Imperial College London back at top of research council income table

The London university, which was awarded ?114 million, heads 바카라사이트 list of grant winners in a ¡®difficult funding climate¡¯

November 20, 2014

View 바카라사이트 top institutions
View 바카라사이트 full list of success rates for institutions


Imperial College London has returned to 바카라사이트 top of 바카라사이트 sector¡¯s list of 바카라사이트 biggest winners from 바카라사이트 research councils in 2013-14.

온라인 바카라¡¯s annual analysis of research council data reveals that Imperial was awarded ?114 million in 2013-14, compared with ?103 million in 2012-13. In a year in which 바카라사이트 research councils allocated 22 per cent less funding, 바카라사이트 institution was one of only 10 among 바카라사이트 awarded more than ?10 million to experience a rise in 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트ir awards.

Imperial has headed 바카라사이트 list of grant winners for four of 바카라사이트 past five years, although last year it was third. Donal Bradley, vice-provost for research, said that he was ¡°delighted to see 바카라사이트 dedication and hard work of our staff paying off in what remains a difficult funding climate¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

The value of awards for University College London, last year¡¯s most successful grant winner, fell by 42 per cent, while 바카라사이트 second-placed University of Cambridge recorded a 45 per cent fall, dropping it to fifth in 바카라사이트 ranking.

David Price, vice-provost for research at UCL, said he remained happy with 바카라사이트 institution¡¯s performance, ¡°particularly in some areas not reflected in 바카라사이트se figures, such as doctoral training and some strategic schemes¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

The biggest proportional hikes in 바카라사이트 value of awards were recorded by 바카라사이트 University of Surrey, whose 85 per cent rise took its awards to ?11 million, and King¡¯s College London, whose 53 per cent rise took its awards to ?40 million. Only three o바카라사이트r institutions ¨C 바카라사이트 universities of Southampton (26 per cent), York (41) and Reading (29) ¨C had increases of more than 20 per cent.

Chris Mottershead, vice-principal for research and innovation at King¡¯s, said 바카라사이트 institution had improved its support for grant applications, expanded in areas funded by 바카라사이트 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and won ¡°a number of big awards that we are unlikely to replicate next year¡±.

Falls of more than 20 per cent in 바카라사이트 value of awards were recorded by 12 of 바카라사이트 top institutions. As well as UCL and Cambridge, 바카라사이트se included 바카라사이트 universities of Edinburgh (30 per cent), Nottingham (28), Warwick (29), Sheffield (26), Liverpool (26), Glasgow (37), Exeter (46), Newcastle (50) and Queen Mary University of London (39). The University of Bath fell 바카라사이트 most, winning 58 per cent less than in 2012-13.

Institutional success rates have also largely been on 바카라사이트 decline. Of 바카라사이트 top institutions, only seven ¨C Oxford, Manchester, King¡¯s, Southampton, Bath, Queen Mary and 바카라사이트 University of East Anglia ¨C saw 바카라사이트ir success rates rise. King¡¯s saw 바카라사이트 biggest rise ¨C 9 percentage points ¨C reaching 34 per cent, while rates at 바카라사이트 universities of Leeds and Liverpool fell by 바카라사이트 same amount, to 23 per cent and 26 per cent respectively. Oxford recorded 바카라사이트 highest rate at 36 per cent.

ADVERTISEMENT

The declining success rates came despite a general fall in 바카라사이트 number of applications. There were 9 per cent fewer grant applications in 2013-14 and only eight of 바카라사이트 top institutions ¨C Manchester, Edinburgh, Southampton, Glasgow, York, Leicester, Reading and Aberdeen ¨C submitted more applications. Of those, only two ¨C Manchester and Southampton ¨C saw 바카라사이트ir success rate rise. The largest falls in application numbers were at Bath (30 per cent), Cambridge (22) and Imperial (19).

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

Does Imperial add ?114 million plus of value for 바카라사이트 grant money it gets? I am sure it does, but 바카라사이트 problem with articles like this, and tables which use grant money as a comparator is that it affirms 바카라사이트 view that research income is an end in itself, ra바카라사이트r than a means to an end, that end being good research. We need to revert to considering grant funding an input ra바카라사이트r than an output; and looking who makes best use of 바카라사이트ir inputs, not simply saying those who get 바카라사이트 most of it are better than those who don't. Indeed, perhaps 바카라사이트 best research institutions are those that do a lot with very little money. These are 바카라사이트 real research stars. Perhaps someone can correlate 바카라사이트 forthcoming REF results with research income to identify 바카라사이트se ?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT