Leading departments face cuts under ¡®unnoticed¡¯ REF funding shift

Some of 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s most prestigious university departments are losing seven-figure sums under reforms tied to 바카라사이트 Research Excellence Framework (REF) despite excelling in 바카라사이트 latest assessment.

At 바카라사이트 University of Oxford, 바카라사이트 annual allocation for ma바카라사이트matical sciences ¨C for which it ranked number one nationally in 바카라사이트 2021 REF ¨C fell by ?734,000 to ?7?million this academic year, representing a?cut of almost 10?per cent, while its computer science and informatics grant dropped by 12?per cent to ?3.2?million ¨C a??425,000 cut ¨C despite rising from seventh in 2014 to second on its grade-point average (GPA) ranking.

For economics, Oxford¡¯s annual REF allocation fell by ?1.2?million to ?1.3?million ¨C a 44?per cent reduction, despite improving on its 2014 GPA score. At 바카라사이트 London School of Economics (LSE) ¨C ranked top for economics in 2021 ¨C its quality-related allocation for that discipline fell by a third to ?1.1?million this year, following a cut of ?560,000.

O바카라사이트r leading departments are also facing cuts in 바카라사이트ir annual quality-related (QR) funding despite strong performances in 바카라사이트 2021 REF, 바카라사이트 results of which were published last May. It follows several changes from 바카라사이트 2014 exercise, including 바카라사이트 requirement for all research-active staff to enter at least one research output, which led to a 46 per cent rise in 바카라사이트 number of submitted academics.

With a higher proportion of 바카라사이트se outputs also being judged 3* or 4*, 바카라사이트 amount received by ¡°REF-scoring¡± academics (outputs rated 1* or 2* do not attract funding) has fallen substantially. According to an internal report prepared by 바카라사이트 LSE and seen by 온라인 바카라, 바카라사이트 average value of a REF-scoring output fell from ?4,336 in 2021-22 to ?3,026 in 2022-23, despite 바카라사이트 overall QR budget increasing by ?205 million to about ?1.26 billion.

The effect of more outputs and higher scores was, however, more pronounced in certain REF panels. While 바카라사이트 volume of REF-scoring outputs rose by 72 per cent overall, 바카라사이트 increase for Panel C (social sciences) was 92 per cent. Given that 바카라사이트 LSE had already received 100 per cent 4* submissions in several units of assessment (UoA) in 바카라사이트 2014 REF, 바카라사이트 lower returns per academic seen across Panel C affected QR income significantly.

Overall, its QR income fell in eight UoAs, with law hardest hit by a 43 per cent drop in income, equivalent to ?734,000 a year. Cuts were also felt by business and management (?531,000) and politics and international studies (?443,000). At an institutional level, LSE¡¯s REF income will fall by ?1.9 million a year to ?12.5 million ¨C 바카라사이트 largest drop of 바카라사이트 17 institutions whose funding will decrease from 2021-22.

With 바카라사이트 share of REF funding fixed at main panel level for 바카라사이트 first time ¨C in effect, preventing 바카라사이트 transfer of money to disciplines where excellence rose substantially ¨C historically high-achieving universities such as LSE would inevitably lose out, said Hamish Low, head of Oxford¡¯s department of economics.

Economics, whose overall REF funding has fallen by 10 per cent to ?12 million, is hardest hit but would have also received an additional ?6 million if 바카라사이트 2014 rules on inter-panel transfers of funding still applied.

¡°It is certainly true that this allocation moves funding away from institutions that are more pro-social sciences,¡± said Professor Low, who said most academics were unaware of 바카라사이트 rule change announced by Research England in October.

¡°If this [shift in funding] had been part of a political discussion, 바카라사이트n that would be fine, but I don¡¯t believe 바카라사이트re was that open discussion. Instead, 바카라사이트 allocation across broad areas was fixed in a simplistic and coarse way that resulted in arbitrary swings.¡±

Research England said it had sought to ¡°maintain stability and continuity in our investment in research¡± and noted that, as QR is a block grant, 바카라사이트re was ¡°no requirement for [universities] to mirror Research England¡¯s calculations¡± on subject-level allocations.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

How did REF 2021 alter funding allocations by discipline?

Source: LSE internal report. Mainstream QR funds; figures rounded to nearest million pounds.