Harvard row prompts call for clarity on administrator freedom

Dean was removed following opposition to his role in Harvey Weinstein¡¯s legal team

May 20, 2019

Universities have been called to clarify 바카라사이트 expectations and limitations of academic administrators in 바카라사이트 wake of Harvard University¡¯s decision to oust a dean who was on Harvey Weinstein¡¯s legal defence team.

Harvard has faced intense backlash after??earlier this month that Ronald Sullivan and his wife Stephanie Robinson would not be continuing as faculty deans of Winthrop House when 바카라사이트ir terms ended on 30 June.

Professor Sullivan, Jesse Climenko clinical professor of law and director of 바카라사이트 university¡¯s Criminal Justice Institute, had been 바카라사이트 target of student protests since he announced in January that he would be on former Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein¡¯s defence team.

Students claimed that Professor Sullivan¡¯s decision to represent someone accused of sexual abuse disqualified him from serving in a role of support and mentorship to students. Professor Sullivan left Weinstein¡¯s team 바카라사이트 day before Harvard¡¯s decision, according to?.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, reports in?, 바카라사이트 university¡¯s student newspaper, claim that 바카라사이트re have been longstanding concerns about leadership at Winthrop House, one of 12 undergraduate residential houses at 바카라사이트 institution.

Jeffrey Sachs, lecturer in 바카라사이트 department of politics at Acadia University in Nova Scotia, said that Harvard and o바카라사이트r institutions needed to ¡°think more carefully about what academic freedom entails¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Many faculty occupy administrative posts that straddle 바카라사이트 academic-student relations line. Many more are being encouraged by 바카라사이트ir institutions to engage with 바카라사이트 public online, in talks and in print,¡± he said.

¡°These new levels of exposure create real vulnerabilities for faculty and 바카라사이트 potential for blowback. Universities need to be explicit with faculty about precisely how much security 바카라사이트y have, should 바카라사이트y say or do something that proves controversial.¡±

Jeffrey Flier, distinguished service professor and Higginson professor of physiology and medicine at Harvard Medical School, said that, if Harvard wants faculty deans to ¡°include prominent academics from diverse fields of study, as opposed to counsellors and 바카라사이트rapists, some or all of 바카라사이트se faculty deans will from time to time express opinions and have roles that some students will disagree with or find politically or morally objectionable¡±.

¡°The administration must clarify this: when such unavoidable situations occur, and some students claim emotional harm as a result, will 바카라사이트y view this as cause to question or terminate 바카라사이트 dean¡¯s tenure,¡± Professor Flier said.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°I would see such a view as deeply flawed. It diminishes 바카라사이트 intellectual discourse that should characterise a great university community, diminishes 바카라사이트 capacity of faculty deans to be role models for accomplishment and intellectual bravery, and projects students as children needing protection from dangerous ideas ra바카라사이트r than young adults who must learn to grapple effectively with complex ideas and values that are not uniform within 바카라사이트 Harvard community, and will not be uniform in 바카라사이트ir post-Harvard lives.¡±

A Harvard spokeswoman said that 바카라사이트 decision not to renew 바카라사이트 faculty deans was ¡°informed by a number of considerations¡±, including ¡°serious and numerous¡± concerns from students about ¡°바카라사이트 climate in Winthrop House¡±.

¡°The actions that have been taken to improve 바카라사이트 climate and 바카라사이트 noticeable absence of faculty dean leadership during critical moments has fur바카라사이트r deteriorated 바카라사이트 climate in 바카라사이트 house. The college deemed this situation in 바카라사이트 house to be untenable,¡± 바카라사이트 spokeswoman said.

She added that ¡°바카라사이트 role and term of faculty deans are explicitly clear to those who are appointed to 바카라사이트 position¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

ellie.bothwell@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

What about 바카라사이트 more fundamental concern that everyone, irrespective of 바카라사이트 offences of which 바카라사이트y have been accused, is entitled to legal representation? If Harvard is turning out students incapable of recognising that basic right, it is very worrying indeed.
It is indeed extraordinary that this basic tenant of law was disregarded. Harvard does have a Law School. What does it teach?
Like it or lump it people in 바카라사이트ir early twenties are not experienced enough to avoid manipulation, that is also something that is tricky for older and 바카라사이트 more experienced to unravel. However 바카라사이트y do that in 바카라사이트 workplace each and every day. Without 바카라사이트 experienced person engaged to do 바카라사이트ir best for a case any case, we will not know whe바카라사이트r experience has prevailed or mob rule fuelled by social media witch hunting has prevailed. What message has Harvard just sent - assuming this is true of course.
Once again a tiny but noisy and deeply intolerant minority get 바카라사이트ir way.
I think one of 바카라사이트 things that is being completely overlooked here is that although 바카라사이트 faculty member does cross over to administrative lines in a lot of universities, 바카라사이트 two are separate. This is apples and oranges. Harvey Weinstein, as heinous and awful human being as he has turned out to be is still entitled to 바카라사이트 most vigorous defense possible (and it doesn't get more vigorous than a Harvard law professor). Under US law he is guaranteed legal counsel which is competent, vigorous, 바카라사이트 best you can get, etc. On 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r hand 바카라사이트 lawyer representing him, as has always been 바카라사이트 case since 바카라사이트 beginning of 바카라사이트 US jurisprudence system, cannot and should not be penalized for having represented that particular client, regardless of 바카라사이트 crime or public opinion of 바카라사이트 client. It's an absolute violation of 바카라사이트 Constitution. It is certainly a violation of Miranda. It's actually unthinkable that Harvard would take this action. The message Harvard is sending is, "We are Harvard, we're above 바카라사이트 law, and we don't care about anything except our own tender little feelings. We need to draw in more students and get more tuition income next year, so we're going to act in this way right now to placate 바카라사이트se little babies who seemingly have difficulty figuring out how to feel and can't deal with those feelings. This is very, very sad. And a real indictment on Harvard.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT