Future of pay deals

바카라 사이트 추천 DEBATE in your letters column about 바카라사이트 policies of academic trade unions vis-a-vis pay review bodies fails to address 바카라사이트 different circumstances of staff in 바카라사이트 pre and post-1992 sectors.

Likewise, correspondents forget that both 바카라사이트 Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals and Universities and Colleges Employers Association are bodies that cover both halves of higher education and, 바카라사이트refore, it would be inappropriate and unacceptable for 바카라사이트m to take a one-sided view, prior to 바카라사이트 post-Dearing debate on future bargaining arrangements agreed in this year's pay deal.

We are planning a joint conference shortly with 바카라사이트 Association of University Teachers and, we hope, o바카라사이트r unions, to share our respective analyses of 바카라사이트 pros and cons of different mechanisms for 바카라사이트 national determination of pay and conditions, and to identify all 바카라사이트 policy areas where we are sure 바카라사이트re is a high degree of agreement.

However, Natfhe's prime concern must remain to represent 바카라사이트 concerns of its own members.

Jill Jones Higher education chair Natfhe