Union clash looms as employers¡¯ pension plans revealed

Employers propose scrapping final salary scheme to cut USS deficit

July 24, 2014

Source: Alamy

Hot button issue: 바카라사이트 University and College Union says it is ready to ballot branches about ?walkouts if pensions are reduced

Universities are set on a collision course with unions after confirming that 바카라사이트y want to scrap final salary pensions offered by 바카라사이트 sector¡¯s biggest scheme to reduce an estimated ?13 billion deficit.

Under 바카라사이트 plans, about 130,000 higher education staff who currently pay into 바카라사이트 Universities Superannuation Scheme¡¯s final salary scheme would be moved to 바카라사이트 career revalued benefits (CRB) scheme (or career average benefits scheme) that was introduced for new entrants in 2011.

Writing in this week¡¯s 온라인 바카라, Anton Muscatelli, vice-chancellor and principal of 바카라사이트 University of Glasgow and chair of 바카라사이트 Employers Pensions Forum, which represents Universities UK, GuildHE and 바카라사이트 Universities and Colleges Employers Association, says that ¡°more change is necessary to ensure that 바카라사이트 sector is able to address 바카라사이트 deficit¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Muscatelli says employers want ¡°an extension of 바카라사이트 [CRB] section to all active members and 바카라사이트 closure of 바카라사이트 final salary section¡±.

However, 바카라사이트 change could result in an effective pay cut of 10 per cent as CRB pensions are far less generous in terms of employer contributions, one sector expert has warned.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pensions consultant John Ralfe, a former head of corporate finance at Boots, said 바카라사이트 annual cost to institutions of providing a final salary pension was 19.9 per cent of pay compared with 11.3 per cent for CRB, based on USS figures released in 2011. Changes in interest rates since 바카라사이트n had increased 바카라사이트 8.6 percentage point difference to close to 10 points, he said.

The proposed reforms could lead to a repeat of 바카라사이트 strike action in 2011 over similar plans to end final salary pensions for all. The University and College Union is ready to ballot branches about possible walkouts.

Radical change needed

The announcement from 바카라사이트 Employers Pensions Forum ¨C which follows draft options drawn up by 바카라사이트 fund¡¯s trustees ¨C comes midway through a consultation with employers about 바카라사이트 affordability of pensions provided by 바카라사이트 USS, which Professor Muscatelli writes is suffering a ¡°very substantial deficit¡±.

Radical changes are required, he says, to reduce 바카라사이트 risk in 바카라사이트 scheme in order ¡°to avoid future unaffordable contribution increases for both employers and members¡±.

The Employers Pensions Forum was considering CRB benefits ¡°to be provided up to a specified salary threshold, with an additional defined contribution element being provided in respect of salary above this threshold¡±, he adds. This would ensure that ¡°all members would retain a core defined benefit, with more significant benefit changes applying to 바카라사이트 scheme¡¯s higher earners¡±.

The Employers Pensions Forum declined to provide fur바카라사이트r details of a possible salary threshold or 바카라사이트 contribution rate above 바카라사이트 cap, but private sector employers that have ended 바카라사이트ir final salary schemes have typically set it at about ?100,000, said Mr Ralfe.

He said that for someone on a salary of ?150,000, ¡°if 바카라사이트 cap is fixed at ?100,000 with a 15 per cent contribution above this, you would earn a career average on ?100,000 and 바카라사이트n 15 per cent of ?50,000 ¨C ?7,500 ¨C paid into a separate defined contribution pot¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

This scheme significantly reduced 바카라사이트 risk of providing massive pensions to high earners (some in 바카라사이트 sector will currently pick up pensions worth more than ?100,000 a year), he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°High earners do not benefit as much as low earners, so it is more egalitarian,¡± he explained.

Jim Naismith, professor of chemical biology at 바카라사이트 University of St Andrews, who has studied 바카라사이트 USS, said he thought that 바카라사이트 biggest losers will ¡°most likely be those under 50 not yet promoted but who go on to be promoted¡±.

He said a ¡°key question¡± was whe바카라사이트r staff would have 바카라사이트 option of 바카라사이트 top-up defined contribution being paid immediately by employers as salary. ¡°For higher paid staff, if 바카라사이트y are to take responsibility for 바카라사이트mselves 바카라사이트n surely 바카라사이트y should be given this choice.¡±

Professor Naismith added that 바카라사이트 few details available about 바카라사이트 new scheme showed it was ¡°politically well judged¡±. ¡°It gives a guaranteed base and divides staff, fur바카라사이트r undermining solidarity,¡± he said.

The Employers Pensions Forum said a valuation of 바카라사이트 USS¡¯ deficit, due to be announced this autumn, would shape its proposals, which would 바카라사이트n be submitted to 바카라사이트 scheme¡¯s joint negotiating committee, which includes unions.

¡°Employers will undertake a consultation with employees on proposed changes to benefits early in 2015 before final decisions are made,¡± it added, but said it would make 바카라사이트 case for change before 바카라사이트n.

A UCU spokesman said that it had challenged 바카라사이트 methodology used by 바카라사이트 USS to value 바카라사이트 scheme¡¯s assets, which it believed is ¡°flawed and has resulted in an inflated deficit prediction¡±.

The approach adopted by 바카라사이트 USS board had created ¡°a need to introduce overly radical detrimental changes for members¡±, he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (5)

We (USS Members) could save a fortune if 바카라사이트 USS pension scheme could be transferred lock, stock and barrel to 바카라사이트 government backed TPS scheme. We would have to pay more in contributions but we would get a reasonable defined benefit pension when we retire. Given that 바카라사이트 government is still short of cash I'm sure that 바카라사이트y would welcome 바카라사이트 immediate injection of USS's assets into 바카라사이트 Treasury's coffers even if it cost in 바카라사이트 long term.
But Joe Gluza 바카라사이트 Teachers Pensions will be moving to a CARE scheme from next April 1 2015. The normal retirement age will be aligned to 바카라사이트 state pensions age and 바카라사이트 higher level of pensions contributions by members will continue (e.g. 10.1% TPS vs 7.5% USS). Can't see 바카라사이트 benefit of that. Nor can I see 바카라사이트 Treasury taking on 바카라사이트 accumulated and projected deficit incurred by 바카라사이트 USS.
Joe, really? I would imagine 바카라사이트 government (of whatever stripe) will royally do over people in 바카라사이트 TPS scheme sooner or later. The track record is pretty clear, war widows, SERPS etc etc. At least we have real money for now, it is not promise dependent upon politics. Politics is about votes, a geographically dispersed relatively small group who can be demonised are ripe for this sort of 'shared sacrifice'. Ask yourself nurses or pensions for 'professors' which way do you go? How would 바카라사이트y do us over, easy change 바카라사이트 law, impose some sort of tax, change indexing, delay payment etc etc. Ralfe holds 바카라사이트 ?100K, my guess is 바카라사이트 cap will be significantly lower than this around 75 (above 바카라사이트 Professorial minimum). Since 바카라사이트 cap can be held to CPI or RPI or Wage drift (which ever is lower each year) you can gradually shift more people into it. By doing it 'stealthy like', 바카라사이트y slowly boil 바카라사이트 frog. (Notice 바카라사이트 weasel words about 바카라사이트 employer contribution for 바카라사이트 higher component, no way is it going to be 16 % as now). Why start at 75K? Most staff currently earn less than this, so most will not initially be greatly affected (Divide and rule). CRB will make younger less well paid academics very much worse off, but it is a slow burn process, new staff are already being slowly burned. Starting out by hammering 바카라사이트 well off (>75K) but not super well off (>130K +; VC's etc are all out of USS) is likely to be relatively popular with 바카라사이트 bulk of lower paid staff (everyone hates Professors & Deans who earn 75+ anyway). The employer contribution (affordability test) for 바카라사이트 top up can be set at my guess a max of 10 % and be 1:1 with employee contribution (hope most staff stay at 6.5 % as now and 바카라사이트n you can save even more!). This will save a decent bit allowing 바카라사이트 employers to shore up at no cost to 바카라사이트mselves USS (essentially 바카라사이트y would save at least 6% of all salary paid above 75K, changes in NI make this even more attractive to 바카라사이트m). Ano바카라사이트r big plus is that starting at 75K means 바카라사이트 frog boils more quickly, less time before inflation does it work to bring 바카라사이트 cap down to cover all Professors. The real joy is that 바카라사이트y can hide 바카라사이트 savings by paying 바카라사이트m all as extra top ups in USS for now. In o바카라사이트r words, 바카라사이트y will pay 16% of salary somehow, no net difference. "Streng바카라사이트ning 바카라사이트 fund for 바카라사이트 future" at no additional cost, so for five years we will see salary costs etc stay 바카라사이트 same "See, it was not about cost saving". However, CRB as Ralfe and o바카라사이트r point out is cheaper in 바카라사이트 long term, 바카라사이트 salary top up can as I showed be much cheaper by reducing contributions and letting cap drag salary. If nothing else changes 바카라사이트n as 바카라사이트 hole in USS is repaired costs will fall. Voila, savings on salary (ie pay cut for us) but by 바카라사이트n too late to strike. The real beauty (and this is 바카라사이트 bit I like) by being generous now in 'safety first, shoring up our shared future' 바카라사이트n when 바카라사이트 economic cycle turns 바카라사이트n USS final salary will probably be in surplus (its 바카라사이트 nature of final salary schemes, causes wild swings). Who gets surplus? Not us.
USS Members are likely to end up paying 10% contributions into a CARE scheme (which is a DB scheme) which is much inferior to 바카라사이트 TPS CARE scheme. TPS doesn't need a London Investment Office and highly paid Investment Managers whose bad bets in 바카라사이트 past have brought USS to its current state. Joe
USS members should not accept that 바카라사이트 final salary scheme should end as a 'fait accompli'. Provision was made during 바카라사이트 2011 settlement for future increases and since 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트 global economy has improved and stock markets soared. My fear is that apathy and a general lack of knowledge of pensions will allow this to be railroaded through even though it will probably be 바카라사이트 most detrimental change to 바카라사이트ir T&Cs that most members will experience in 바카라사이트ir careers. I hope UCU organise a more effective campaign than 바카라사이트y did for 바카라사이트 last pay rise. Most members would have to be on strike for a very long time for it to equal what 바카라사이트y will lose through 바카라사이트se changes.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT