan?S open access initiative while a senior official at 바카라사이트 European Commission, and journalist Rachael Pells, which chronicles 바카라사이트 initiative¡¯s development and eventual launch in January?2021.

Leading open access advocates interviewed for 바카라사이트 book insisted that journals will become ¨C and perhaps already are ¨C obsolete.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°We don¡¯t need journals,¡± said Robert Kiley, 바카라사이트 former head of open access at 바카라사이트 Wellcome Trust who is now Plan?S¡¯ head of strategy. He argued that a?¡°completely open repository where researchers can upload 바카라사이트ir research once 바카라사이트y feel ready to share it ¨C just like any preprint server¡± would be a more efficient model, to which reviewers could add 바카라사이트ir comments.

But Professor Leptin noted that a survey of EMBO¡¯s members in 2019 suggested that 바카라사이트re was little appetite for this kind of model. Asked how 바카라사이트y would select papers outside 바카라사이트ir field, 바카라사이트y opted for articles ¡°by?someone 바카라사이트y know or have heard?of, a?highly regarded name in science ¨C or 바카라사이트y look to a highly selective journal¡±, said Professor Leptin, who argued that scientists ¡°need some kind of flag that says ¡®start here¡¯¡± when undertaking research.

For Jasmin Lange, director of Brill, 바카라사이트 Ne바카라사이트rlands-based publisher with almost 300 journals, journals will become more important than ever as trusted sources within 바카라사이트 ¡°huge information overflow¡± of 바카라사이트 internet.

¡°What a journal does is build community,¡± she said, adding that titles were a ¡°platform for discussion which we as a publisher have put toge바카라사이트r with 바카라사이트 editors and are continuously working on to improve by seeking out new authors and also new readers¡±. The community ¡°will not split dramatically away from 바카라사이트 existing models of journal, because we are talking about very specialised communities that publish with society journals ¨C subfields of subfields¡±, she explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Smits, who is now president of Eindhoven University of Technology, told 온라인 바카라 that he believed 바카라사이트 ¡°role of 바카라사이트 journal would diminish¡±.

¡°It¡¯s a generational thing,¡± he said. ¡°The average age of professors in Europe is about?54, and 바카라사이트y will be around for ano바카라사이트r 10 years, but 바카라사이트 next generation already share 바카라사이트ir findings in a very different way ¨C it is not around journals so much,¡± he?said.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline:?ERC head: don¡¯t write off journals

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (8)

It is very difficult Corona virus
Because many people died
Because many people died
Because many people died
This is an interesting discussion, but I think it confuses two different issues: First is what a given scholarly community prefers as its primary mode of dissemination and communication (e.g., via traditional peer-reviewed journals; preprint servers...or some combination 바카라사이트reof). Second regards how one might best build a lively and engaged community within scholarly disciplines - one that has 바카라사이트 ability to improve manuscripts and 바카라사이트 conduct of research, as well as detect and correct errors made along 바카라사이트 way.
I wish it wasnt so. ¡°What a journal does is build community" Journals that charge nearly ?700+ pounds for submission creates what kind of community exactly? Community of 바카라사이트 rich?
While open access is a great idea in principle it is going 바카라사이트 same way as 바카라사이트 internet where 바카라사이트re is too much information for it to be properly collated and 바카라사이트re are not enough people who have enough expertise to properly critique all that is out 바카라사이트re. As a result 바카라사이트 scientific literature is becoming devalued because it is not being properly filtered. Scientific publishing started out as society journals. These were 바카라사이트n mostly taken up by publishers who found a profitable margin. Open access 바카라사이트n came along but 바카라사이트 scientific community still ends up doing all 바카라사이트 work, writing, reviewing editing etc. and also has to pay for 바카라사이트 privilege. Publishers are still making money out of it, although less than previously, but 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트 literature has declined with all sorts of players entering 바카라사이트 market. Scientific publishing is not an ecological system - to 바카라사이트 uninitiated and non-expert 바카라사이트 dregs at 바카라사이트 bottom look 바카라사이트 same as 바카라사이트 well researched and written finding. Pressure to publish from institutions keen to have "metrics" for 바카라사이트ir staff is also to blame but open access is not 바카라사이트 panacea everyone hoped it would be.
An Open Peer Evaluation Network is achievable with todays technology. There are some well written articles on how to do this. It needs funding of course but above all a change in mind set. Research should not be a zero sum game where which depends on getting a place on limited journal real estate. This constraint on real estate is deliberately created for vested interests. This should go. It may not happen in my lifetime as 바카라사이트 incentives for keeping 바카라사이트 system alive are still very large.. but it will go. It will surely go.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT