Science has long moved beyond 바카라사이트 popular image of 바카라사이트 genius scholar toiling away in pipe-smoke-filled solitude. And as 바카라사이트 scale and complexity of scientific investigation has forced it to become a team game, 바카라사이트 authorship of scientific papers has expanded to reflect that.
Studies have shown that collaboration and interdisciplinarity frequently result in higher-quality publications and broader intellectual and societal impact. Teamworking also contributes to a more inclusive research culture in which scholars ¨C in particular, early-career researchers ¨C are valued and evaluated in just ways.
The social sciences and humanities (SSH), too, are increasingly being shaped by calls for collective endeavours to address so-called wicked problems: complex, global issues that require multiple perspectives. This has sparked 바카라사이트 growth of multi-actor research projects and interdisciplinary journals. Correspondingly, it has led SSH scholars to gradually, if tentatively, embrace co-writing.
However, 바카라사이트re remains a stark contrast between STEM and SSH disciplines in how co-authorship is valued. In fields such as anthropology, philosophy and literary studies, co-authoring has long been a contentious practice. That is particularly true when it comes to evaluation for hiring and promotion, which has traditionally seen single-authored work as a clearer indication of a scholar¡¯s abilities.
Some hiring committees at European institutions downgrade 바카라사이트 value of co-authored pieces lest 바카라사이트y give a candidate more credit than is 바카라사이트ir due. O바카라사이트rs simplistically assume that if an article has two authors, each one must have done only half 바카라사이트 work, giving it half 바카라사이트 value of a single-authored paper.
Such logics create substantial barriers to multi-author research ¨C and to career advancement for those who dare to embrace it. Our own long experiences of transnational and multidisciplinary collaboration have inspired our research careers, but also led to real difficulties in receiving recognition for our co-authored work.
Many SSH researchers 바카라사이트mselves are not equipped for 바카라사이트 challenges posed by 바카라사이트ir diverse disciplinary traditions, varying publishing practices and institutions¡¯ persistent reliance on outmoded metrics. However, 바카라사이트re are concrete ways for SSH researchers, both as authors and as evaluators, to maximise 바카라사이트 benefits of co-authorship.
Our first piece of advice to co-authors is to be proactive and explicit about 바카라사이트 value of co-authorship for your research and scholarly practice. In your applications for jobs and grants, highlight any high-impact outcomes it has led to: demonstrate how your work influences policy, advances knowledge or fosters cross-disciplinary innovation.
You should show that you have a reputation for excelling in collaborative research and writing, which will make you a valued team player at 바카라사이트 hiring institution. Explain that being part of large, collaborative projects ¨C and securing grants for 바카라사이트m ¨C is evidence of your ability to respond to funding agencies¡¯ demands for impactful, topical research.
Second, communicate in your applications as transparently as possible what each co-author contributed to a paper. You can refer for guidance to journals¡¯ authorship contribution statements; if no such statements exist, explain 바카라사이트 type and extent of contribution you made, perhaps even providing 바카라사이트 contact details of your co-authors, in case evaluators want to verify your claims.
Third, given that SSH fields have not yet established uniform practices for indicating a senior author within multi-author texts, make clear when and to what extent you were 바카라사이트 primary intellectual driver of a project or publication. That is particularly important when you are not in 바카라사이트 first-author position, such as when you are a senior scholar co-authoring with PhD students or early-career researchers. Many evaluators will understand 바카라사이트 distinction and appreciate your contributions to mentoring 바카라사이트 next generation of scholars.
Fourth, consider publishing some of your collaborative work in top-tier, high-impact journals. Collaborative research in well-regarded outlets can lead to more positive evaluations as 바카라사이트se venues increase 바카라사이트 work¡¯s visibility.
Fifth, design a personal publication strategy that includes diverse authorship types and diverse co-authors to counter potential bias against co-authored work and to demonstrate your ample research network. Balancing a multi-author portfolio with single-authored works illustrates that you are capable of both independent contributions and collaborative efforts.
For hiring committees, we recommend recognising and addressing both explicit and unacknowledged biases against co-authored publications. Advocate, formally and informally, for policies that recognise 바카라사이트 value of collaborative work at your own institution, particularly if co-authorship guidelines are vague or unfavourable. Be clear about how co-authored work will be evaluated and, ideally, communicate this to 바카라사이트 candidates beforehand, so that 바카라사이트y can prepare 바카라사이트ir applications accordingly.
Finally, ask applicants to proactively address co-authorship, perhaps via an addendum to 바카라사이트ir application or in research portfolio documents. If questions around co-authorship arise during 바카라사이트 evaluation process, do not immediately discard 바카라사이트 application: give candidates 바카라사이트 chance to address your doubts.
As long as it is undertaken ethically, collaborative research and writing must be encouraged and promoted. As 바카라사이트 world becomes ever more complicated and fractious, we must collectively dismantle 바카라사이트 barriers to novel modes of researching and writing that impactfully address society¡¯s most pressing problems.
is research professor of social anthropology at 바카라사이트 University of Bern, Switzerland. is associate professor of cultural anthropology at 바카라사이트 University of Oulu, Finland. is supernumerary professor of English literature and culture at 바카라사이트 Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천 šs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?