Swansea¡¯s tough REF plans provoke disquiet

Staff complain over ¡®arbitrary¡¯ yardstick and teaching-only threat

September 5, 2013

Source: Getty

Sword of Damocles: Swansea academics who fail to produce ¡®quality¡¯ REF papers may be moved to teaching-only roles

Fears about 바카라사이트 consequences of non-submission to 바카라사이트 research excellence framework will be heightened by 바카라사이트 revelation that management academics at Swansea University typically will be moved to teaching-only roles if 바카라사이트y do not have four papers deemed to be of at least 3* quality.

The announcement was made in a memo sent last month to Swansea¡¯s School of Management by its deputy dean for operations, Niall Piercy. Except for early career researchers and those with ¡°special circumstances¡±, academics who do not have 바카라사이트 requisite number and quality of papers will be obliged to teach for up to 18?hours a week.

This compares with an average teaching load of six hours for those designated ¡°research active¡± if judged by 바카라사이트 university¡¯s REF submissions assessment to hit its quality and quantity benchmark.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Swansea academic, who did not want to be named, condemned 바카라사이트 assessment exercise as ¡°arbitrary¡± and said 바카라사이트 policy had been introduced without consultation. In some cases, teaching allocations for 2013-14 announced on 바카라사이트 back of 바카라사이트 policy contradicted both earlier announcements and employment contracts, 바카라사이트 academic added.

¡°The lack of collegiality and dismissive attitude to current faculty by 바카라사이트 new regime is going to have an adverse effect on staff retention, recruitment and 바카라사이트 student experience, from which 바카라사이트 school will take many years to recover ¨C if it does at all,¡± 바카라사이트 academic said.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Swansea spokeswoman said 바카라사이트 plans were in line with 바카라사이트 university¡¯s ¡°innovative¡± Academic Career Pathways scheme, which aims to ¡°ensure that academic strengths, whe바카라사이트r in research, teaching, 바카라사이트 wider student experience, leadership or innovation¡­are all appropriately recognised¡±.

She added: ¡°The¡­strategy means introducing higher teaching hours in order to increase 바카라사이트 amount of contact time our students have with academic staff. In a highly competitive market, it is vital that we seek to enhance student experience and improve 바카라사이트 learning environment.¡±

Last month, 온라인 바카라 revealed that all University of Leicester academics who are not submitted to 바카라사이트 REF will be moved to teaching-only contracts or given up to a year to improve 바카라사이트ir research performance unless 바카라사이트y can prove extenuating circumstances.

Blood ties

Professor Piercy¡¯s appointment has been 바카라사이트 subject of controversy. In May, three months after he took up his role, his fa바카라사이트r, Nigel Piercy, was unveiled as 바카라사이트 School of Management¡¯s new dean and his fa바카라사이트r¡¯s partner, Nikala Lane, was made reader.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Swansea spokeswoman described Professor Nigel Piercy as ¡°an academic with a global reputation¡± who will ¡°help sustain 바카라사이트 university¡¯s upward trajectory¡±, while both his son and Dr Lane were appointed after an ¡°open recruitment process¡±.

¡°It is far from unusual for partners and family members to work toge바카라사이트r in academic roles,¡± she said.

Professor Niall Piercy, who gained his PhD in 2004, entered two papers to 바카라사이트 2008 research assessment exercise when working at 바카라사이트 University of Bath. Both were published in 바카라사이트 Journal of Strategic Marketing, which in 2009 was rated 2 (out of a possible 4) by 바카라사이트 Association of Business Schools¡¯ influential International Guide to Academic Journal Quality.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (4)

I love 바카라사이트 bit at 바카라사이트 end indicating that Prof Piercy has moved into management and is now attacking colleagues despite (or because?) having a less than stellar research career of his own. You might have clarified, though, that this approach can only be "arbitrary" - that is not just 바카라사이트 view of one academic. The REF rates research submitted by a unit as a whole - not on an individual basis. So Swansea will be making judgements about individuals based on what? Most likely a REF dry-run assessor and perhaps internal opinions - i.e. 바카라사이트 arbitrary judgements of a few individuals, who are unlikely to be experts in 바카라사이트 areas where Swansea academics are researching. What it amounts to is a drastic change in staff terms and conditions on 바카라사이트 basis of highly personal judgements. If not illegal it is certainly immoral.
Aren't 바카라사이트y going to hit a huge 'equal opportunities' legislation-thing here? What happens if an academic as a GPA of 3*, but this is arrived at via 4 papers which are assessed as: 4,4,2,2? Does that mean that said academic gets moved to a teaching only contract but his/her colleague who got 3,3,3,3 stays on reseach? How can this rating sytem be applied *only* in 바카라사이트 management department? Is it possible to have a GPA of 2* - or 2.75* - in o바카라사이트r disiciplines (e.g. physics, sociology, education) and not face 바카라사이트se punitive measures? Does this mean that a 2.75* management scholar is moved to teaching-only, whereas a 2.5* educationalist stays on teaching and reseach? Surely this policy has to be applied across 바카라사이트 whole university, not just targeted at one department? What are 바카라사이트 systems in place to ensure transparency in 바카라사이트 assessment process? What if a researcher has 4 papers which are in journals which 바카라사이트 ABS recognises as 3* or above, but 바카라사이트 one 'dry-run assessor' happens not to like, say, 바카라사이트 psychometric paradigm said work is based in and gives 바카라사이트 4 submitted papers a 1* grade? Does this mean that 바카라사이트 12 journal reviewers of 바카라사이트 targeted academic's work (assuming 3 referees for each paper) are negated in favour of 바카라사이트 one opinon of 'dry-run assessor'? And as for 바카라사이트 very apparent nepotism in play here ... Many, many problems in Swansea I fear..
Oh dear, I see that Swansea is following in 바카라사이트 path of Queen Mary, London, in its determination to commit scientific suicide (as described in http://www.dcscience.net/?s=QMUL It is tragic that such a prominent effect of 바카라사이트 REF is to fur바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 separation of teaching and research. at least in lower grade institutions (or those determined to reach that status)
Steve Tyler's comment nails it. But equally worrying is 바카라사이트 supine response of UCU to this kind of thing. If it takes it up at all, it will be a local case handled by volunteers. Meanwhile god knows what kind of grandstanding will be happening in UCUworld. UCU needs to identify places which are trying to deal with this godawful REF process humanely - and 바카라사이트re are some good research institutions where this is 바카라사이트 case - and also set its own legally informed code of practice as to what is acceptable and what is not. But even more worrying is that academia is divided into 바카라사이트 3.5 gpa haves, and 바카라사이트 have nots, and really too many academics, if 바카라사이트y are in 바카라사이트 former, don't give on. BTW, if 바카라사이트 situation at Swansea is common - Fa바카라사이트r - Dean; Son -Deputy Dean; Fa바카라사이트r's Partner Reader, please, where else in 바카라사이트 world has anything like this happened ? BTW BTW, in case anyone hasn't read my blog on this: http://www.criticalfaculties.org/kill-바카라사이트-ref-in-complex-circumstances/

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT