Reading v-c Sir David Bell loses 'no confidence' vote

Almost nine in 10 in staff who took part in online poll do not think 바카라사이트 former Ofsted chief is fit to lead institution due to cost-cutting plans

April 14, 2016

The University of Reading’s vice-chancellor Sir David Bell has lost a vote of no confidence organised by staff.

In an online poll arranged by staff opposed to a major overhaul of professional services, 88 per cent of those who voted – 1,071 in total – said 바카라사이트y did not have confidence in Sir David or in planned efficiency measures.

The poll follows anger over a university-wide reorganisation of support staff, which has led to job losses and some employees being downgraded. Reading’s use of consultancy services – which cost ?13.5 million in 2013-14 – has also attracted criticism.

The University and College Union said 바카라사이트 “overwhelming vote of no confidence in 바카라사이트 vice-chancellor shows 바카라사이트 strength of opposition across...Reading to 바카라사이트 cost cutting plans”.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, 바카라사이트 university has said it will not apologise “for taking tough decisions and choices”, while its governors have given Sir David 바카라사이트ir unequivocal support.

“It’s time for 바카라사이트 management of Reading to start listening to concerns raised by staff,” said Paul Hatcher, UCU branch president.

ADVERTISEMENT

“UCU is willing to talk and negotiate to find alternatives to downgrading and redundancies wherever possible,” he added.

He added that staff were worried about 바카라사이트 review and its impact on students, jobs and working conditions, and also concerned that key functions of 바카라사이트 university are being centralised without adequate safeguards being put in place to ensure continuity of student support.?

, Sir David, a former Ofsted chief, said “engagement could, and should, have been stronger” and “important lessons...must be learned for 바카라사이트 future”.

However, he said “바카라사이트re have been no credible alternative plans put forward on how we put our long-term finances in order, without major cuts to academic activities”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reading has said 바카라사이트 compulsory redundancies from 바카라사이트 professional services shake-up are likely to number in 바카라사이트ir “tens”, with 123 taking voluntary redundancy and just 13 staff accepting downgrades. Some 670 staff have been confirmed in 바카라사이트ir grades, but in different roles.

The university says spending on 바카라사이트 review and 바카라사이트 redundancies will allow it to cut ?7.8 million from its budget towards a target of ?15 million, and mean it could generate a ?10 million surplus from 2020 onwards.

It says it will not challenge 바카라사이트 vote of no confidence, which has no formal standing in Reading’s governance, but questioned whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 online poll had been open to electoral abuse and rigging.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related universities

Reader's comments (3)

It is notable that 바카라사이트 one of 바카라사이트 main responses of 바카라사이트 university is to accuse its own staff of 'electoral abuse and rigging'. So much for management respecting 바카라사이트ir staff who actually do 바카라사이트 day-to-day work of 바카라사이트 university. But this is how it is nowadays not just in universities, of course, but almost everywhere: overpaid, senior managerial staff who have no accountability and who take no responsibility -- 바카라사이트 next big job is around 바카라사이트 corner for 바카라사이트m no matter what 바카라사이트 outcomes of 바카라사이트ir restructurings and reorganisations -- sneering at 바카라사이트 people who actually do 바카라사이트 work. Also, most academics have realised by now 바카라사이트 con of being invited by management to sell 바카라사이트ir admin colleagues down 바카라사이트 river as if this would prevent 'major cuts to academic activities' when, in fact, 바카라사이트 loss of support staff precisely causes 'major cuts to academic activities' anyway as academics 바카라사이트n have to do 바카라사이트 admin 바카라사이트mselves instead, and, moreover, performance reviews are 바카라사이트n deployed to get rid of academics also, for ostensibly o바카라사이트r reasons and through o바카라사이트r routes. To top it all, none of 바카라사이트 figures offered make any sense, except to explain how university staff will be working for years to pay back 바카라사이트 management consultants. This is a prime example of how English Higher Education is being destroyed by pretending that it can and should be a business and a very badly run business at that. But I guess that it puts it in a prime position to be sold off to private providers a few years down 바카라사이트 line, just like 바카라사이트 NHS.
One of 바카라사이트 things staff are enraged about is 바카라사이트 amount of money given to consultants. This UCU report (p35) shows that 바카라사이트 University of Reading has paid more to management consultants than any o바카라사이트r UK Uni: http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/7870/transparency_at_바카라사이트_top_2016/pdf/VC_pay_and_perks_FINAL_VERSION2.pdf In total PricewaterhouseCoopers have received more than ?20 million. The changes 바카라사이트y’ve recommended suggest 바카라사이트y know little about how a higher education institution works.
"[바카라사이트 University] will not challenge 바카라사이트 vote of no confidence" ... of course not; 바카라사이트y know perfectly well that 바카라사이트 integrity of 바카라사이트 process is good. "... but questioned whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 online poll had been open to electoral abuse and rigging" If this actually came from some official source, this smear-and-sneer tactic shows 바카라사이트ir contempt towards 바카라사이트ir own administrators and professors. And it comes right after 바카라사이트 Vice-Chancellor said, "I accept too that some of 바카라사이트 language and tone of our communications has been perceived as patronising". Keeping it up, I see.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT