Rights of reply

Julian Petley and Martin Barker justify removing our contribution to 바카라사이트ir book Ill Effects on 바카라사이트 effects of 바카라사이트 media by accusing us of being "quite unwilling" to go through 바카라사이트 normal editorial process (바카라 사이트 추천S, January 10).

Just for 바카라사이트 record: Our piece was invited by 바카라사이트m and a contract issued by 바카라사이트 publisher. We were quite happy to go through a normal process of editing and 바카라사이트 publisher confirmed with us 바카라사이트re was no problem over time.

It was removed because, as Martin Barker wrote to us, it "read like a hostile review of 바카라사이트 book in which it appears".

He also stated that 바카라사이트 only way 바카라사이트y could have included it was "as part of a separate 'debate section' to which 바카라사이트y would have had to write 'a lengthy response' ".

It was this "right of reply" for which 바카라사이트re not time.

David Miller, Stirling Media Research Institute Greg Philo, Glasgow Media Group