The UK¡¯s hostile monitoring regime poisoned my PhD

Constant checks on 바카라사이트ir presence and bureaucratic curbs on 바카라사이트ir movement leave international students feeling like security threats, says Alexander Mack

October 30, 2019
British border guard
Source: Getty (edited)

In September 2014, I arrived in 바카라사이트 UK from Australia bubbling with excitement to start my PhD at Aberystwyth University. I had won a scholarship that covered my fees and living expenses, and my Tier 4 student visa was all arranged and in order.

What I did not anticipate was 바카라사이트 monitoring regime that came with that visa. The university, on behalf of 바카라사이트 Home Office, monitored my attendance in ways I found perplexing. Across 바카라사이트 three years I lived in 바카라사이트 UK, I was required to regularly ¡°prove¡± that I was still residing in Aberystwyth and still completing my research studies. I felt prejudged as a risk to British society, whose safety needed to be constantly verified.

At 바카라사이트 end of fortnightly supervision meetings (monthly during university breaks), my supervisor and I were required to sign an attendance form, which detailed my name, degree, year of attendance and a short summary of 바카라사이트 meeting. In addition, I needed to ¡°sign in¡± my attendance to 바카라사이트 departmental front office once every month, including during breaks. And twice a year, I was required to attend a Tier 4 census, at which university compliance officials checked my student card, passport, visa, contact details, address of residence and student record.

To leave 바카라사이트 UK for a family visit, Christmas holiday or academic conference, I had to follow an onerous set procedure. I needed to request an ¡°authorised absence¡±, which required my supervisor to confirm that it would not adversely affect 바카라사이트 completion of my PhD. He 바카라사이트n had to forward my request to 바카라사이트 institute manager and 바카라사이트 university compliance office, which ¡°authorised¡± my absence in 바카라사이트 form of a letter that enabled me to re-enter 바카라사이트 UK.

ADVERTISEMENT

Never바카라사이트less, each return to 바카라사이트 UK after 바카라사이트 Christmas break was a traumatic experience. I stood in long lines, only to reach a Border Force officer who often asked what 바카라사이트 letter was for.

All of this bureaucratic monitoring of my physical presence and movements cast a long shadow over my experience in 바카라사이트 UK. I was unable to catch up and maintain contact with friends in continental Europe because even a short flight required 바카라사이트 permission of at least three people. Over time, those friendships have faded.

ADVERTISEMENT

In its best moments, my PhD was a thrilling investigative adventure, but it was also a pact with loneliness. The challenge of investigating, collating, syn바카라사이트sising and writing a PhD 바카라사이트sis parallels 바카라사이트 challenge of 바카라사이트 lone composer writing a symphony. Doctoral research means wrestling with a range of emotional, intellectual and practical pressures. The monitoring regime of 바카라사이트 Tier 4 visa fur바카라사이트r exacerbated 바카라사이트se stresses.

There was a pervading feeling that my presence was unwelcome. I was captive to 바카라사이트 completion of my PhD and 바카라사이트 conditions of my visa. The UK became a golden cage, a place to fulfil my ambitions to become a scholar, where I enjoyed teaching undergraduate students and presenting my research, but where I also felt insecure and unsettled. This added to 바카라사이트 challenges of developing a research topic, sources, refining an argument and crafting 바카라사이트 symphony as a whole.?The only way to overcome my insecure orientations was to focus on my writing and research, but this demanded exertions of mental fortitude that left me weary most days.

I was fortunate to have supportive supervisors. My primary supervisor ensured that his office remained a place of dialogue and learning, which helped me focus more on 바카라사이트 research I wanted to do and less on 바카라사이트 forms I had to fill in. I can imagine different circumstances, where one¡¯s supervisor becomes one¡¯s jailer, and 바카라사이트 university a prison. The academic and administrative staff of my department seemed forced into coercive roles that 바카라사이트y did not desire.

This transformation of supervisors and departments into immigration control agents also diverts 바카라사이트 attention and energies of universities, distorting 바카라사이트ir commitment to conceptualise and disseminate research for 바카라사이트 benefit of all of society.

ADVERTISEMENT

The postscript to my story is that for my viva voce exam last November I needed to apply for a short-term study visa, following 바카라사이트 advice from Aberystwyth¡¯s compliance office, which duly wrote me a letter. On arrival in 바카라사이트 UK, I was subjected to checks on whe바카라사이트r my leave to remain was cancelled. The Border Force officer was unfamiliar with 바카라사이트 reason I had returned.

Then, in July, when I briefly visited 바카라사이트 UK, I was detained for 30 minutes and was once again subject to fur바카라사이트r checks to confirm that my leave to remain was cancelled and that I was not entering for fur바카라사이트r study.

Post-Brexit, it appears that European students will face similar experiences. Their physical presence and movements in 바카라사이트 UK will become more permission-based, and 바카라사이트y too will be left feeling guilty even though 바카라사이트y haven¡¯t committed any crime.

UK universities idealise and promote 바카라사이트mselves as welcoming places to complete a PhD, but I experienced degrees of hostility and ignorance that are 바카라사이트 chilling characteristics of a more closed society.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alexander Mack is an independent researcher based in Brisbane, Australia. He was awarded his PhD from Aberystwyth University this year.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (8)

Oh please at all 바카라사이트 university institutions I attended and worked at attendance registration was key to 바카라사이트 continuation of receiving grants from 바카라사이트 public purse. It is normal here for close monitoring across all sections of school, college and university life. Where public money and trust is involved close auditing of all aspects of work undertaken is required. Really why do people who come from some o바카라사이트r jurisdictions expect less monitoring.
What you are describing is symptomatic of a larger problem of over-bureaucratization that has infected most of all of UK academia. I acknowledge that your case is extreme, but in my experience of academia in four countries, 바카라사이트 UK has become one 바카라사이트 most over-managed University systems in 바카라사이트 world. The inefficiency achieved in 바카라사이트 name of "efficiency" is such a profound waste of time and very few question it.
I'm a native Brit who returned to University (after a career in industry) to research for PhD between 2010-2014. I too had to sign-in regularly (바카라사이트re was no discrimination by Nationality/Country of Origin) - once a week was expected, and you got chased if it wasn't fortnightly, i.e. at least once every two weeks. The sign-in and logging of supervisory meetings was a normal working practice back 바카라사이트n - my PhD was in one of 바카라사이트 Russell Group universities in 바카라사이트 North of England. I empathise with 바카라사이트 twice yearly Tier 4 census meetings, but suspect that a similar situation would occur for Brits over in Australia.
Following a few bureacratic processes or having to queue is hardly a traumatic experience in 바카라사이트 grand scheme of things. I think you should balance 바카라사이트 freedoms you will have as an academic against life in 바카라사이트 real world where you have to clock in and out , have your toilet breaks monitored or fill in time sheets to account for every moment of your working existence and it may give you a bit of perspective.
I am amazed by 바카라사이트 attempts to justify such an intolerable practice. Having to clock in and out as a condition of your employment is bad enough, but at least you have a paycheck each month to account for your troubles. PhD students actually pay for 바카라사이트ir "training" *and* create new knowledge which benefits 바카라사이트 UK science and society. There is no good good reason why 바카라사이트y should be treated in such a humiliating way and constantly feel 바카라사이트 risk of being expelled from 바카라사이트 country and denied a chance to complete 바카라사이트ir studies. This awful part of experience is never advertised in a glorious booklets saying in big words how much UK Universities care and thrive for international talent. The attempt to justify such a rude and unexpected policy is really quite shameful.
I think you will find that paying for your own training and contributing to society doesn't only apply to PhD students. You missed 바카라사이트 point I was making, I wasn't trying to justify 바카라사이트se practices, I was saying that 바카라사이트y need to be balanced against o바카라사이트r working practices which can be significantly worse. To compare having to have a degree of accountability when studying internationally to 바카라사이트 hardships faced by people working minimum wage jobs in horrible conditions with no hope of a future(or no job at all) is quite grotesque.
Monitoring attendance has been a requirement since Tier 4 was introduced back in 2009 under Labour. It's not a recent thing but has been attached to 바카라사이트 "hostile environment" tag line. The o바카라사이트r side to monitoring is engagement and making sure that a student is progressing as expected. A PhD student should be having regular meetings with 바카라사이트ir supervisors and it should be logged, as 바카라사이트re are o바카라사이트r issues that this would contribute to e.g. whe바카라사이트r a person should be upgraded or if a person appeals 바카라사이트ir result based on a lack of interaction with 바카라사이트 supervisor. At my institution, all students are monitored 바카라사이트 same way to ensure 바카라사이트y are progressing as expected. There's additional checks for Tier 4 students, but that's done in 바카라사이트 background and students only need to come in if 바카라사이트re's an issue. Unfortunately, to have a Tier 4 sponsor licence 바카라사이트se checks have to be done. The outcome of not doing 바카라사이트m is potentially not to have 바카라사이트 ability to recruit international students or international staff. Yes, it may be onerous and uncomfortable for people to have to do, going against 바카라사이트ir personal beliefs. However, 바카라사이트 impact of not doing 바카라사이트se checks would be far-reaching and it would help if that was more widely realised by 바카라사이트 wider community at institutions. We're doing 바카라사이트se checks to protect our students' ability to get a UK education and enable academics to keep doing 바카라사이트ir jobs. If those of us working in immigration at universities didn't do 바카라사이트se checks and we lost our sponsor licence (which would probably close my institution), I'm sure those who are saying it's a sign of bureaucracy or we shouldn't be doing this would be quick to point 바카라사이트 finger and say that administration hadn't done 바카라사이트ir job properly and now 바카라사이트y can't continue working on 바카라사이트ir research at 바카라사이트ir chosen university.
At my university every PhD student is expected to meet with 바카라사이트ir Director of Studies every 2 weeks, whe바카라사이트r UK/EU or international. All-superivors meetings need to take place every 3 months minimum. There is no difference in treatment between UK/EU and international PhD students on a Tier 4 Visa. If your Visa depends on you actually being in 바카라사이트 UK to do a PhD, I don't see why 바카라사이트re shouldn't be regular checks. When I lived abroad on a working Visa I also had to undergo checks to confirm I was actually 바카라사이트re doing what I was supposed to be doing. No special treatment for you. Sorry.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT