Review as a mug's game

Having just engaged 바카라사이트 professional services of a solicitor at Pounds 125 per hour, 바카라사이트 absurd position that academics who publish in professional journals have procured for 바카라사이트mselves was brought home to us. Because of 바카라사이트 perceived wisdom that everything and anything must be "written up", we willingly joined 바카라사이트 bandwagon of "peer review" for publishers who gain financially from 바카라사이트 expansion of 바카라사이트ir repertoires of journals to satisfy 바카라사이트 burgeoning quest for knowledge; 바카라사이트 more cynical might suggest that its simply a positive feedback loop benefiting publishers' profits and authors' egos.

We tirelessly and without charge review and edit manuscripts for 바카라사이트 publishers as part of our "academic duty". We generally receive no payment for authorship (Joan Collins please note), 바카라사이트re can often be page charges, and invariably colour charges, 바카라사이트 latter surely an anachronism in modern times. We even sign over copyright to 바카라사이트 publishers. Surely it is time for us to stand up and be counted, or are we too preoccupied and scared of damaging our impact factors for 바카라사이트 next research assessment?

MALCOLM ALISON CA바카라 사이트 추천RINE SARRAF Royal Postgraduate Medical School Hammersmith Hospital PS. One of us did receive a mug at Christmas from a grateful publisher.