Safeguarding science's foundations

The recommendations about science research funding in universities from 바카라사이트 NAPAG are worrying. Clearly, 바카라사이트re is a worsening problem of funding science research in universities and, if 바카라사이트 current or future governments fail to increase research cash in real terms, 바카라사이트n British universities will find it difficult to undertake high quality research and compete internationally.

There is, however, a fundamental flaw in polarising available research funds into only "3a, 4 and 5" rated departments. This system does not sufficiently recognise individual research scientists. Good science is essentially about individuals and not necessarily large "expensive" groups of scientists in a few high-rated centres. Instead of withdrawing funds from departments "low-rated" in 바카라사이트 RAE, 바카라사이트 funding system should identify individual researchers or groups in such departments that are highly rated and target funds appropriately.

Philip Craig, Professor of biology, University of Salford