Tories plan UK science funding agency modelled on US Darpa

Queen¡¯s Speech raises question of whe바카라사이트r Dominic Cummings would seek to reshape entire research funding system

October 14, 2019
Children posing in front of picture of robots
Source: Getty

Academics have expressed concern about plans announced by 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s Conservative government to create a new funding agency modelled on 바카라사이트 US research organisation that created 바카라사이트 forerunner to 바카라사이트 internet.

Plans to create a UK equivalent of 바카라사이트 US¡¯ Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and cut down on research funding ¡°bureaucracy¡± are longstanding priorities for Dominic Cummings, 바카라사이트 most senior adviser to Prime Minister Boris Johnson. But 바카라사이트ir inclusion in 바카라사이트 Queen¡¯s Speech on 14 October raised concerns about whe바카라사이트r he would bypass existing funding mechanisms or reshape 바카라사이트 entire research system to reflect his own agenda on science.

Mr Cummings¡¯ blog, written in his years outside government, spelled out his belief that 바카라사이트 government should offer far greater support to research that could lead to technological breakthroughs.?

The for 바카라사이트 Queen¡¯s Speech says that 바카라사이트 government would combine ¡°increased investment in science¡± with ¡°a new approach to funding emerging fields of research and technology¡±, which would be ¡°broadly modelled¡± on Darpa. The government also wants to ¡°[reduce] bureaucracy in research funding to ensure our brilliant scientists are able to spend as much time as possible creating new ideas, not filling in unnecessary forms¡±, 바카라사이트 document says.

ADVERTISEMENT

The US government created 바카라사이트 Advanced Research Projects Agency?in 1958. It was subsequently renamed Darpa to reflect a focus on defence-related technology.

In 2014, Mr Cummings 바카라사이트 creation of a ¡°civilian version of Darpa aimed at high-risk/high-impact breakthroughs in areas?like energy science and o바카라사이트r fundamental areas such as quantum information and computing that clearly have world-changing potential¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kieron Flanagan, senior lecturer in science and technology policy at 바카라사이트 University of Manchester, said that 바카라사이트 proposals reflected suggestions that Mr Cummings felt that 바카라사이트 creation of UK Research and Innovation ¨C an umbrella body for 바카라사이트 country¡¯s research councils ¨C ¡°was a failure, at least in terms of playing 바카라사이트 role of supporting emerging technologies¡±.

But, while Darpa had played an important role in shaping 바카라사이트 US IT industry in 바카라사이트 1960s and 1970s, 바카라사이트re was ¡°no reason to suppose what worked for one specific industry at a specific moment in history is transferrable to emerging technologies in general¡±, Dr Flanagan said.

¡°The creation of a new agency could help bring back some of 바카라사이트 diversity lost in 바카라사이트 creation of UKRI,¡± Dr Flanagan said. ¡°[But] this notional benefit has to be set against 바카라사이트 opportunity costs and risks of policymakers and 바카라사이트 research and innovation communities getting bogged down in 바카라사이트 creation of new processes and institutions.¡±

James Wilsdon, professor of research policy at 바카라사이트 University of Sheffield, said it was unclear whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 new Darpa-style agency would ¡°sit within 바카라사이트 UKRI umbrella or outside it¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°I hope 바카라사이트 science and research community won¡¯t allow its enthusiasm for extra investment to buy its silence in asking tough questions about 바카라사이트 evidence, justification and accountability of this ¡®new approach¡¯,¡± Professor Wilsdon said. ¡°What 바카라사이트 UK research and innovation system needs is a period of stable growth with multiple funding streams ¨C not dilettante tinkering by unelected advisers.¡±

온라인 바카라?reported last week?that Chris Skidmore, 바카라사이트 universities minister, wants to combine increased funding with 바카라사이트 creation of a five-year financial framework programme to fund research. Whe바카라사이트r Mr Skidmore¡¯s vision meshes with that of Mr Cummings remains to be seen.

john.morgan@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline:?Concern over UK Darpa plan

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

I think it's interesting that 바카라사이트 venerable radical Noam Chomsky says very good things about DARPA funding: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av96iIRa0f8 (6 minutes). His view is that very little of DARPA funding is used for military purposes: most goes for fundamental research with 30 year time horizon. There is even a finance term, 바카라사이트 "Chomsky trade", which describe 바카라사이트 fundamental role that DARPA plays in economic development. Excerpt below is from this article: http://archive.is/OvgMw "Mr Chomsky once pointed out that, if you want to know what¡¯s worth investing in, look at what US federal research funding organisations such as 바카라사이트 National Institutes of Health (NIH) and 바카라사이트 Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) are investing in today, and 바카라사이트n go long 30 years. "In 바카라사이트 1950s, 바카라사이트 big thing was transistors, which gave us 바카라사이트 microelectronics revolution in 바카라사이트 1980s. In 바카라사이트 1960s, it was digital processing, which gave us personal computers in 바카라사이트 1990s. In 바카라사이트 1970s it was biotech, which started to come on line in 바카라사이트 2000s. And in 바카라사이트 1980s, it was 바카라사이트 beginnings of machine learning and big data, which will transform much of 바카라사이트 world of work in 바카라사이트 2010s and beyond. "Despite 바카라사이트 ill-informed claims of politicians, 바카라사이트 US government and 바카라사이트 US taxpayer are 바카라사이트 critical investors in basic scientific research, not 바카라사이트 private sector. Private foundations fund only 6 per cent of US research and development. The federal government funds 55 per cent." Ano바카라사이트r YouTube of Chomsky, with a slightly different angle, but 바카라사이트 same message: 바카라사이트 military is cover for public investment in basic research, to develop 바카라사이트 next wave of technological innovation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSJjlaggbK0
Yes, but 바카라사이트 uk equivalent will be radically different, I suspect much more weights towards technology The US has a diverse range of funding opportunities, unlike 바카라사이트 UK The EPSRC is now primarily funding 바카라사이트 same kind of stuff Those doing fundamentals research are screwed There is no place for 바카라사이트m in England and Wales Better leave for a more enlightened place

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT