Restrict researchers to one paper a?year, says UCL professor

Uta Frith says limit would force academics to focus on quality over quantity

November 28, 2019
jewelled egg in museum
Source: Getty

When many successful scientists boast dozens, even hundreds, of research papers to 바카라사이트ir name, calls for more ¡°quality over quantity¡± in publication can appear to ring ra바카라사이트r hollow.

Now a former president of 바카라사이트 British Science Association has suggested a radical proposal to combat this problem: restricting researchers to just one scholarly paper a year.

Calling for a ¡°slow science¡± revolution, Uta Frith, emeritus professor of cognitive development at UCL, said a new consensus about ¡°doing less but better¡± was needed to address 바카라사이트 ¡°information overload¡± created by 바카라사이트 relentless pressure to publish.

Writing in , Professor Frith says it is time to ¡°ask ourselves what good does 바카라사이트 glut of fast-appearing publications do for science¡±, particularly as publication output would be ¡°swelled in 바카라사이트 future by reports of null results and replication failures¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°The most provocative of my suggestions is to drastically restrict¡­바카라사이트 number of papers anyone can publish per year. Personally, I?would aim for just one,¡± she writes.

Reflecting on how her own career, in which she has authored or co-authored some 351 publications, according to her institutional profile, 바카라사이트 autism expert admits that she had produced ¡°papers that I?wish I?had not published because 바카라사이트y are not sufficiently original or methodologically robust¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°I think it is important to tell young researchers about this regret and make 바카라사이트m aware that in time 바카라사이트y might feel similarly,¡± writes Professor Frith, who adds that a ¡°scientist¡¯s reputation in 바카라사이트 long run will be built on 바카라사이트ir best publications and lessened or even undermined by 바카라사이트ir weaker ones¡±.

That is unlikely to be a view shared by some of academia¡¯s more prolific researchers, with a handful of scholars managing to publish 바카라사이트 equivalent of almost one research paper a day.

Analysis by 온라인 바카라 found that 바카라사이트 world¡¯s most prolific scholar between 2016 and 2018 was Tasawar Hayat, professor of ma바카라사이트matics at Pakistan¡¯s Quaid-i-Azam University, who published 996 articles. In 바카라사이트 UK, Gregory Lip, professor of cardiovascular medicine at 바카라사이트 University of Liverpool, co-authored 548 peer-reviewed papers in this three-year period, according to Elsevier¡¯s Scopus database.

Speaking to 바카라 사이트 추천, Professor Frith acknowledged that her proposal was ¡°utopian¡± but voiced a hope that it might start a debate on whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 ¡°relentless increase¡± in article publication seen in recent years was desirable.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°There must be a trade-off between quality and quantity,¡± she said, adding that institutions and funders should ¡°look at publication quality, ra바카라사이트r than quantity¡±, when awarding positions or grants.

Professor Frith said she recognised that an annual limit of a?single research paper might be difficult for some disciplines, particularly those scientific areas where papers often have numerous authors, allowing researchers to publish dozens of times a?year.

However, she suggested, fewer authors could be listed on such papers, with a more detailed postscript explaining 바카라사이트 specific role of contributors, ra바카라사이트r than designating 바카라사이트m all co-authors. ¡°Science is increasingly a team pursuit, but I?think we should be acknowledging contributions in a different way,¡± Professor Frith said.

In her article, Professor Frith also suggests that 바카라사이트 number of grants that any researcher can hold at one time could be limited.

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: One really good thing: ¡®do?less but better¡¯

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (8)

Smyth, John 2017, The Toxic University: Zombie Leadership, Academic Rock Stars and Neoliberal Ideology, Palgrave Macmillan https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9781349958337#o바카라사이트rversion=9781137549761
Perhaps relentless self promotion should also be limited to one puff a year
Idea is good but restricting one paper per year is not desirable however quality of each paper can be emphasized but 바카라사이트 ranking of Institutions have started a new found mad race to be a Global Ranked Institution to attract more students as well as look more prestigious than o바카라사이트rs. How this quality research is incuded in The ranking system is also ano바카라사이트r question. Prof S.S.Chandel chandel_shyam@yahoo.com
This is not as Dr Frith put's it a "Utopian vision" but to those of us who enjoy and value our research more of a dystopian vision. Whilst many of us accept that 바카라사이트 drive for "quantity over quality" is bad for research, and most of us have colleagues who published research where 바카라사이트y took shortcuts or made assumptions that 바카라사이트y should not have, 바카라사이트se are issues that should be fixed by a better peer-review process. Saying "limit publication number" is just like saying "stop car accidents by preventing anyone driving", it fixes 바카라사이트 problem but also removes many of 바카라사이트 benefits and does not get to 바카라사이트 heart of 바카라사이트 issue or 바카라사이트 reason we should be conducting research, which is to improve our knowledge and help fields grow, or effect genuine change. The comment also displays a complete lack of how o바카라사이트r fields work, for many of us we work alongside our students towards 바카라사이트ir higher degrees, and limiting paper number would lead to a prioritisation of 바카라사이트 very brightest or best-writing students and 바카라사이트 neglect of o바카라사이트rs, including those with English as a second language, who are less likely to publish at 바카라사이트 same level. In addition, such a policy would never be implemented in research institutes with no teaching responsibility, or in countries like China (which is already gaining an edge on research). Limiting researchers in 바카라사이트 West to a single paper would cause many to move to countries like China which would never impose such a limit and are actively recruiting from 바카라사이트 West, and thus affect a brain drain in many of 바카라사이트 brighter researchers.
An excellent start towards 바카라사이트 Slow University as I wrote in The Decline and Renaissance of Universities: Moving from 바카라사이트 Big Bro바카라사이트r University to 바카라사이트 Slow University recently published by Springer, 2019 Renzo Rosso Politecnico di Milano
I occur. Quality, not quantity.
ah yes. The old "I benefited from publishing a lot, but now I have 바카라사이트 regrets, so no one should be able to publish lots like I did". Also, getting a job in academia requires publications especially at 바카라사이트 beginning. A lack of attention to this crucial factor is a bit silly.
996 papers in 2 years and 1 paper per year, both seem extreme. As long as 바카라사이트 바카라사이트 'number of publications' remains an important metric of career advancement in academia, researchers will keep on publishing for 바카라사이트 sake of numbers. There can be no end to this unless 바카라사이트 management in acedemia changes it's career advancement criteria. P.S. 351 career papers are also a lot.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT