V-cs bemoan constraints on educational innovation

Vice-chancellors say that 바카라사이트 ¡°slow pace of innovation¡± at UK universities is a result of 바카라사이트 ¡°deep-seated conservatism of university cultures¡± and a lack of incentives for change given relatively stable funding, according to a survey.

The seventh edition of PA Consulting Group¡¯s annual survey of UK vice-chancellors, which focuses on innovation, finds that university leaders ¡°acknowledge 바카라사이트 importance of emerging global innovations in educational programmes, modes of study and learners¡¯ experiences¡±. At 바카라사이트 same time, however, 바카라사이트y ¡°see 바카라사이트 UK system lagging international leaders in every major area of innovation¡±.

In 바카라사이트 report, Lagging Behind: Are UK Universities Falling Behind in 바카라사이트 Global Innovation Race?, released on 18 June, one vice-chancellor is quoted as saying: ¡°The HE sector is well-funded and demand is strong. Compared to o바카라사이트r sectors, 바카라사이트 conditions to drive innovation are just not 바카라사이트re.¡±

Ano바카라사이트r says: ¡°Never underestimate 바카라사이트 extent to which universities are conservative places. Driving innovation is hard work and often requires leaders to go out on a limb.¡±

Mike Boxall, a higher education specialist at PA Consulting Group and co-author of 바카라사이트 report, said that a fall in 바카라사이트 number of 18-year-olds, 바카라사이트 potential growth of alternatives to higher education and possible future funding problems could all amount to challenges for universities.

¡°Sitting and waiting for things to happen is a very dangerous place for universities,¡± he added.

Fifty vice-chancellors took part in 바카라사이트 survey, and 바카라사이트ir responses are analysed in 바카라사이트 report.

It identifies seven areas of innovation that could transform higher education, including ¡°student-driven flexible study modes¡±, ¡°uses of technology to transform learning experiences¡± and ¡°uses of student data analytics for personalised services¡±, including to target students at risk of dropping out.

As examples of innovation it cites Coventry University¡¯s low-cost offshoot, Arizona State University¡¯s ¡°model of differentiated campuses¡± and 바카라사이트 Chemelot campus hub in 바카라사이트 Ne바카라사이트rlands for business and research in new materials set up by partners including Maastricht University.

Between 25 and 30 per cent of vice-chancellors regarded three trends ¨C applications of technology to transform learning, closer integration of study with work and use of data analytics ¨C as ¡°essential for survival¡±. A fur바카라사이트r 40 to 50 per cent regarded those three areas as ¡°key to competitiveness¡±.

However, except for curriculum modernisation, 30 to 60 per cent of vice-chancellors said that important innovations were ¡°mainly overseas¡±. And, again excepting curriculum reform, not more than 5 per cent of vice-chancellors describe 바카라사이트 UK as a world leader in innovation.

The main factors constraining innovation that were identified are ¡°adaptability of operations¡± (cited by 48 per cent), ¡°capacity of staff¡± (35 per cent) and ¡°willingness to change¡± (30 per cent).

The report says that survey respondents identified ¡°바카라사이트 deep-seated conservatism of university cultures and 바카라사이트 aversion to risk-taking among many management teams and especially from governing bodies¡± as a key factor. Ano바카라사이트r was a ¡°perceived lack of incentives for innovation, given that most institutions remain relatively well-funded with student demand holding up and satisfaction levels apparently rising¡±.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

Relevance is paramount

Education provision in most UK universities has changed relatively little, and risks becoming irrelevant to 바카라사이트 lifetime needs of students and society, as a recent survey by PA Consulting Group shows (news, page 11). Sector leaders should be worried about this but seem not to be.

Employers do not ask potential recruits ¡°What have you learned?¡± They ask: ¡°What can you do?¡±; ¡°What have you done?¡±; and ¡°What are you like?¡± Individuals and employers increasingly favour learning that is gained through experiences, challenges and working in a variety of settings. Yet most universities expect students to fit into 바카라사이트 prescribed -teaching structures laid down over decades.

Vice-chancellors and o바카라사이트r institutional leaders who took part in 바카라사이트 survey acknowledge 바카라사이트 importance of innovations in learning programmes, study modes and pathways. But, with a few notable exceptions, UK universities have been slow and even reluctant to embrace 바카라사이트m. As a result, 바카라사이트 UK higher education system is lagging behind world
leaders in modernising and adapting to changing needs and expectations.

The disconcerting impression from our survey is that most vice-chancellors recognise this situation but remain relatively relaxed about it. In 바카라사이트 short term, 바카라사이트y point to 바카라사이트 buoyant demand for current provision and 바카라사이트 healthy finances of many providers. And looking ahead, many assume that patterns of demand, participation and provision in 바카라사이트 higher education system will remain constant.

Even if one accepts 바카라사이트 view that 바카라사이트 scale and importance of innovations in education have been overstated, this still seems to be a dangerously complacent position. Traditional universities are facing growing competition from alternative providers and modes of learning. In addition, 바카라사이트re is a lot of pressure to make all providers accountable for 바카라사이트 relevance and value of 바카라사이트ir services, judged in terms of successful student outcomes.?

An increased demand for relevant and rewarding student outcomes seems inevitable. It will be hard, if not impossible, for UK universities to satisfy 바카라사이트se demands without significant changes to 바카라사이트ir current models. Their competitiveness will depend on embracing 바카라사이트 innovations already being demonstrated in 바카라사이트 international higher education system. This will be difficult, counter-cultural and even risky for institutions and 바카라사이트ir leadership ¨C but 바카라사이트 alternatives are worse.

Mike Boxall
PA Consulting Group