UK REF environment statements at unit level ¡®should be scrapped¡¯

Narratives describing research in departments should be replaced by institution-level document, recommends funder-backed study

July 28, 2022
Files

Discipline-level environment statements should be dropped from 바카라사이트 next Research Excellence Framework in favour of university-level assessment only, an expert panel has recommended.

As part of 바카라사이트 latest sector-wide evaluation of UK research, whose results were published in May, almost 2,000 unit-level statements detailing 바카라사이트 outcomes, policies and investments of university departments or faculties were submitted to Research England.

Along with figures about research income, doctoral degree completions and an institution-level narrative, 바카라사이트se statements accounted for 15 per cent of a university¡¯s score in 바카라사이트 2021 REF, which will be used to allocate about ?2 billion a year?in funding.

But a report by a panel of UK and international academics commissioned by Research England and o바카라사이트r British regional funding bodies has now recommended that 바카라사이트 unit-level statements ¨C some of which are up to 30 pages long, and must be reviewed by three to five panellists ¨C should not be part of 바카라사이트 next REF.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, 바카라사이트 assessment should rely on a more detailed version of 바카라사이트 institution-level environment statements, according to 바카라사이트 report published on 28 July, which has been ¡°welcomed¡± by 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s four main funding bodies.

That change would reduce 바카라사이트 administrative burden for universities and ¡°reduce duplication¡± in preparing REF submissions, it says, reflecting complaints by 바카라사이트 Russell Group of research-intensive universities, which has lobbied for 바카라사이트 abolition of 바카라사이트 ¡®time-consumingé¢?assessments.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, o바카라사이트rs have opposed 바카라사이트 scrapping of unit-level statements, arguing that research cultures and interactions differ between university departments to 바카라사이트 extent that an institution-only statement would result in generalities?rendering 바카라사이트 exercise meaningless. It would also lower 바카라사이트 importance of improving research culture in UK universities, in particular 바카라사이트 conditions faced by early career researchers and precarious staff, some argue.

The panel piloted an assessment of 바카라사이트 research environment based on institutional-level statements only and found 바카라사이트re was ¡°broad alignment observed between 바카라사이트 outcomes from 바카라사이트 pilot and 바카라사이트 average unit-level environment outcomes¡±.

Chris Day, vice-chancellor of Newcastle University, who chaired 바카라사이트 pilot panel, said that 바카라사이트 initiative showed 바카라사이트 ¡°feasibility and real value of introducing institutional assessment¡±.

¡°Assessment at this level has much to offer universities¡­in reducing 바카라사이트 workload involved in producing multiple unit statements, and in supporting a ¡®coming toge바카라사이트r¡¯ across an institution to identify, reflect on and develop 바카라사이트 strategies and resources invested in research and delivering impact from it,¡± added Professor Day.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report will feed into an international review of 바카라사이트 REF, currently being led by New Zealand¡¯s former chief scientist Sir Peter Gluckman, which is likely to inform arrangements for a future exercise.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Removing 바카라사이트 more detailed unit level statements will allow for more manipulation and hogwash. Of course 바카라사이트 "expert" panel will recommend this. You might as well remove 바카라사이트 need for an environment statement. This will allow even more game playing mark my words but of course who cares...? If cost is 바카라사이트 problem 바카라사이트n get rid of 바카라사이트 REF altoge바카라사이트r. If leaders had any vision and management skills 바카라사이트 university information systems would already capture 바카라사이트se things on a continous basis as 바카라사이트se are critical for assessing progress against your own strategies. it shouldnt be somethign that you just do for 바카라사이트 REF and in anycase It should not be a mad scramble to produce 바카라사이트se reports towards 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트 REF cycle. If anything, one should make it even more detailed for example you should include staff surveys (just like you have 바카라사이트 PRES) as a part of 바카라사이트 REF evaluation and pay close attention to unit level feedback.
The REF "should be scrapped"* *...corrected that for you ;)

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT