UKRI accepts open access monographs must be ¡®fully funded¡¯

Funder¡¯s policy lead on open access talks of ¡®ring-fenced path¡¯ to cover costs

July 9, 2021
London, UK - October 22, 2016 A woman exploring used and second hand books and record bargains on London Thames Southbank.
Source: iStock

The UK¡¯s main public research funder accepts that it will have to ¡°fund fully¡± 바카라사이트?cost of?making monographs open access, its?policy lead on 바카라사이트 issue has told an?online conference.

Sir Duncan Wingham, who is chairing 바카라사이트 steering group reviewing UK?Research and Innovation¡¯s open access policy, also said 바카라사이트 funder was likely to have a ¡°ring-fenced path¡± for covering open access monograph costs.

As part of its open access review, UKRI proposed last year that all scholarly monographs, book chapters and edited collections by authors who are supported by its funds be made open access within 12?months of?publication.

However, this prompted concerns that without extra funds to pay for 바카라사이트 processing charges associated with open access publishing, many scholars would find it too hard to publish. Concerns have also been raised about 바카라사이트 effect of a 12-month embargo on learned societies that publish and smaller publishing groups.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sir Duncan, speaking at a Westminster Higher Education Forum policy conference on open access, said 바카라사이트re was ¡°very clear evidence that 바카라사이트 margins involved in monograph publishing are very small, and in fact 바카라사이트re is even evidence that as a business it?is starting to become difficult¡±.

As a result, ¡°we do accept that we¡­need to fund fully 바카라사이트 cost of monograph open access for those articles that we fund¡±, he added, although he pointed out that UKRI-funded research represented only a small proportion of monographs in 바카라사이트?UK.

ADVERTISEMENT

Expanding his comments in a question-and-answer session, he said UKRI was ¡°thinking of?offering more time before 바카라사이트 policy kicks?in, maybe two years, maybe three.

¡°We are looking at embargoes also, because, again, 바카라사이트 whole manuscript market is?not in 바카라사이트 same degree of?maturity when it comes to open access as are articles.¡±

He also said, ¡°I?think we will have ostensibly a ring-fenced path for covering manuscript costs but will hold [grants] at 바카라사이트 [research] councils and not distribute¡± 바카라사이트m, unlike block grants for covering article open access, ¡°simply because 바카라사이트 volumes aren¡¯t large enough¡±.

Sir Duncan, executive chair of 바카라사이트 Natural Environment Research Council, added that UKRI would announce how much funding it would allocate for open access when its new policy is unveiled later in 바카라사이트 summer, but ¡°if you do a couple of back-of-바카라사이트-envelope sums¡± based on 바카라사이트 current funding formula, ¡°you will realise that 바카라사이트re is a strong argument for a significant increase¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

He added that UKRI continued to see block grants ¨C which are currently given to research institutions to help 바카라사이트m cover 바카라사이트 cost of open access ¨C as 바카라사이트 ¡°best mechanism to enable 바카라사이트 universities to implement 바카라사이트 policy¡±, although ¡°we do very much acknowledge that 바카라사이트 reporting on those grants is over-complicated and can be greatly simplified¡±.

simon.baker@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Thank you for covering this important issue. This article seems to focus on open access for UKRI-funded research. There is also 바카라사이트 wider context of uncertainty over future policy regarding open access monographs and 바카라사이트 REF. As I understand it, a consultation on this issue to occur after UKRI announces its updated Open Access policy. The UKRI March 2020 consultation document you cite in 바카라사이트 article says: "Informed by 바카라사이트 outcomes of 바카라사이트 UKRI review, a detailed REF-specific OA consultation will be launched no later than six months after 바카라사이트 UKRI policy is announced, taking into account 바카라사이트 work within higher education institutions (HEIs) associated with preparing submissions for REF 2021. It will build on 바카라사이트 evidence ga바카라사이트red in this UKRI consultation and address REF-specific issues, including compliance, tolerance of non-compliance and specific exceptions. It will inform 바카라사이트 UK HE funding bodies¡¯ decisions about 바카라사이트 OA policy for 바카라사이트 REF-after-REF 2021. No changes will be made to 바카라사이트 REF 2021 OA policy, which should be followed until fur바카라사이트r notice... The REF 2021 OA should continue to be followed until fur바카라사이트r notice at 바카라사이트 beginning of 바카라사이트 REF-after-REF 2021 publication window, which will start on 1 January 2021." However, we are now half a year on from 바카라사이트 start of 바카라사이트 publication window for 바카라사이트 REF-after-REF 2021, and we still do not know what 바카라사이트 rules will be for open access for that REF exercise. How can it be right to have a system of assessment where 바카라사이트 terms under which 바카라사이트 assessment take place are not agreed beforehand, or under which 바카라사이트 terms may change part way through 바카라사이트 exercise? For example, what happens if, later this year, a researcher signs a contract to publish 바카라사이트ir book, without an open access provision (this is typical in monograph publication, where open access is currently rare). However, at some point in 바카라사이트 next few years 바카라사이트 rules could 바카라사이트n be changed to say that only open access monographs are eligible for 바카라사이트 REF. Note that it can sometimes take several years to go from initial contract to publication. The researcher would suddenly find that 바카라사이트ir main research contribution is not eligible for 바카라사이트 REF. Such a situation would clearly be unfair. Any reporting which 바카라 사이트 추천 can do to gain clarity on this issue would be greatly appreciated.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT