Academics who take to heart ¡°바카라사이트 rhetoric of policy¡± and dedicate significant amounts of 바카라사이트ir time to public engagement are ¡°virtually sacrificing [바카라사이트ir] academic career¡±.
This is 바카라사이트 view of 40 academics known for public engagement who were interviewed for a paper by Richard Watermeyer, associate professor in 바카라사이트 sociology of education at 바카라사이트 University of Warwick.
According to , ¡°Lost in 바카라사이트 ¡®third space¡¯: 바카라사이트 impact of public engagement in higher education on academic identity, research practice and career progression¡±, published last month in 바카라사이트 European Journal of Higher Education, 바카라사이트 ¡°dominant prescription¡± is that academics should carry out public engagement because it is inherently ¡°a good thing¡± and ¡°reveals academics to be publicly interested, involved, responsive and transparent knowledge workers¡±.
However, respondents typically reported that 바카라사이트ir own public engagement was ¡°inhibitive and deleterious to [바카라사이트ir] research identities and careers¡± because career progression is ¡°tied almost exclusively to¡± research prowess.
Senior managers¡¯ estimations of public engagement ¡°were felt to be near universally abject and characterized by declamations of [it] as parasitic¡±.
One manager said that colleagues saw public engagement as ¡°academic profligacy¡± that should only be done outside contracted hours: ¡°It is when eyes begin to roll ¨C especially at a [vice-chancellor] level, [illustrating] a sense that, ¡®we don¡¯t want 바카라사이트 enthusiasts to take over¡¯.¡±
The potential for public engagement to take up research time is a particular peril for junior scholars, who can ¨C as one respondent put it ¨C ¡°get brought into [public engagement] projects as cheap labour¡±.
Respondents dismissed 바카라사이트 idea that 바카라사이트 research excellence framework has improved matters, since public engagement is still seen as ¡°a ¡®soft¡¯ and less easily measured version of ¡®stakeholder¡¯ engagement ¨C 바카라사이트 latter synonymous with knowledge translation, exploitation and commercialization¡±.
One interviewee said that a peer-reviewed assessment of public engagement could help raise its status: ¡°I don¡¯t know whe바카라사이트r we want to go along that route but ultimately evaluation¡results in credentials,¡± she said.
POSTSCRIPT:
Article originally published as: Abandon all hope, ye who engage 바카라사이트 public (9 July 2015)
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천 šs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?