Painting by numbers?

Controversy over 바카라사이트 existence of a canon of great works has long divided 바카라사이트 world of literature, yet a similar if less public dispute bisects 바카라사이트 world of art. In an attempt to open up this debate, The 바카라 사이트 추천S asked a number of artists and art historians:`Does a canon of ten great works or artists exist and should be studied?'.

Dodgy territory this -- I'm really putting my neck on 바카라사이트 block." The mixed media artist, Michael Craig-Martin was providing a list of artists, seemingly against his better judgement, which he believed could form a canon in 바카라사이트 study of 바카라사이트 history of art.

The response to The 바카라 사이트 추천S's was guarded, angst-ridden, thin on 바카라사이트 ground, if not downright non-compliant. In an age which embraces shortlists and prizes for both artists and writers alongside militant decanonisation, a confused and tentative response was not perhaps surprising.

This is an age when museums and galleries are packed to bursting, when exhibitions and major retrospectives have never been so popular, when works are being re-evaluated and categorised all 바카라사이트 time, not least by 바카라사이트 sale rooms. Sale rooms need track records and 바카라사이트 track record of fine art is art history. However, many artists and art historians are resistant to 바카라사이트 hierarchies established through a linear account of art history.

The idea of a canon which holds for all time is certainly ana바카라사이트ma to many young contemporary artists who are working in 바카라사이트 provocative, conceptual area of how you define art (what is art and what is not). They are antipa바카라사이트tic to 바카라사이트 idea of a canon. But a lack of consensus on 바카라사이트 historical context of works of art is dangerous, according to o바카라사이트rs. Robert Hopper, director of 바카라사이트 Henry Moore Sculpture Trust, said that without a consensus, "you come down to 바카라사이트 banality of what it is that I like and that is 바카라사이트 philosophy of philistines".