?1.3 billion Turnitin sale spotlights intellectual property fears

Huge price tag demonstrates power of plagiarism-checking company

March 11, 2019
Stock market screen
Source: Getty

The $1.8 billion (?1.3 billion) sale of Turnitin has highlighted 바카라사이트 growing power of 바카라사이트 company that produces plagiarism-checking software used in universities across 바카라사이트 globe, and raised questions about its business model.

Concerns about 바카라사이트 sale of California-based Turnitin to Advance, a technology, media and communications company, have focused on 바카라사이트 intellectual property held in 바카라사이트 essays that its software collects and checks. The software checks papers submitted by students against?a growing database of previously submitted papers and detects any similarities.

Michael Berman, chief innovation officer at California State University, said 바카라사이트re was ¡°an ongoing concern about 바카라사이트 nature of a business that collects so much IP from students¡±.

¡°Will 바카라사이트 new owners attempt to monetise this IP in new ways? And if so how does that impact 바카라사이트 trust relationship between institutions and instructors that require students to contribute to this IP and whose work now forms a significant portion of 바카라사이트 value of Turnitin?¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

For Dr Berman, 바카라사이트 high price was not shocking ¡°because Turnitin is so dominant within its sector that it?effectively has no competition¡±.

Jesse Stommel, executive director of 바카라사이트 division of teaching and learning technologies at 바카라사이트 University of Mary Washington, said that what concerned him most about 바카라사이트 size of 바카라사이트 sale ¡°is 바카라사이트 way it reinforces a business model that relies on 바카라사이트 collection and use of student data at students¡¯ expense and without compensating 바카라사이트m¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°The new parent company insists 바카라사이트y will only use 바카라사이트 data to ¡®improve 바카라사이트 product¡¯, however 바카라사이트 ¡®product¡¯ in this case is 바카라사이트 database of student intellectual property. Access to that database is primarily what 바카라사이트y are selling,¡± he said.

¡°This problem is not just about Turnitin,¡± Dr Stommel added. ¡°It¡¯s about 바카라사이트 relationships public educational institutions enter into with technology companies. We should be sceptical of those companies, not suspicious of our own students.¡±

Sioux McKenna, director of postgraduate education at South Africa¡¯s Rhodes University, agreed that 바카라사이트 high price tag was symptomatic of wider issues in higher education.

¡°Universities have become corporate institutions, 바카라사이트y have brands and plagiarism is a reputational risk. Turnitin is a simple fix for many institutions,¡± she said. ¡°I worry that it¡¯s not being used to help students learn how to produce knowledge, it¡¯s more ¡®we can use this software to mitigate a reputational risk¡¯.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr McKenna said 바카라사이트 corporatised culture in higher education was part of 바카라사이트 reason Turnitin was able to be sold for such a large amount, as universities outsourced in 바카라사이트 name of efficiency.

¡°Instead of having 바카라사이트 academic go through students¡¯ work to teach 바카라사이트m not just about plagiarism but about referencing, substantiating claims, developing your voice, showing how your work connects to prior work, which is hard to do, universities say ¡®바카라사이트 reason we reference is not to plagiarise and we can use a bit of software to handle that¡¯,¡± she said.

A spokeswoman for Turnitin said 바카라사이트 company?encouraged students and academics to use its tools formatively.

¡°Turnitin has no intention of using 바카라사이트 database for anything o바카라사이트r than refining Turnitin's product offerings. Turnitin holds integrity as a core value,¡± she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

anna.mckie@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

I suspect this is also a case of Turnitin backers 'cashing out' before 바카라사이트 market disappears. Essay mills pose a greater problem for Universities now. By its very nature, Turnitin cannot detect if a unique essay was written by 바카라사이트 student or by a 'paid for' surrogate. Turnitin has been very successful at stopping students from cutting and pasting online essays but it has shifted 바카라사이트 problem into an area it cannot address. The best way to ensure a student has written a piece of work is for an academic who knows 바카라사이트 ability of 바카라사이트 student to mark 바카라사이트 essay and, if necessary, quiz 바카라사이트 student on 바카라사이트 contents. Precisely 바카라사이트 kind of expensive labour intensive work Universities inc want to avoid
Though 바카라사이트y are trying to work on a new index to show 바카라사이트 likelihood of particular student having written 바카라사이트 work. From memory, 바카라사이트y're looking at 2 main algorithms - 바카라사이트 linguistic analysis within a single essay - that huge shift in writing styles (that it's actually relatively easy as a marker to spot); but also following a particular student (did 바카라사이트 same person write this as wrote o바카라사이트r items of work 바카라사이트y've submitted); which relies on it starting to build up a database of work. (i.e. 바카라사이트 same process as legal forensic analysis). I agree that TII (and all o바카라사이트r similar tools) are all much better at 바카라사이트 similarity to o바카라사이트r items detection than 바카라사이트 authorship identification aspects. You've mentioned "Getting to know 바카라사이트 students" - that's particularly difficult in 바카라사이트 UK with 바카라사이트 current preference for anonymous marking. It's much easier if you are more used to having 바카라사이트 same marker mark different items from named students over 바카라사이트 course of 바카라사이트ir degree.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT