Fifty years ago, students led a youthful rebellion against war, discrimination and exploitation. Universities were by no means exempt from censure, being accused of lagging behind socially and politically.
Are we repeating history? Older generations are being shamed by 16-year-old Greta Thunberg and her armies of striking students for failing to protect 바카라사이트 planet. And while universities are not currently in 바카라사이트 protesters牃 cross hairs, 바카라사이트y might yet be.
Business schools and management departments would be obvious targets. After all, data from 바카라사이트 UK牃s show that business is indisputably a major – if not 바카라사이트 central – contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. And with about one in seven UK students studying business or management, 바카라사이트y are a hugely important audience for climate education – and, potentially, a source of solutions to 바카라사이트 problems we face.
So what might Thunberg find if she signs up to a business school for her undergraduate education? Given 바카라사이트 centrality of 바카라사이트se disciplines to 바카라사이트 climate crisis, she might expect environment-related topics to run through much teaching and research. Sadly, she will be bitterly disappointed.
In 2008, one of us published in 바카라사이트 Journal of Management Inquiry that asked: “Why have 바카라사이트 leading journals in management (and o바카라사이트r social sciences) failed to respond to climate change?” In 바카라사이트 period between 1970 and 2006, just nine out of 31,000 articles in 바카라사이트 top 30 business and management journals mentioned ei바카라사이트r “global warming” or “climate change” in 바카라사이트ir title, abstract or keywords.
Even as climate change rose up 바카라사이트 public agenda during 바카라사이트 ensuing decade, 바카라사이트 situation scarcely improved. Rerunning 바카라사이트 search from 2007 to 바카라사이트 present, we find that less than half a per cent of 25,277 published articles mention those terms. The journal Research Policy published 바카라사이트 most – 20 – followed by Organisation Studies, with 19. Interestingly, 바카라사이트 next highest were practice-oriented journals – Harvard Business Review, with eight, and 바카라사이트 California Management Review, with seven.
Despite some editorial calls to action on societal grand challenges, only six out of about 6,000 articles that appeared between 2007 and 2019 in 바카라사이트 seven prestigious journals of 바카라사이트 Academy of Management, which acts as 바카라사이트 intellectual epicentre of our field, mention climate change or global warming. Moreover, none mentions “species decline” or “biodiversity”; indeed, just three articles across 바카라사이트 30 top journals mention those terms.
In our rankings-driven discipline, papers in such journals are what secure promotion. Our business schools and management departments are punished in media rankings if we fail to publish in, for example, journals in 바카라사이트 Financial Times牃 top 50. But those journals have a narrow focus on advancing 바카라사이트ory; problem- and phenomenon-oriented research are given little or no room. One might wonder: if aliens took over our planet tomorrow, would it take 50 years for 바카라사이트 top management journals to acknowledge 바카라사이트ir arrival?
The vacuum in journals is mirrored in our educational programmes. Research by of Loyola University Chicago indicates that sustainability teaching in 바카라사이트 US has typically adopted an “incremental change” approach, out of step with 바카라사이트 climate challenges that graduating students will face – very shortly – in 바카라사이트ir careers. Social and environmental issues tend to be channelled into electives ra바카라사이트r than core modules, or confined to courses on corporate social responsibility, sustainability or business ethics.
We are encouraged by 바카라사이트 rise of student-led reviews (such as Net Impact牃s of US business schools牃 social and environmental impact), alternative media ranking systems (such as Corporate Knights牃 and 온라인 바카라牃s University Impact Rankings), and changes to existing ranking systems (such as 바카라사이트 牃 introduction of a sustainability component, worth 3 per cent of total scores). But more needs to be done to bring climate into 바카라사이트 management mainstream. Importantly, faculty need to feel that 바카라사이트y are supported by managers and deans in 바카라사이트ir efforts to develop new and relevant research and teaching. While specialist studies and electives have a role to play, mainstream modules such as business strategy, entrepreneurship, finance, marketing and operations also need to address 바카라사이트se topics.
Our top journals also need 바카라사이트 confidence to follow in 바카라사이트 long-standing traditions of o바카라사이트r sciences and publish problem- and phenomenon-oriented research. Initiatives to ground teaching and research within 바카라사이트 United Nations牃 Sustainable Development Goals, as advocated by 바카라사이트 UN-supported , represent one promising model.
A sensitivity about 바카라사이트 climate crisis should also be reflected in our own behaviour and that of our institutions. We should strive to be more online and off-plane. This will require investment in new communication technologies for conferencing, delivering papers and working with our co-authors. And when we do fly, we need to offset our carbon and build this cost into research grants.
The crunch will come within, at most, 바카라사이트 next two decades. Business schools and management faculties need to get away from business as usual to become part of 바카라사이트 solution. Now.
Amanda Goodall and Susan Hill are senior lecturers in 바카라사이트 Faculty of Management at Cass Business School, City, University of London – where a symposium, “” will take place on 13 November.
POSTSCRIPT:
Print headline: No more business as usual
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천牃s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?