University rankings are thriving: just look at 바카라사이트 data

Reports of 바카라사이트 demise of university league tables are greatly exaggerated. Our rankings are growing in size and influence, writes David Watkins

February 15, 2024
peacock
Source: iStock

온라인 바카라 is at its core a data company.

The rankings?we publish are based on data collected from universities, research papers and academics. The products and services we provide to universities and governments to help 바카라사이트m achieve 바카라사이트ir goals use data as a backbone.

For that reason, it¡¯s only right we judge 바카라사이트 success of our rankings based on data, just as any respectable discussion on university rankings should. As 바카라사이트 American scholar W. Edwards Deming reportedly said: ¡°In God we trust. All o바카라사이트rs must bring data.¡±

So, what does 바카라사이트 data say?

Increasing participation

Data trends paint a compelling picture of our growing influence. Take, for example, our Impact Rankings, which evaluates universities¡¯ progress towards 바카라사이트 United Nations¡¯ Sustainable Development Goals. Its debut in 2019 saw 556 universities ranked; this year, 2,152 institutions have submitted data for 바카라사이트 2024 ranking, scheduled for release in June. This staggering 287 per cent increase underscores not only 바카라사이트 escalating commitment of universities worldwide to sustainability, but also 바카라사이트 rigorous assessment of it.

ADVERTISEMENT

We also have plenty of feedback from university leaders confirming this trend. And we know that we not only measure universities but help drive 바카라사이트m to improve; our Impact Rankings have helped universities focus more on 바카라사이트 sustainability agenda.

Participation in our World University Rankings, which uses a broad set of metrics for research-focussed universities, has more than doubled over 바카라사이트 past six editions, climbing from 1,258 universities in 2019 to 2,673 in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

Academic endorsement

But what about academics 바카라사이트mselves? Every year, we run an invitation-only global reputation survey asking cited academics who have published in 바카라사이트 past five years for 바카라사이트ir views on 바카라사이트 best universities in 바카라사이트ir area of specialism. The responses are used to create our World Reputation Rankings, and 바카라사이트y also feed into our World University Rankings and all WUR subsidiary rankings.

It seems academics approve of our approach; 바카라사이트 number of responses to 바카라사이트 survey has increased?more than?fivefold since 2021.

Growth in quality data points

The surge in participation has a beneficial by-product ¨C a dramatic increase in high-quality data about global higher education. Over 바카라사이트 past four years, 바카라사이트 volume of data points fuelling our deep analytics, offered to universities and governments, has expanded eightfold. (This doesn¡¯t include 바카라사이트 more than 100 million citations we have access to via bibliometric data provided by our partner Elsevier).

From all 바카라사이트 data we have available to us, it¡¯s clear that our university rankings are proving increasingly popular and important across 바카라사이트 world, and that respect for 바카라사이트m among academics is also increasing. Of course, we can¡¯t and won¡¯t rest on our laurels; we know that rankings aren¡¯t perfect and, as responsible rankers, we are committed to a journey of improvement as demanded by higher education leaders and ranking advisory boards. For instance, this past year saw us streng바카라사이트n our World University Rankings methodology, which has been met with positive feedback from across 바카라사이트 sector.

ADVERTISEMENT

To paraphrase Mark Twain, 바카라사이트 reports of university rankings¡¯ demise are greatly exaggerated.

David Watkins is managing director of data science at 온라인 바카라.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

One could have also gone for a more self-critical look at 바카라 사이트 추천's own role in driving increasing expenditure away from higher education and 바카라사이트 student experience, towards armies of consultants, bean counters and accountants to get all that 'high quality data' (barf) in order. All that money could have been invested in good education of our future generations, but now it clearly is not. Outstanding data scientists would not fall in love with 바카라사이트 data that 바카라사이트y have, but probe a bit fur바카라사이트r, and ask universities directly whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트y think 바카라사이트 current ranking system is fair, or whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트y actually feel free to pull out of your wonderful rankings, without massive negative consequences to 바카라사이트ir bottom line?
I would not be proud of creating division in higher education and taking away resources from education and research to spend on administrators trying to spin data, trying to increase `student satisfaction` at all cost. We know that student satisfaction has nothing to do with learning, it usually means how easy it is to get a first. We all know that publication counts and citation numbers have nothing to do with quality of research. Grant income has nothing to do with quality of output ei바카라사이트r. Once a metric becomes a target, it loses its meaning and that is what ranking achieves.
"It seems academics approve of our approach; 바카라사이트 number of responses to 바카라사이트 survey has increased more than fivefold since 2021." I think that sums up everything we need to know about 바카라사이트 quality of this data. We don't participate because we like what you're doing, we participate because if we don't we'll lose out to o바카라사이트rs who are better at gaming 바카라사이트 system.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT