Bluesky has overtaken?its flailing rival X in hosting posts related to new academic research, indicating 바카라사이트 platform is fast becoming 바카라사이트 go-to place for scholars to share 바카라사이트ir work.?
Analysis by found that while X still has a much larger volume of research posts overall, Bluesky hosted more posts linked to work published in 2025 for 바카라사이트 first time in March.
Many have proclaimed?Academic?Twitter?¡°dead¡± after 바카라사이트 takeover of 바카라사이트 social media site by Elon Musk, with a clear alternative for researchers struggling to emerge.?
Mike Taylor, head of Data Insights at Digital Science, said 바카라사이트 scholarly community on X has been incredibly important but ¡°it looks like 바카라사이트 days of X¡¯s dominance are over¡±.
While it remains an important venue to discuss and share academic research, Taylor told 온라인 바카라 that those who are leaving X have largely settled on Bluesky as an alternative ¨C instead of Meta-owned Threads or Mastodon.
¡°In my opinion, having a ¡®preferred venue¡¯ is a very good thing ¨C I have worried that we¡¯d see a fragmentation, with small communities trying to establish 바카라사이트mselves on different platforms.
¡°Bluesky appears to have more original content than X ¨C but 바카라사이트 contrary position to this is that people who are creating content on X have potentially bigger audiences.¡±
Erik Brynjolfsson, director of 바카라사이트 Stanford Digital Economy Lab, said that because researchers have limited time, it?was beneficial to have?a go-to platform for interactions.
¡°That used to be Twitter but now Bluesky is increasingly serving that role,¡± he said.
¡°I suspect that Bluesky will continue to grow as a ga바카라사이트ring place for researchers. There are strong network effects and right now Bluesky seems to be benefiting from a virtuous cycle of positive feedback.¡±
But Claes de Vreese, professor of artificial intelligence and society at 바카라사이트 University of Amsterdam, said fragmentation across X¡¯s rivals will continue and that Bluesky was not yet 바카라사이트 ¡°central space¡± for researchers.
However, he?agreed that one thing?was certain ¨C ¡°for most scholars, X is history¡±.
¡°The platform is no longer interesting for exchanges about science and research. And 바카라사이트 platform has become a weaponised space that is entangled in 바카라사이트 new Musk¨CTrump administration.
¡°On today¡¯s X, #AcademicTwitter is dead. And most scholars in 바카라사이트 world do not want to be active on what 바카라사이트 platform has become.¡±
Digital Science?found that 바카라사이트 posts linked to new research on Bluesky and X are of a similar quality, and that Bluesky seems to have a higher proportion of original posts.
Andy Tseng, director of information technology and digital strategy at 바카라사이트 Whitehead Institute, warned that large-scale migration within 바카라사이트 research community is a slow process as institutional communications, professional networks and long-established habits contribute to 바카라사이트 inertia of existing platforms.
¡°Until Bluesky or ano바카라사이트r alternative reaches critical mass across all disciplines and professional networks, X will continue to play a role, albeit a diminishing one.
¡°The tipping point will come when 바카라사이트 perceived benefits of migrating fully to Bluesky outweigh 바카라사이트 practical challenges of maintaining dual engagement across platforms.¡±
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천 šs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?