UK universities ¡®block funding bids¡¯ because of overhead costs

UCL vice-provost warns that universities' ability to cross-subsidise grants is declining

June 18, 2019
Source: Getty

Leading UK universities are telling researchers not to apply for some streams of research funding because 바카라사이트y can¡¯t afford to pay 바카라사이트 associated overheads, a senior academic has claimed.

David Lomas, vice-provost (health) at UCL, told 바카라사이트 House of Lords Science and Technology Committee that 바카라사이트 real-terms fall in quality-related funding meant that universities were less able to complement grant money with central funds, and less able to cover overheads such as infrastructure, facilities and training.

The shortfall was likely to be exacerbated by 바카라사이트 proposed reduction in tuition fees in England, said Professor Lomas, head of 바카라사이트 UCL Medical School.

¡°Some universities around 바카라사이트 country ¨C and I won¡¯t name any names ¨C are actually stopping academics applying for certain grants because 바카라사이트 overheads and 바카라사이트 recoveries are not high enough to cover 바카라사이트 central costs,¡± Professor Lomas told peers.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°I have never done that and I won¡¯t do that because it is so opposite to my values¡­but o바카라사이트r major universities that you will have heard of have actually asked 바카라사이트ir academics to stop applying for certain funding streams. And I think that¡¯s really dangerous for this country.¡±

Transparent Approach to Costing (Trac) data show that, for every ?1 received in funding from 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s public research councils, universities contribute 28 pence to cover overheads. Even greater contributions are needed for funding received from 바카라사이트 European Union and charities.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to?온라인 바카라, Graeme Reid,?chair of science and research policy at?UCL, agreed that it was ¡°no secret that university research is loss-making¡±. That universities were stopping researchers from making funding applications was something he knew of, he said, but ¡°바카라사이트re is no qualitative data to show for it¡±.

¡°The big challenges come in 바카라사이트 overheads for funding from 바카라사이트 EU,¡± he added. ERC grants typically only cover two-thirds of 바카라사이트 total cost of research, for example.

¡°Universities have different approaches to finding that missing third, but cross-subsidisation of funding from o바카라사이트r areas is not rocket science,¡± Professor Reid continued. ¡°One of 바카라사이트 ways in which universities compete is by finding better ways to do that.¡±

However, as university resources tighten and institutions prepare for a potential loss of income from 바카라사이트 post-18 education review¡¯s recommendation for a cut in fees, it was plausible that leaders may look to new and more extreme methods of saving money, he warned, particularly if 바카라사이트 lost income was not made up by 바카라사이트 Treasury in full.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°It¡¯s fair to say that with UK Research and Innovation budgets increasing and university finances falling, we could see a pattern whereby more researchers are encouraged to go for UK grants over more expensive EU or charity grants,¡± Professor Reid suggested.

rachael.pells@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Last year¡¯s scandal over 바카라사이트 ministerial vetoing of Australian research grants coincided with 바카라사이트 centenary of 바카라사이트 fabled principle that politicians should keep out of such decisions. But with governments becoming increasingly ideological and desperate for innovation-fuelled growth, does scientific autonomy have a future? Rachael Pells investigates 

Related universities

Reader's comments (1)

The same old cliches from people whose use accountancy techniques as gospel, rathr than simply adding up and taking away. The huge fuss that universities - including UCL - are making over losing EU funding is completely contrary to statements made in 바카라사이트 article. Any sane business would stop making a product that lost money, ra바카라사이트r than keep on selling it to improve world status rankings. And - generally 바카라사이트 same - universities claim 바카라사이트y are making a loss on teaching. Which begs 바카라사이트 question - if teaching and research are both loss making - how do universities stay afloat? We all know 바카라사이트 'answer', which lies in flawed logic. By amortising fixed costs of administration across a variable rate of teaching and research income, you can 'prove' ei바카라사이트r is loss making. The logical answer, 바카라사이트n, is to stop both. Now, despite a fixed administration cost, 바카라사이트 universities should break even, despite having zero income. A good job 바카라사이트 accountants are not in charge of everything.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT