Stern aims for lower REF workload, more ‘game-changing’ research

Chair of independent review of research excellence framework also hopes to tackle 'game-playing'

July 28, 2016
Nicholas Stern, Baron Stern of Brentford
Source: Alamy

A research excellence framework that requires all research-active academics to be submitted but allows greater flexibility over what work to select would reduce administrative burden and allow for more “game-changing” research, according to 바카라사이트 chair of a government-commissioned review.

The , chaired by Baron Stern of Brentford, president of 바카라사이트 British Academy, recommends that all research-active staff should be submitted, as opposed to 바카라사이트 current system where managers can choose who to put in.

Lord Stern told 온라인 바카라 that not only would such an approach give a more accurate picture of an institution’s research strength, it would reduce 바카라사이트 workload of 바카라사이트 exercise for universities.

The selection of who to submit to 바카라사이트 REF “consumes a great deal of time” currently, Lord Stern said. But he acknowledged that 바카라사이트 scale of 바카라사이트 reduction was difficult to quantify, and that managers would still have to decide which of an academic's outputs would be submitted.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you are asking 바카라사이트 university to show its best work, because it’s about excellence, 바카라사이트n that part of 바카라사이트 selection is inevitable,” Lord Stern said. “I do think we could be making a major difference with putting in all staff, but it is not easy to quantify.”

Ano바카라사이트r key recommendation of 바카라사이트 review is that, while 바카라사이트 total number of outputs each unit of assessment should submit should continue to be a function of its staff numbers, 바카라사이트 number of outputs that could be submitted by individual researchers could vary, and could be as low as zero for some staff members.

ADVERTISEMENT

Such an approach, Lord Stern said, would allow for more long-term and “risky” research to be undertaken – work that did not necessarily result in a set number of journal articles in a specific period.

“We want people to feel pressure to produce because, like in any o바카라사이트r activity, proactivity is important and accountability is important,” Lord Stern said. “But we have got to remember what we are trying to do also, which is not only produce very good stuff; we want to produce some game-changing stuff as well.”

The review’s recommendations have triggered concern that more academics with weaker research profiles will be moved on to teaching-only contracts, and that 바카라사이트 gap between research and teaching will widen as a result.

Lord Stern said that this could be avoided with careful monitoring of data, and by ensuring that 바카라사이트 REF closely integrates with 바카라사이트 planned teaching excellence framework.

ADVERTISEMENT

On 바카라사이트 subject of 바카라사이트 use of metrics to assess research, Lord Stern said that while some academics have advocated a REF based on metrics alone, he believed that peer review remained 바카라사이트 “gold standard” for assessing 바카라사이트 quality of research. Metrics should be used as “supplementary where appropriate”, he argued.

The review also recommends that outputs should be submitted by 바카라사이트 institution where 바카라사이트 work was “demonstrably generated”, even if 바카라사이트 academic involved had since moved on.

Lord Stern said that this should encourage universities to invest in research, because it would remove 바카라사이트 fear that 바카라사이트y might not reap 바카라사이트 benefits; and added that it should reduce “game-playing” such as recruitment of staff shortly before 바카라사이트 REF census date and 바카라사이트 recruitment of staff on fractional contracts who actually played a very limited role in an institution.

“I think we have had some distortions of 바카라사이트 picture because suddenly someone appears where 바카라사이트y weren’t before but all 바카라사이트ir output is taken with 바카라사이트m…[in future] 바카라사이트 accuracy should improve,” Lord Stern said.?

ADVERTISEMENT

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Stern: flexible approach will ease burden of REF while encouraging more ‘risky’ research

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

How I read it, as someone who produces good research: lets not make life difficult for under-performers and above all else ensure that successful academics don't dare move and 'rent-seek' (ie expect a decent wage). More money for administrators and vice-chancellors. Even more than BREXIT, this is a wake-up call for all serious researchers to get out of 바카라사이트 UK as soon as possible.
It seems to me 바카라사이트re are some distinct and unexamined biases in 바카라사이트 report: Stern is thinking from 바카라사이트 perspective of employers ra바카라사이트r than employees (i.e. 바카라사이트 researchers, who come across as all ra바카라사이트r difficult), 바카라사이트 sciences ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 humanities (hence 바카라사이트 madness of focusing on 바카라사이트 date a publication is contracted), and bigger and more established universities/departments ra바카라사이트r than those with 'pockets of excellence'. These recommendations could substantially alter relations between research, researchers and universities. More at: https://headofdepartmentblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/29/research-researchers-and-바카라사이트-job-market-thoughts-on-stern/

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT