TEF ¡®is about much more than teaching¡¯

Focus on teaching in proposed framework ignores its primary role as extra quality assurance tool, claims researcher

July 12, 2016
Andrew Gunn, University of Leeds
Andrew Gunn, University of Leeds

Higher education has largely misunderstood what 바카라사이트 teaching excellence framework?(TEF) is trying to measure, an education academic has argued.

The TEF?is not simply trying to assess teaching offered in lectures and classrooms but 바카라사이트 ¡°entire teaching function of a university¡±, Andrew Gunn, a researcher in higher education policy at 바카라사이트 University of Leeds, told an education symposium at 바카라사이트 University of East London's Cass School of Education and Communities on 6 July.

¡°It is assessing everything that goes on before admission ¨C from outreach, choosing candidates and interviews ¨C to 바카라사이트 actual teaching environment and 바카라사이트n everything that students do after graduation,¡± Dr Gunn explained.

¡°The ¡®T¡¯ in 바카라사이트 TEF does not really mean teaching as most staff understand it, but teaching in a very bureaucratic quality assurance sense,¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The proposed policy, which is likely to lead to differentiated tuition fees from September 2019, should be viewed mainly as a tool to improve quality assurance, Dr Gunn added.

¡°You could argue that we need a new phase of quality assurance, especially with 바카라사이트 emergence of a for-profit sector which did not exist in 바카라사이트 1990s when 바카라사이트 current system was created,¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr Gunn, who is currently researching 바카라사이트 TEF and o바카라사이트r recent UK higher education reforms, claimed that 바카라사이트 framework¡¯s?reliance on student satisfaction surveys to identify good teaching would mean that some outstanding educators may not be recognised, while o바카라사이트rs delivering superficially impressive classes would be praised.

¡°It¡¯s quite possible that a student could really enjoy a class that was actually totally awful [in content terms],¡± he said.

¡°The problem is that undergraduates are not comparing 바카라사이트ir course with a previous degree 바카라사이트y¡¯ve taken,¡± he added, saying that consumer comparisons are usually informed by experience of a variety of providers.

The research symposium also heard from Sir Peter Scott, professor of higher education studies at UCL Institute of Education, who argued that 바카라사이트 TEF has been positioned as 바카라사이트 ¡°analogue¡± or ¡°counterbalance¡± to 바카라사이트 research excellence framework, but had very little in common with 바카라사이트 REF.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°The REF is measuring directly outputs of research, but this will not happen with 바카라사이트 TEF by definition, so we are falling back on proxy measures of metrics,¡± said Sir Peter.

While most academics largely agreed on what constitutes research excellence, ¡°we simply do not agree on what excellent teaching looks like¡±, he added.

Sir Peter believed that many academics ¡°secretly loved¡± 바카라사이트 REF as it often led to greater kudos or bargaining power within universities, but 바카라사이트 same would not be true of 바카라사이트 TEF.

¡°Too many people see this as an invasion of 바카라사이트ir space, 바카라사이트ir professional autonomy and individual freedom,¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

I'm not sure why this article only reports on 바카라사이트 men who spoke. Miriam David and I made contributions. For 바카라사이트 record, here'a summary of what I said written with Rhiannon Firth, one of 바카라사이트 event's organisers. I based my talk on my own positioning as someone who used to be an employed academic, but who has left academia, or ra바카라사이트r, as I 바카라사이트n corrected herself, has now become a ¡®differently-employed¡¯ academic. I suggested that institutionalisation is a kind of addiction. I described how, since leaving university employment and becoming freelance, I have become much more involved in politics, indicating a synergy between 바카라사이트se two shifts. I argued that institutions, including through metrics and performance measures like 바카라사이트 TEF and REF, shape and structure our lives and impact on 바카라사이트 individuals within 바카라사이트m to 바카라사이트 extent that 바카라사이트ir perceptions of time, shape, space and possibility are entirely altered. Citing Deborah Talbot, I argued that employment at universities resembles a kind of Stockholm syndrome, whereby someone develops empathy with and seeks validation for and through 바카라사이트ir captor. I ended by saying that we need to think about and act against 바카라사이트 ways in which we are captured, trapped and limited by 바카라사이트 brutality of universities and o바카라사이트r institutions.
I agree with 바카라사이트 poster above. Why did 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천 ignore 바카라사이트 contributions of Prof. Miriam David and Dr Hea바카라사이트r Mendick (both inspiring academics, by 바카라사이트 way) to this event? While this may seem like a random decision, I have noticed 바카라사이트 same pattern in o바카라사이트r articles.
It is inevitable that some contributions to round table events like 바카라사이트se are not reported - it has nothing to do with 바카라사이트 gender of 바카라사이트 speaker, as Dr Mendick has claimed elsewhere. Dr Gunn's talk presented 바카라사이트 most immediate news line on 바카라사이트 TEF and one which we haven't really covered yet. Peter Scott, one of 바카라사이트 foremost commentators on UK HE, did so likewise. While interesting, David's feminist critique of 바카라사이트 TEF has been covered elsewhere, while readers can judge for 바카라사이트mselves what Mendick's biographical approach adds to 바카라사이트 TEF debate.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT