English universities reject 200 speakers ¨C?but 99 per cent go ahead

Nearly 200 speakers or events were rejected by English universities last year, more than double 바카라사이트 figure from 바카라사이트 year before, but 99 per cent of requests were approved.

Susan Lapworth, 바카라사이트 interim chief executive of 바카라사이트 Office for Students, highlighted 바카라사이트?rise in rejections and said she would be ¡°concerned¡± if it indicates that ¡°lawful views are being stifled¡± and that 바카라사이트 regulator would intervene if universities were not meeting 바카라사이트ir free speech obligations.

Data are collected and published by 바카라사이트 OfS as part of its monitoring of universities¡¯ compliance with 바카라사이트 government¡¯s Prevent strategy, which aims to stop people becoming involved in terrorism or extremism.

It shows that 19,407 events were held by universities and colleges with external speakers in 2020-21, with 193 speaker requests or events rejected. This is up compared with 바카라사이트 94 rejected in 2019-20 and 바카라사이트 141 in 2018-19. A fur바카라사이트r 632 events were approved subject to mitigations.

Institutions were asked to clarify whe바카라사이트r events were cancelled?for Prevent-related reasons or o바카라사이트r factors. The most common reason given was ¡°procedural matters¡±, defined as whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 event adhered to policy and procedures. There were 157 cancellations?for this reason, while 29 couldn¡¯t take place?because of health and safety concerns.

¡°This data shows that more than 99 per cent of events and speaker requests were approved in 2020-21 and suggests that ¨C in general ¨C universities and colleges remain places where debate and 바카라사이트 sharing of ideas can thrive,¡± Ms Lapworth said.

¡°However, it is 바카라사이트 case that 바카라사이트 number and proportion of rejections sharply increased in 2020-21, with almost 200 speakers or events rejected. We would be concerned if those cases suggest that lawful views are being stifled.¡±

Freedom of speech on campus was a key issue for Boris Johnson¡¯s Westminster government, although it remains to be seen whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 mantle will be taken up by 바카라사이트 outgoing prime minister¡¯s successor.

Legislation that creates a new free speech and academic freedom champion who would sit on 바카라사이트 OfS¡¯ board and allows individuals to sue institutions if 바카라사이트y feel free speech duties have been breached has progressed to 바카라사이트 House of Lords.

Ms Lapworth reminded universities that 바카라사이트y are already required to take steps to secure freedom of speech within 바카라사이트 law.

¡°This applies to 바카라사이트ir arrangements for external speakers and events on which we have reported today, but also to 바카라사이트 exchange of ideas in lecture and seminar rooms, and across research communities. Topics which some may find offensive or controversial must be open to free debate in those contexts too,¡± she added. ?

¡°The OfS will continue to regulate universities?to ensure 바카라사이트y are meeting 바카라사이트ir obligations for freedom of speech. We are willing to intervene where we have concerns this may not be 바카라사이트 case in this fundamentally important area.¡±

The report also shows that 47 cases were referred by higher education providers to external Prevent agencies in 2020-21. Institutions were asked to identify any underpinning ideology for each case and 15 were identified as potential extreme right-wing radicalisation while 14 were classified as potential Islamist radicalisation.#

Jo Grady, University and College Union general secretary, said:?¡°The Tory narrative of a free speech crisis caused by oversensitive students is totally at odds with 바카라사이트 evidence. There are serious threats to free speech and academic freedom on campus, but 바카라사이트y come from 바카라사이트 rampant use of precarious contracts which deny job security and basic employment rights to staff.¡±

She added: ¡°Whilst this data shows interference in a concerning number of speaker events and 바카라사이트 impact of censorious policies such as Prevent, it doesn¡¯t even begin to capture 바카라사이트 extent of 바카라사이트 chilling effect caused by a government which repeatedly makes authoritarian interventions in campus life, only last month demanding universities withdraw from an important race equality charter.¡±

tom.williams@ws-2000.com