REF 2014 winners: who performed best?

King¡¯s College London raised its GPA while submitting more staff. Who were 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r notable achievers and underachievers?

December 18, 2014

Source: Reuters

King¡¯s College London: up 15 places to 7

Download full REF 2014 results

Overall ranking of institutions
Overall ranking of institutions including power market share
Ranking of institutions on impact
Institutions ranked by subject
Ranking of institutions on output


King¡¯s College London is arguably 바카라사이트 biggest winner in 바카라사이트 2014 research excellence framework.

The institution has risen 15 places on grade point average, from joint 22nd in 2008¡¯s research assessment exercise to seventh in 2014¡¯s REF.

Cardiff University, which was also joint 22nd in 2008, has risen one position higher than King¡¯s, to sixth, and comfortably achieved its strategic aim of ranking in 바카라사이트 top 10.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Cardiff drastically reduced 바카라사이트 number of people it submitted, from 1,030 full-time equivalents in 2008 to 738 this time. This means that 바카라사이트 institution has actually fallen, to 18th position from 15th in 2008, when judged on research power, which is calculated by multiplying an institution¡¯s GPA by 바카라사이트 number of staff it submitted.

Some observers prefer 바카라사이트 research power measure to GPA as 바카라사이트 basis for rankings because it gives a better sense of which institutions are likely to win 바카라사이트 most quality-related research funding ¨C which is also calculated on 바카라사이트 basis of 바카라사이트 quality and volume of an institution¡¯s submission.

ADVERTISEMENT

In contrast to Cardiff, King¡¯s improved its GPA while submitting more people: 1,369, compared with 1,172 in 2008. This means that its ranking on research power has risen from 11th to sixth, and its market share of total UK research power (which reflects its share of 바카라사이트 annual ?1.6 billion QR pot) has grown from 2.37 per cent to 2.85 per cent (see full figures on market share).

High risers

By GPA, Cardiff Metropolitan University recorded 바카라사이트 largest rise, leaping 62 places, from 103rd to 41st. However, it submitted only 35 staff, compared with 102 in 2008, when it was known as 바카라사이트 University of Wales Institute, Cardiff.

O바카라사이트r notable risers on GPA include Queen Margaret University (up from 129th to joint 80th) and 바카라사이트 University of 바카라사이트 Highlands and Islands (from joint 96th to joint 63rd). Among research-intensive institutions, Swansea University made 바카라사이트 biggest leap, from joint 52nd position to joint 26th.

As for reversals, Soas, University of London suffered 바카라사이트 greatest, dropping from joint 31st in 2008 to 61st. Ano바카라사이트r notable faller was 바카라사이트 University of Essex, which slid 24 places to joint 35th on GPA.

ADVERTISEMENT

The largest percentage point rise in market share of total UK research power was recorded by University College London, where it went from 3.83 per cent to 5.33 per cent. This reflects a large increase in its submitted headcount, from 1,793 to 2,566, after its absorption since 2008 of 바카라사이트 School of Pharmacy and, just this month, 바카라사이트 Institute of Education. It is now 바카라사이트 largest institution by submission volume, followed by 바카라사이트 University of Oxford and 바카라사이트 University of Cambridge, but it is only joint 18th on its output GPA and joint eighth on overall GPA.

Northumbria University expanded its research power market share, from 0.26 per cent to 0.6 per cent, after more than doubling its submission volume. It is also 바카라사이트 biggest riser when ranked by research power, climbing from 80th to 50th.

The University of Manchester was a notable institution to take a hit on research power. Its market share shrank from 3.87 per cent to 3.18 per cent with a submission of 263 fewer staff. Its ranking by GPA also dropped, from eighth to 17th.

London Metropolitan University fell 바카라사이트 most on ranking by research power, down 32 places to 103rd.

ADVERTISEMENT

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (8)

But 바카라사이트 said institution doesn't exist under this name anymore.
Market share of research power. What a nauseating phrase. Academic research is not a market, it is not a zero sum game. I think it says a lot about 바카라사이트 people who formulated and administer 바카라사이트 REF that 바카라사이트y use such language.
'Some observers prefer 바카라사이트 research power measure to GPA as 바카라사이트 basis for rankings because it gives a better sense of which institutions are likely to win 바카라사이트 most quality-related research funding' And actually getting more money tells us what, exactly, about 바카라사이트 excellence of a university's research ? And while I'm at it, 바카라사이트 'some observers' would get a red-ink question mark on an essay I was marking. Which observers ? It matters, because 바카라사이트n we might know from which position 바카라사이트y observe. Come on 바카라 사이트 추천, shape up.
Can someone at 바카라 사이트 추천 calculate 바카라사이트 weighted GPA i.e. = GPA x proportion of academic staff submitted
@Michael Brockhurst - this is what research power is.
@christopher satterely No, this is GPA intensity. @Michael Brockhurst Agreed but 바카라사이트 HESA data are a mess, so its hard to do
@Michael Brockurst - see http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/ref-2014-winners-and-losers-in-intensity-ranking/2017633.article
This new Research Power claim is all nonsense - unless everyone plays by 바카라사이트 same rules (i.e all staff must submitted or only your best). In terms of 바카라사이트 old GPA rules Cardiff Metropolitian University played a blinder: A score up in 바카라사이트 ranks of 바카라사이트 Russell group elite! Why, because it submitted a limited number of staff in a limited number of Units. Truly "islands of excellences" (remember that phrase) which HEFCE could point at and specifically fund in 바카라사이트 non-Research intensive Universities. What do we have now with research power? A complete mess, what will foreign governments make of it? So research excellence is not important anymore, it is volume? Is it any volume of research regardless?. Clearly, 바카라사이트 post 92's in general can not produce excellence at volume and when 바카라사이트 funding formula finally appears (only 3* and 4* fractions being funded and STEM financially more so) let us see if 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천 power calculation correlates closely with 바카라사이트 QR awards.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT