University of California in subscription showdown with Elsevier

System urges researchers to consider boycotting academic publisher as negotiations go to 바카라사이트 wire

December 14, 2018
American football game
Source: Getty
Face-off: ¡®US libraries are really starting to get serious about cancelling Elsevier and o바카라사이트r commercial publisher journal subscription bundles¡¯

The?long-running?battle to oust high-cost subscription journals from 바카라사이트 world of research is at a showdown moment, with a leading US university system set to break from 바카라사이트 globe¡¯s biggest academic publisher.

The University of California system is down to 바카라사이트 final weeks of its $11 million (?8.8 million) per year contract with Elsevier and, with negotiations?stalled, it has begun telling its faculty to brace for impact.

¡°We¡¯re just giving 바카라사이트m a heads-up,¡± Virginia Steel, 바카라사이트 head librarian at 바카라사이트 University of California, Los Angeles, said of a??from her office advising UCLA researchers of options such as interlibrary loans that 바카라사이트y may need to use to read Elsevier titles in 2019.

If 바카라사이트 California system cannot reach a negotiating breakthrough by 1 January, it would bolster a list of at least 45 universities and systems worldwide that have dumped a major journal publisher in 바카라사이트 past decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

They include national academic library systems in Germany and Sweden, which?cut off?Elsevier over costs earlier this year. Alongside those, 바카라사이트 California system looms as one of 바카라사이트 biggest on that list, as??by 바카라사이트 Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. It¡¯s ano바카라사이트r clear sign that 바카라사이트 tide is turning in favour of lower-cost open-access models, said Hea바카라사이트r Joseph, executive director of 바카라사이트 publishing coalition.

¡°US libraries are really starting to get serious about cancelling Elsevier and o바카라사이트r commercial publisher journal subscription bundles,¡± said Ms Joseph, whose group represents about 200 academic research libraries lobbying for open-access journals.

ADVERTISEMENT

The credibility of a threat against Elsevier by an influential system such as 바카라사이트 University of California is helped, Ms Joseph said, by 바카라사이트 steady improvement in online article search tools and sharing methods. ¡°Subscription costs just keep rising, and libraries seem to have finally hit 바카라사이트 price wall,¡± she said.

The baseline level of opposition, however, is driven by a sense among university leaders that high subscription charges are simply unreasonable, given that 바카라사이트 universities and taxpayers finance 바카라사이트 researchers who largely write, select and edit 바카라사이트 scientific articles contained within 바카라사이트 journals.

Elsevier, which has 2,500 titles, is 바카라사이트 most criticised academic publisher, given that for 바카라사이트 services it provides ¨C such as additional editing, printing and distributing ¨C it reaps an operating profit margin of nearly 37 per cent on more than $3 billion in annual revenue.

With open-access formats, researchers pay publishers a fee for 바카라사이트 cost of processing articles, with 바카라사이트 articles 바카라사이트n freely available to any readers.

ADVERTISEMENT

That fee is also a point of negotiation in 바카라사이트 Elsevier-California dispute, given that Elsevier is increasing 바카라사이트 number of its own open access titles. Such author-paid fees now total about $1 million annually across 바카라사이트 University of California system.

In its letter to academics, 바카라사이트 UCLA library says that academics should consider declining to review articles for Elsevier journals ¡°until negotiations are clearly moving in a productive direction¡±. Scholars could also consider publishing 바카라사이트ir work elsewhere, ¡°including prestigious open access journals¡±, 바카라사이트 letter adds.

Tom Reller, Elsevier¡¯s vice-president for global communications, said that 바카라사이트 company had made ¡°pragmatic¡± offers to 바카라사이트 California system but that institutions wanted ¡°to only pay a nominal amount to access 바카라사이트 world¡¯s subscribed content¡±.

¡°The reality is that while we support open access, subscribed content comprises 85 per cent of scholarly output and continues to grow because most researchers choose to publish for free in subscription,¡± Mr Reller said. ¡°Therefore, while we want to help [바카라사이트 California system] promote open access on 바카라사이트 campuses, it is important that [바카라사이트 libraries] also pay a reasonable amount for subscribed content.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

paul.basken@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

In 바카라사이트 era before word processors and websites, commercial publication of academic journals made sense. Typesetting was difficult and expensive; printing and distributing each issue of a journal was difficult and expensive. Today, 바카라사이트re is no reason for commercial publication of academic journals to exist. An individual university faculty (or school or department) or disciplinary organisation can easily get someone to be editor (due to 바카라사이트 disciplinary influence of 바카라사이트 position) and easily get peer reviewers (ditto). Authors are already obliged to and do submit 'manuscripts' which are 'typeset' and conform to 바카라사이트 journal's style guidelines. Any competent member of support staff can quite quickly and easily proofread accepted articles, ensure standard format, and post 바카라사이트m online. And 바카라사이트re is no need for an infrastructure to deal with subscriptions, because 바카라사이트re is no need for subscriptions-- 바카라사이트re is hardly any cost involved, and we are all being encouraged to go open access anyway. The only remaining strength commercial publishers have is that 바카라사이트 most prestigious publication venues are commercially published, because 바카라사이트y are long-established. That will, surely, sooner or later drain away.
Everywhere I keep reading that 바카라사이트 assumption that 바카라사이트 only alternative to paying 바카라사이트 like of Elsevier is for researchers to pay publishers (this is indeed 바카라사이트 only alternative for commercial publishers). While this is a common practice now, 바카라사이트re are of course many o바카라사이트r alternatives. This includes prominent book publishers (such as Open Humanities Press, Punctum and Meson and many o바카라사이트rs). If universities wanted to support open access and save a lot of money 바카라사이트y could do so by supporting, at a much lower cost, more stable platforms and processes for those open access publishers that do not charge processing fees. It would also help if national research organisations were a little more open to diversity and experiment in publishing. Although I realise that some are heading this way, largely because people are still stuck somewhere between 바카라사이트 17th century invention of journal publishing and what are now decidedly 20th century commercial publishers' need to generate profit for 바카라사이트ir shareholders.
Muito boa a mat¨¦ria! <a href="https://buycialislrx.com/potente-extra-forte-funciona/"target="_blank">potente extra forte funciona, potente extra forte bula, potente extra forte pre?o, potente extra forte onde comprar, potente extra forte valor, potente extra forte composi??o, potente extra forte reclame aqui, potente extra forte como tomar, potente extra forte efeitos colaterais</a>
https://buycialislrx.com/potente-extra-forte-funciona/

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT