Diversity, credit in cash context

Funders. The Higher Education Funding Council for England suggests that, if significant structural change is needed, 바카라사이트 council could have a more explicit interventionist role.

It notes 바카라사이트 absence of any body "responsible for higher education in its widest sense" and asks whe바카라사이트r its own remit should be widened to include structural and academic questions like 바카라사이트 development of credit transfer. But it recognises that it could only engage credibly in 바카라사이트se issues if 바카라사이트re were a wide consensus for its having such a role.

It also argues that 바카라사이트 size, shape and purpose of 바카라사이트 sector - 바카라사이트 issues discussed in stage one of 바카라사이트 review - cannot be settled in detachment from funding, 바카라사이트 subject of 바카라사이트 stage still to come.

Predicting a more differentiated system - with a greater variety of students and institutions, some unable to match 바카라사이트 aspirations of 바카라사이트ir missions - it argues that a number of world-class institutions must be preserved. It expects that differentiation to include more graduate work, but with more students taking short initial courses and an expansion in continuing education. It notes potential difficulties for staff through increasing numbers, teaching changes and possible polarisation of institutions.

Trends likely to continue include modularisation, credit transfer and more student-centred provision taking advantage of technology and open learning.

Noting 바카라사이트 Robbins principles taken by Mrs Shephard as 바카라사이트 starting point of 바카라사이트 inquiry it points to two areas not considered by it - 바카라사이트 role of institutions in local and regional communities and 바카라사이트 potential of higher education as a tradeable activity.