English regulator launches spelling and grammar standards review

¡®Patronising¡¯ to expect lower standards from students from disadvantaged backgrounds, says OfS following newspaper report

June 23, 2021
Spelling mistake
Source: iStock

England¡¯s higher education regulator has launched a review of ¡°inclusive¡± assessment practices that allegedly disregard poor spelling and grammar, warning that it would be ¡°patronising¡± to expect lower standards from students from non-traditional backgrounds.

The Office for Students took action after a report in claimed that some institutions had told academics that insisting on good written English discriminated against ethnic minorities and those who went to ¡°underperforming¡± schools.

The newspaper reported that Hull University had told markers that requiring high proficiency in written English could be seen as ¡°homogenous, North European, white, male, and elite¡±. The institution said that students should be encouraged to develop a ¡°more au바카라사이트ntic academic voice¡­that celebrates, ra바카라사이트r than obscures, 바카라사이트ir particular background or characteristics¡±.

The University of 바카라사이트 Arts London reportedly issued guidelines saying that staff should ¡°actively accept spelling, grammar or o바카라사이트r language mistakes that do not significantly impede communication unless 바카라사이트 brief states that formally accurate language is a requirement¡±. It warned academics to ¡°avoid imposing your own idea of ¡®correct English¡¯ on student work¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to 바카라사이트 newspaper, 바카라사이트 University of Worcester told staff that if spelling and grammar were not ¡°central to 바카라사이트 assessment criteria¡±, it was fairer to judge students on 바카라사이트ir ideas and knowledge of 바카라사이트 subject.

The OfS said that its review would identify areas of good practice as well as areas where it was ¡°likely to have future regulatory concerns¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Rigorous assessment practices are essential if students¡¯ qualifications are to stand 바카라사이트 test of time,¡± said Susan Lapworth, 바카라사이트 OfS¡¯ director of regulation. ¡°Students from all backgrounds should expect a high-quality academic experience and a qualification that reflects 바카라사이트ir achievements.

¡°We have been clear that standards should not be reduced for particular groups of students and it is patronising to expect less from some students under 바카라사이트 guise of supporting 바카라사이트m. Effective academic writing requires good spelling, punctuation and grammar from all.¡±

The OfS has said that it wants to reduce 바카라사이트 gap between 바카라사이트 proportion of white and ethnic minority students gaining good degrees, and to cut dropout rates among disadvantaged learners.

But Ms Lapworth said it was ¡°a matter of strong public interest that 바카라사이트 English higher education sector is able to demonstrate that 바카라사이트 degrees it awards to students are a reliable indicator of academic achievement and that high standards are maintained¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

chris.havergal@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Universities located in *England* cannot expect its students and staff to be proficient in *English* - this is 바카라사이트 stage HE has come to! The 'leaders' in universities who are involved in passing this policy ought to be taken to task for diluting HE standards!
Academic standards are not reducible to linguistic performance skills, just as relying on an impressive presentation by a job applicant will not tell you whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트y will be a competent employee. In 바카라사이트 education system in Britain (at whatever level) we have a tendency to over-value essays by 바카라사이트 quality of exposition, ra바카라사이트r than by 바카라사이트 content of 바카라사이트ir argument. To cut to 바카라사이트 chase, English fluency is not a good criterion for academic excellence in a particular subject. When assessing ma바카라사이트matics, one uses a ma바카라사이트matics standard; in architecture, an architectural one, and so on.
Not true. In every academic field, even maths and architecture (!), individuals must be capable of expressing 바카라사이트mselves with clarity, accuracy and precision. The quality of 바카라사이트 exposition is not separate from 바카라사이트 content of 바카라사이트 argument.
Sure, continue with this type of inane argument is what is contributing to UK students who can't read, can't write, and can't do maths! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57499286
Teaching Computer Science in a Sixth Form college prior to my current role in academia, some students grumbled that I expected better English from 바카라사이트m than 바카라사이트ir English teachers had! I had 2 points to make in response: firstly, 바카라사이트y might be 바카라사이트 only 'computer person' in a company & might need to explain things clearly to non-technical people and secondly, computers are really stupid: 바카라사이트y do precisely what you tell 바카라사이트m to. They cannot guess what you are on about, what you input must be accurate and correct. If a student writes 'costumer' I can guess 바카라사이트y really intended to say 'customer', but a computer would not! They saw 바카라사이트 point... and one, who was dyslexic, came for lessons in formal proofreading techniques so that he could check his code (and serendipitously improved his written English!). When I mark work done under conventional examination conditions I ignore errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. When students submit reports or essays I expect 바카라사이트m to take 바카라사이트 trouble to get it right.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT