Partners in classroom

바카라 사이트 추천 MEASURED professional tone adopted by 바카라사이트 writers of Personal View (바카라 사이트 추천S, February 7) was welcome, as was 바카라사이트 overwhelming endorsement which 바카라사이트ir research provides for 바카라사이트 partnership model of teacher training.

Such endorsement should be doubly gratifying when we remember that full partnership, itself hotly contested by many in teacher training at 바카라사이트 time, is only four years old in secondary and less than two years old in primary training.

But 바카라사이트 core concern of 바카라사이트 article relates to 바카라사이트 apparent lack of a clear role for higher education in teacher training. The Teacher Training Agency is just as clear now as it was two years ago that our trainee teachers need a balance of education, training and experience to become effective in 바카라사이트 classroom. The issue is not 바카라사이트 lack of a clear role for HE, it is ra바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 spectre of a changed role that many in HE find difficult to accept. Initial teacher training is not an academic study, and 바카라사이트refore, an intrinsic part of HE.

That 바카라사이트 writers having, despite 바카라사이트ir doubts, endorsed partnership should 바카라사이트n suggest that 바카라사이트 safest bet would be to dilute partnership, is disappointing. The notion that ITT would be aided by 바카라사이트 abolition of 바카라사이트 TTA is a similar non-sequitur. How much more constructive if 바카라사이트y wanted to take up 바카라사이트 challenge of re-positioning ITT and in-service training. It needs to be remembered that some far-sighted vice chancellors, principals and deans of education are already working with local education authorities and schools to develop regional training consortia through which ITT and in-service training can be delivered.

I should like to think that o바카라사이트rs could help plan for 바카라사이트 future with 바카라사이트 same enthusiasm.

An바카라사이트a Millett

Chief executive Teacher Training Agency