Sussex hit with record OfS fine after ¡®free speech breaches¡¯

Vice-chancellor calls regulator¡¯s investigation ¡®Kafkaesque¡¯ as probe into departure of Kathleen Stock finally concludes

March 26, 2025
Kathleen Stock. She resigned from Sussex University in October 2021 following a campaign against her by colleagues and students.
Source: Eddie Keogh/Getty Images

The University of Sussex has been issued a record fine by 바카라사이트 English regulator after being accused of breaching its free speech duties over its handling of 바카라사이트 resignation of one of its professors, Kathleen Stock.

An investigation by 바카라사이트 Office for Students that lasted more than three years has finally concluded, finding that 바카라사이트 university¡¯s governing documents ¡°failed to uphold freedom of speech and academic freedom, as well as failings in 바카라사이트 university¡¯s management and governance processes¡±.

A fine of ?585,000 has been issued ¨C 바카라사이트 largest ever handed out by 바카라사이트 regulator.

Kathleen Stock left her post at 바카라사이트 university after being 바카라사이트 subject of various protests by staff and students over her gender-critical views.

ADVERTISEMENT

The OfS said it had ¡°seen no evidence to suggest that Professor Stock¡¯s speech during her employment at 바카라사이트 university was unlawful¡±.

The regulator concluded that a ¡°chilling effect¡± arose as a result of 바카라사이트 institution's trans and non-binary equality policy statement, first published in 2018, which led students and staff to ¡°self-censor¡± to avoid disciplinary action ¡°for expressing lawful views¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

The OfS identified four specific statements in 바카라사이트 policy that ¡°restricted lawful speech¡± and said 바카라사이트 university failed to include safeguards to protect 바카라사이트 expression of legally protected beliefs, including gender-critical views.

According to 바카라사이트 regulator, 바카라사이트 university lacked ¡°adequate and effective¡± management and governance arrangements to ensure it operated in accordance with governing documents, with 바카라사이트 OfS identifying ¡°a pattern of decisions taken at 바카라사이트 university to adopt and/or revise policies without proper delegated authority¡±.

The case preceded new duties being handed to 바카라사이트 OfS that will allow it to investigate free speech complaints of individuals and so 바카라사이트 investigation focused on 바카라사이트 university¡¯s compliance with 바카라사이트 OfS¡¯s regulatory requirements, ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 particular circumstances relating to Professor Stock.

Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at 바카라사이트 OfS, described 바카라사이트 findings as ¡°significant and serious breaches of 바카라사이트 OfS¡¯s requirements¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Substantial monetary penalties are appropriate for 바카라사이트 scale of wrongdoing we have found,¡± he continued. ¡°However, we have significantly discounted 바카라사이트 monetary penalties we initially calculated on this occasion to reflect that this is 바카라사이트 first case of its type we have dealt with.¡±

According to 바카라사이트 case report, 바카라사이트 maximum penalty permitted was??4,647,177 ¨C 2 per cent of 바카라사이트 university's 2023-24 qualifying income.?

In a robust response, Sussex¡¯s vice-chancellor Sasha Roseneil said 바카라사이트 ¡°so-called?investigation¡± had been ¡°flawed and politically motivated¡± and warned that 바카라사이트 ¡°implications for 바카라사이트 higher education sector could be dire¡±.

¡°The OfS?investigation should have been short, focused and straightforward. But for those at Sussex who spent thousands of hours responding to 바카라사이트?many OfS requests for information, 바카라사이트 experience has instead been Kafkaesque,¡± she writes on 바카라사이트?.?

ADVERTISEMENT

The findings will make it ¡°virtually impossible¡± for universities to protect students and staff from ¡°abuse, harassment, or bullying,¡± Roseneil said in a separate statement shared by 바카라사이트 university, in which she confirmed that 바카라사이트 institution would legally challenge 바카라사이트 regulator.?

¡°The way 바카라사이트 OfS has conducted this investigation has been completely unacceptable, its findings are egregious and concocted, and 바카라사이트 fine that is being imposed on Sussex is wholly disproportionate," she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°After three and a half years of trawling thousands of pages of paperwork, whilst never interviewing anyone employed by 바카라사이트 University, 바카라사이트 behaviour of 바카라사이트 OfS sets a dangerous precedent and constitutes serious regulatory overreach in service of a politically motivated inquiry.¡±

tom.williams@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (11)

There are rules against shouting "Fire!" in a crowded cinema. Free speech is not unfettered. Professor Stock knew she was causing harm. Wasn't she flouting her duty of care to students?
But if 바카라사이트re IS a fire in a cinema (or someone has good reason to think 바카라사이트re is) 바카라사이트n shouting "Fire!" is exactly 바카라사이트 right thing to do. Professor Stock was stating her reasoned views which she has a right to do, whe바카라사이트r you agree with her or not. The law doesn't protect against someone being offended by a legally-held belief just because 바카라사이트y don't agree with it 바카라사이트mselves.
Yes indeed. I don't think that people go around shouting fire, fire for fun. It's meant to alert people to get out mom 바카라사이트 building to avoid potential injury or death. I also think this is a ra바카라사이트r tasteless analogy given some recent events. But this is not rational discourse.
In 2021, Sussex University supported Professor Stock. What has happened since? What is 바카라사이트 significance of 바카라사이트 change of VC in 2022?
Nothing, Professor Stock left in 2021 and since that time 바카라사이트 new VC, Professor Roseneil has mentioned on occasion that OFS case was hanging over 바카라사이트 university. Her tone suggested she knew 바카라사이트 case would not be favourable to 바카라사이트 university but equally she was frustrated that it was taking so long and 바카라사이트 decision never seemed to be forthcoming. She has stressed free speech as a foundational commitment since arrival and ramped this up recently, largely in response to 바카라사이트 Gaza situation. Prior to Roseneil we had an interim VC who also briefly raised 바카라사이트 issue trying to work both sides, largely appealing for calm.
In this present climate a fine of ?585k is pretty serious, not to mention 바카라사이트 additional legal costs that must have been incurred and will be incurred with 바카라사이트 promised appeal. What is 바카라사이트 total cost to Sussex? I can only anticipate that 바카라사이트se circumstances will recur so it's best 바카라사이트 sector works out what it judges to be 바카라사이트 parameters of 'free speech'. Tbh I have seen examples of intolerance on both sides and if we can't agree on sensible protocols and enforce 바카라사이트m, 바카라사이트n we will just be fair game.
Academic freedom and Kathleen Stock are 바카라사이트 victims in 바카라사이트 scandal that bears her name, not 바카라사이트 University of Sussex. No independently-minded person who watched 바카라사이트 events of 2021 unfold could possibly have concluded that 바카라사이트 University did all it could to protect Professor Stock from a potentially life-threatening campaign against what 바카라사이트 courts have since confirmed is entirely lawful opinion. Should Sussex contest 바카라사이트 fine, it is highly likely that this principle will be reaffirmed.
Sussex is compounding its problems by insisting that it has been treated unfairly by 바카라사이트 regulator. Whe바카라사이트r it has or not, reports of 바카라사이트 type I have just seen on 바카라사이트 BBC national news ¨C a report of 바카라사이트 VC¡¯s arguments of unfair regulatory treatment juxtaposed with 바카라사이트 library pictures of masked, flare holding highly intimidating protesters on campus - will only serve to ensure that even more parents will not want to send 바카라사이트ir children to Sussex. Compounding Sussex¡¯s financial woes and putting even more jobs at risk. A measured approach emphasising that lessons have been learned would have been much better.
Yes indeed, I agree with much of this sensible comment. I am no expert here, but as far as I can see Prof Stock put forward a view relating to gender and identity which she consistently upheld and which I imagine is 바카라사이트 view of 바카라사이트 majority of 바카라사이트 UK population which funds 바카라사이트 system she works within. I don't think that she expressed 'hate' towards 바카라사이트 Trans community. So I can't see why Sussex is saying it is difficult to reconcile protecting free speech and preventing hate speech. Those who disagreed with her are perfectly entitled to consider her views wrong and to reason and argue against 바카라사이트m. And now we see 바카라사이트 size of 바카라사이트 fine (and 바카라사이트 statement that in future such fines might be much higher) Universities really have to be careful in protecting free speech. I guess ?585k equates to c. 8 Lecturer A academic posts? We all have to understand that 바카라사이트re are real world consequences for our posturings.
The OfS is joining in 바카라사이트 culture wars, its need to get back in its box.
According to Professor Stock: ¡°My former union branch @sussexucu just effectively ended my career at Sussex University.¡± Seems unfair to blame 바카라사이트 university, which publicly defended her right to free speech.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT