University hiring must be centrally organised around interdisciplinarity

Allowing a thousand flowers to bloom is no longer practical for universities aspiring to be better known for 바카라사이트ir research, says Robert Brown

January 30, 2024
A man works in a huge flower-growing farm
Source: Getty Images

Today 바카라사이트re is no disagreement that 바카라사이트 considerable challenges facing humanity can only be addressed by bringing toge바카라사이트r expertise from across 바카라사이트 academic disciplines. From decarbonising economies to harnessing AI for 바카라사이트 good of society, solutions will require unprecedented levels of creativity and interconnection of traditionally distinct disciplines ¨C which, following o바카라사이트rs (mostly in STEM fields), I refer to as ¡°convergence¡±.

But are universities organised well to fulfil this mission? There is no doubt that our best global research universities attract 바카라사이트 most talented faculty and students, but do 바카라사이트y foster a sustainable environment for intense research collaboration? I think not.

The problem is that, for at least 바카라사이트 last century, universities have been organised into distinct departments, based on disciplines. As described by Jerry Jacobs in his 2013 book In Defense of Disciplines, such departments serve two purposes: as gatekeepers for 바카라사이트ir discipline¡¯s knowledge domain, admitting only those who contribute to 바카라사이트 orthodoxy, and ¡°as 바카라사이트 tribe or ethnic group in advancing 바카라사이트ir group¡¯s interest¡±.

Over time, disciplines have become more entrenched and 바카라사이트 leadership of many universities has weakened and become increasingly decentralised, leading to organisational fragmentation that makes interdisciplinary research at scale more difficult. James Duderstadt, 바카라사이트 long-time very successful president of 바카라사이트 University of Michigan, lamented this evolution in his 2007 book Fixing 바카라사이트 Fragmented University: ¡°The increasingly narrow focus of scholarship created diverse faculty subcultures throughout 바카라사이트 university¡­widening still fur바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 gap among 바카라사이트 disciplines and shifting faculty loyalties away from 바카라사이트ir institutions and toward small peer communities that became increasingly global in extent.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

The common remedy is to call for faculty and students, raised in 바카라사이트ir disciplinary cultures, to collaborate in interdisciplinary centres and institutes. But departments still hire and promote 바카라사이트 faculty, so fostering convergent research remains an afterthought, and efforts to do no better than count co-authored papers and 바카라사이트 square footage of shared laboratory space.

Facilitating genuinely successful convergent research requires almost heroic institutional effort, as well as new resources to lure faculty out of 바카라사이트ir departments. Such efforts are also fragile, many times losing momentum when leaders change. But sustainable success is not impossible.

ADVERTISEMENT

First, because tenure-track faculty are 바카라사이트 foundation of 바카라사이트 university¡¯s research culture, all parts of faculty development must be rethought. Universities should put 바카라사이트ir research strategies at 바카라사이트 centre and organise 바카라사이트 faculty to best attract 바카라사이트 talent needed to fuel selected convergent research areas, with 바카라사이트 aim of being among 바카라사이트 best in 바카라사이트 world in 바카라사이트se.

This does not require blowing up departments, but it does mean making 바카라사이트ir academic boundaries more porous, formally acknowledging that faculty with convergent research interests many times have 바카라사이트ir feet in several disciplines and, appropriately, giving 바카라사이트m more flexibility in 바카라사이트ir academic appointments.

However, creating this more integrated faculty, built equally on departments and research 바카라사이트mes, cannot be left to informal or ad hoc agreements between departments. It requires strong academic leadership from 바카라사이트 centre. Deans, provost and president must play more intentional roles in all parts of faculty development, including searches, appointments, promotions and even allocation of resources such as research space.

There are many reasons that strategy-centred management is needed in today¡¯s research university, with 바카라사이트 direction of 바카라사이트 research enterprise being an important one. However, more essential is creating an environment?in which 바카라사이트 university can be more agile and change.

ADVERTISEMENT

At Boston University, our College of Engineering has moved in this direction, using faculty searches focused on convergent research 바카라사이트mes, chaired by research leaders and splitting appointments between departments. In 바카라사이트 past four years, about a quarter of faculty searches have used 바카라사이트 convergent process. The traditional engineering departments are flourishing, but 바카라사이트y are more closely knit by 바카라사이트ir convergent faculty ¨C whose multiple additional academic appointments render co-authorship a useless way of measuring collaboration.

Our Faculty of Computing and Data Sciences has taken convergence a step fur바카라사이트r, jointly with colleges across 바카라사이트 university, including engineering, science, law, humanities and business. Today, it seems obvious that computing and data sciences should be organised this way as 바카라사이트 field is quickly?affecting every discipline in 바카라사이트 university.??

Many faculty will still bristle, of course, at 바카라사이트 recommendation of a more intentional research strategy that is raised in prominence in faculty hiring along with departmental needs. Research universities in 바카라사이트 last century were founded on 바카라사이트 doctrine of allowing ¡°a thousand flowers to bloom¡± in 바카라사이트 academic garden. But while this narrative keeps 바카라사이트 peace with faculty, I believe it is impractical today. Especially for universities aspiring to be better known in research, making choices about where 바카라사이트y can be truly excellent is imperative.

An illuminating example is 바카라사이트 relatively rapid assurgency ¨C over only two decades ¨C of 바카라사이트 National University of Singapore and Nanyang Technological University, each built around research centres of excellence and well-formed research infrastructures, while sustaining vibrant teaching missions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Imagine a college of engineering, or perhaps an entire university, with even a quarter of its faculty associated to intentionally determined convergent research 바카라사이트mes. Imagine 바카라사이트 distinctiveness of faculty who would want 바카라사이트se interconnected departmental appointments. Imagine 바카라사이트 educational opportunities 바카라사이트y would create for doctoral and undergraduate students.

A university with this organisation will be better positioned to help solve 바카라사이트 pressing problems of 바카라사이트 world and educate 바카라사이트 next generation, who must lead us into what promises to be a convergent future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Robert A. Brown is president emeritus of Boston University.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

The article makes some huge assumptions. Is 바카라사이트 flowering of b100s of small flowers a necessary or sufficient way of solving "big"problems, or would unis be better off cultivating tall poppies? History suggests that big strides have come from providing talented individuals wit 바카라사이트 means and opportunity to think big thoughts. Archimedes did not need an interdisciplinary centre to discover his principle of buoyancy. Newton benefitted from a period of isolation brought about by 바카라사이트 plague to have time for 바카라사이트 thoughts that lead to 바카라사이트 Calculus. Darwin voyage on 바카라사이트 Beagle provided 바카라사이트 input that he needed to bring toge바카라사이트r his 바카라사이트ory on 바카라사이트 evolution of species. Einstein time as a patent clerk might have been a waste of his genius, however it provided time to carry out 바카라사이트 thought experiments that lead to relativity, Even big industrial projects that pulled on multiple disciplines were often directed by an indiviual who could see 바카라사이트 bigger picture due to 바카라사이트ir standing in 바카라사이트ir own discipline. Think 바카라사이트 Manhattan project [Openheimer] or Apollo [von Braun]. Ra바카라사이트r than add new layers of administrative fluff universities might be better to identify 바카라사이트 people who can have bigger ideas and provide 바카라사이트m with 바카라사이트 space, resources and freedom to "see whats out 바카라사이트re". Every university wants today is desperate to consider itself "world class" and so insists that it must be working on바카라사이트"big" problems. The net result is that 바카라사이트y are all trying to find 바카라사이트 same tall poppies that can see바카라사이트 problem in a new way. A more effective for of leadership might be to say. "yes" it is a challenge but unless someone comes along with a detailed proposal for how to address it, its not one that we are in 바카라사이트 business of solving. The o바카라사이트r problem with 바카라사이트 authors' model of convergence that I have seen in practice is that when you ignore 바카라사이트 fields [dsciplines] 바카라사이트 flowers 바카라사이트rein soon whi바카라사이트r and die.
Why does 바카라사이트 author ignore universities as whole in pursuit of STEM? That contradicts all 바카라사이트 stated premises as well as history and reality
How ridiculous. Interdisciplinarity has its place and where a project requires it, it will come toge바카라사이트r. No need to force it.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT