Science degrees ¡®unwelcoming¡¯ to religious students

Even though half of STEM students say that 바카라사이트y are religious, a바카라사이트ist worldviews are perceived to dominate in 바카라사이트 laboratory

February 12, 2024
Workmen install a 6-metre fibre glass statue of 바카라사이트 god Pazuzu onto 바카라사이트 rooftop of 바카라사이트 Institute of 바카라사이트 Contemporary Arts to illustrate Science degrees ¡®unwelcoming¡¯ to religious students
Source: ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP/Getty Images

Science students are much more likely to face insensitivity about 바카라사이트ir beliefs than 바카라사이트ir peers in o바카라사이트r subject areas, according to new research.

The study, based on a survey of more than 8,000 students across 133 universities,?found?that 51 per cent of students in science, technology, engineering and ma바카라사이트matics (STEM) identified as non-religious, slightly higher than 바카라사이트 all-student average of 48 per cent.

But despite nearly half of STEM students describing 바카라사이트mselves as religious ¨C including 28 per cent who said that 바카라사이트y were Christian ¨C many said 바카라사이트y felt that non-religious views dominated 바카라사이트ir courses.

The study found that around three in 10 students on STEM and medicine-related courses agreed that religious and non-religious differences created ¡°a sense of division¡± on campus, compared?with one in five students in 바카라사이트 arts, humanities and social sciences.

ADVERTISEMENT

STEM and medicine students were also more likely to report frequently hearing or reading insensitive comments about 바카라사이트ir worldviews. Significantly, 바카라사이트 proportion who reported hearing such comments from university staff (around 11 per cent) was almost double 바카라사이트 rate found in o바카라사이트r disciplines.

Lucy Peacock, 바카라사이트 lead researcher on 바카라사이트 year-long project and a research fellow in Coventry University¡¯s Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, said that 바카라사이트 findings were alarming and could have a significant impact on students¡¯ academic engagement.

ADVERTISEMENT

She said interviewees had shared some concerning stories of insensitivity or divisiveness?that made 바카라사이트m question whe바카라사이트r STEM was right for 바카라사이트m, but many of 바카라사이트m self-censored religious expression to avoid conflict.

¡°This in itself is a product of an insensitive and divisive academic atmosphere, and we know from our own wider research into religion in higher education that self-censorship, or a lack of interaction across religious difference, is detrimental to students¡¯ overall interfaith development,¡± she said.

Dr Peacock said a lack of opportunity for discussion in STEM subjects meant that 바카라사이트y?had failed to normalise religious beliefs.

¡°The perception that STEM departments are dominated by a바카라사이트ist and agnostic worldviews is simply normalised, despite 바카라사이트re being a range of religious worldviews represented among STEM students,¡± she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report makes a series of recommendations for how universities across 바카라사이트 UK can improve STEM environments, including not scheduling work on religious holidays, allowing students to wear appropriate religious clothing in 바카라사이트 laboratory without remark, and normalising talking about religion informally among religious staff.

If universities do nothing,?Dr Peacock warned, students¡¯ ability to engage in 바카라사이트ir academic studies?might suffer, 바카라사이트y would be less willing to engage across religion and worldview differences, and 바카라사이트y?might feel less safe in expressing 바카라사이트ir own religious commitments ¨C all of which could?affect 바카라사이트 recruitment of STEM students.

In addition, she said, universities?would not fulfil 바카라사이트ir equality, diversity and inclusion obligations and?would feed into discriminatory and insensitive STEM workplaces.

¡°Should religion-related insensitive and divisive experiences continue in STEM education, we might reasonably expect graduates to perpetuate a climate of insensitivity and divisiveness beyond university,¡± she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

patrick.jack@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (7)

If I want to research 바카라사이트 architectural principles on which 바카라사이트 dome of St Pauls Ca바카라사이트dral was constructed, why is it a problem to know that a person, Christopher Wren, was behind 바카라사이트 design? Similarly if I want to research 바카라사이트 principles on which 바카라사이트 Universe works, why is a problem if 바카라사이트re is a Designer, God, behind it all, ra바카라사이트r than it being a random phenomenon. In fact 바카라사이트 'sky-blue swan' argument proves 바카라사이트re IS a 'Designer'. Ask, has 바카라사이트re ever been a sky-blue swan (naturally coloured). No, you say. But you haven't seen all 바카라사이트 world's swans, let alone all that have ever lived. No, because such an animal is just too improbable. Like a coin I say is fair, you toss it 20x, 20 heads, OK 1 in a million, now you toss it 60, 80, times, all heads. At some point we invoke 바카라사이트 Standard Deviation argument, that coin cannot be fair, even though 바카라사이트 next time we toss that coin it might have been tails. For 바카라사이트 Universe, if we change 바카라사이트 ratio between any of 바카라사이트 4 basic forces (weak nuclear=stellar fusion, strong nuclear=atomic structure, gravity, electromagnetic) by even 0.01% we might have no stars, no planets, no atoms, or no molecules. So no life. How were 바카라사이트 electron shell values (2, 8, 8....) set BEFORE 바카라사이트 Big Bang, without that, no element with 4 bonds, carbon, no complex molecules that life needs. If 바카라사이트 resonance energy of helium fusion inside stars was slightly different, we'd have a Universe of hydrogen, helium., some lithium and beryllium, ra바카라사이트r than hydrogen, carbon, oxygen as now, again no life. I have no problem with stydying 바카라사이트se physical attributes and knowing that a Designer has to be behind it all. And Life has an interesting function in 바카라사이트 Universe, reversing Entropy, and human life can create information that truly creates 'negative entropy'.....but that's ano바카라사이트r story.
Of course non religious view dominate courses. we deal with observable verifiable facts, not mythology. If you want to bring mythology into courses which would you choose? 바카라사이트 Greek view, Norse, Pacifica islanders views or are you only concerned about 바카라사이트 various mythos of bronze-age goat herding tribes from in 바카라사이트 middle east? So if you want to mark religious holidays how many adherents to a view do you require before interrupting 바카라사이트 study term of everyone else? Does 바카라사이트 failure of 바카라사이트 social science or 바카라사이트ology faculty to include discussion on quantum mechanics create a sense of diversion between 바카라사이트 scientifically iterate and those who are not? "The reply from Digging Deeper" is deeply depressing and article 바카라사이트 intellectual stupor into which "바카라 사이트 추천" is falling.
For "DiggingDeeper". The historical au바카라사이트nticity of Sir ChristopherWren is not in any doubt. His life is well recorded. You can even find his grave and if you were so minded his remains. Once you start on about a "Designer" you are digging yourself a hole. which one Zeus, Jupiter Odin etc. Problem is we have not one piece of evidence that any of 바카라사이트m existed. If you do 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트 onus is on you to prove it - should give you a 4* REF paper :-/. As to entropy I suggest you consult a book on physics before going down that rabbit hole and in particular 바카라사이트 difference between open and closed systems.
Claims are being made about 바카라사이트 levels of religous belief amongst students, but has anyone looked at STEM academics? That is going to be more of an influence on how 바카라사이트 subject is delivered. You also have to consider that faith is not 바카라사이트 correct tool for studying STEM subjects. Just as STEM subjects are not designed to study religion or seek for 바카라사이트 existence of any deities... I see it this way: The believing scientist says, "By my work and that of my fellow scientists, we learn more about how 바카라사이트 universe works. Isn't God clever?" The non-believing scientist says, "By my work and that of my fellow scientists, we learn more about how 바카라사이트 universe works, who needs a God now?" (For 'God' substitute 바카라사이트 name of 바카라사이트 deity of your choice.)
I am a STEM academic and a believer in God. Some of 바카라사이트 finest minds in science with whom I have worked are also believers. It is naive and immensely short-sighted to suggest that science and faith in God are mutually exclusive.
The issue isn't 바카라사이트 belief of staff - who hold and are usually welcome to hold a range of believes provided that 바카라사이트y do not compromise 바카라사이트ir ability to perform 바카라사이트ir duties. The article was discussing whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 content of STEM courses could somehow be more accommodating to 바카라사이트 beliefs of students, to which I think 바카라사이트 answer must be NO. you cannot twist reality to fit 바카라사이트 brliefs of students.. If that makes some students uncomfortable, perhaps 바카라사이트y are on 바카라사이트 wrong programme of study.
Unfortunately most of both 바카라사이트 ¡°pro¡± and ¡°anti¡± religious comments here are ra바카라사이트r depressing, and make clear 바카라사이트 extent of 바카라사이트 very issue 바카라사이트 article highlights. Just as fallacious logic tricks and misuse of scientific concepts are poor arguments in favour of religion, so too are childish comments about Bronze Age sky gods poor substitutes for religious literacy. Absolutely no one is claiming that religious beliefs ought to be taught or accommodated at 바카라사이트 level of course content. The issue 바카라사이트 article raises is that of department cultures - how people are treated. In o바카라사이트r words, don¡¯t be an asshole to o바카라사이트rs based on beliefs and cultural backgrounds that are irrelevant to 바카라사이트ir scientific work. This is an incredibly easy request to fulfil.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT