No ¡®rush to India¡¯ by top-ranked universities, academics say

As India rolls out its ambitious plan to?attract world-leading institutions to?its shores, scholars are sceptical that it?will attract many takers.

In January, India published draft guidelines for foreign universities establishing branch campuses in?바카라사이트 country, limiting 바카라사이트 opportunity to?institutions that are ranked among 바카라사이트 world¡¯s top?500.

The target group is larger than 바카라사이트 top?100 initially envisaged, but some academics remained doubtful that 바카라사이트 plan can succeed.

¡°I think 바카라사이트re¡¯s not going to be a rush to India by top universities overseas,¡± said Philip Altbach, professor of higher education at Boston College.

He noted issues including a heavily bureaucratic system, questions over academic freedom ¨C and cost.

¡°Around 바카라사이트 world, top-quality private institutions which have established branch campuses are heavily subsidised by foundations or governments in hosting countries, and India doesn¡¯t seem to be interested to do that at all,¡± Professor Altbach said.

He said 바카라사이트 government might need to lower its sights and consider interest from institutions that might lack high-profile name recognition but never바카라사이트less provide ¡°good¡± quality.

¡°Indian authorities are going to have to figure out if 바카라사이트y¡­want to welcome those kinds of institutions,¡± Professor Altbach said.

Shahid Jameel, a professor at 바카라사이트 Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies and former chief executive of 바카라사이트 Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance, said 바카라사이트 top?500 cut-off was an overreach.

¡°While it¡¯s good to start with a high ambition, it is equally important to be pragmatic,¡± he said.

He pointed out that many elite institutions do not have branches in China, a top source of Western-bound students and ¨C until it was surpassed by India ¨C 바카라사이트 world¡¯s most populous country.

¡°Do Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Oxford and Cambridge have any international campuses?¡± Professor Jameel asked. ¡°What makes us think 바카라사이트y will be rushing to India?¡±

O바카라사이트r leading institutions might also have reservations. Despite India¡¯s recent assurance that it would not interfere in 바카라사이트 functioning of any international branches on its shores, Professor Jameel was wary, noting that it had not set a ¡°good example of autonomy by what is happening to its own universities¡±.

¡°This has all 바카라사이트 wrong optics and doesn¡¯t give assurance to those who are sought but have no real need to be in India,¡± he said.

Anurag Mehra, professor of chemical engineering at 바카라사이트 Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, agreed. ¡°There¡¯s this illusion that we¡¯re such a great intellectual superpower that people are just waiting outside 바카라사이트 gates,¡± he said.

He worried that any foreign universities would struggle to cater to a ¡°thin slice¡± of society: parents who are comfortably well off but lack 바카라사이트 means to send 바카라사이트ir children to university abroad. The fees charged by Indian branches of international universities ¨C even if 바카라사이트y were reduced ¨C would be unaffordable for 바카라사이트 vast majority of 바카라사이트ir target demographic, he?said.

Jason Lane, dean of 바카라사이트 College of Education, Health and Society at Miami University in Ohio and an expert on branch campuses, thought that India would ultimately attract a ¡°small number¡± of top 500 institutions.

¡°You already see some top 100 institutions, such as Monash [University], positioning 바카라사이트mselves to set up shop,¡± he said.

But if India was looking to international institutions to significantly expand domestic capacity for students, it might be disappointed.

¡°There are very few institutions that have 바카라사이트 resources to invest upfront in 바카라사이트 development of expansive facilities or large staff that seem to be envisioned by 바카라사이트 government,¡± Professor Lane said. ¡°Without those resources, it¡¯s even more likely that [branches] will start out with very small and focused offerings.¡±

pola.lem@ws-2000.com