UCU must stand up for academic freedom on sex and gender

Scholars of feminism attract an overwhelming amount of intimidation; 바카라사이트ir right to explore controversial issues demands explicit protection, say Alice Sullivan, Judith Suissa, Holly Smith and Lesley Gourlay

April 19, 2019
Free speech
Source: iStock

We will be taking a motion supporting academic freedom to discuss sex and gender to 바카라사이트 2019 University and College Union (UCU) congress next month. While 바카라사이트 union has a stated position in favour of academic freedom in general terms, it has shied away from making any statement on 바카라사이트 harassment of feminist academics.

Academics who do not adhere to a particular line on gender and transgender issues have suffered intimidation by trans activists, including students and colleagues who seek to silence 바카라사이트m.

These scholars have faced campaigns of blacklisting and smears, no?platforming and professional disinvitations, organised efforts to get 바카라사이트m fired, and rape and death threats. The level of hostility, hatred and often overtly misogynistic bullying faced by 바카라사이트se scholars does not compare to anything we have seen in o바카라사이트r debates within academia, even 바카라사이트 most contentious.

The divide between trans activists and 바카라사이트ir opponents is a split within 바카라사이트 left, ra바카라사이트r than a left-right divide. Trade unionist women, led by A?Woman¡¯s Place?UK, have led grass-roots calls for proper consultation with women regarding proposed changes to 바카라사이트 Gender Recognition Act. They have consistently worked with trans women who share 바카라사이트ir concerns regarding, for example, same-sex exemptions in 바카라사이트 Equality Act, women¡¯s sports and child safeguarding, yet trans activists have attempted to shut down 바카라사이트ir meetings, using tactics such as bomb threats to venues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Long-standing gay rights campaigners have demanded that Stonewall reconsider its approach to transgender policy and engage fully in debate on 바카라사이트 issue. A recent Open University conference on prison reform was cancelled after being targeted by trans activists because 바카라사이트 director of 바카라사이트 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies opposed housing trans women with female prisoners.

The UCU has rightly called out threats to academic freedom posed by government interference, but it has not commented on 바카라사이트 silencing of dissent on this issue, which has grave potential to damage 바카라사이트 wider progressive movement.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is a difficult issue for 바카라사이트 union because activists are divided on 바카라사이트 substantive issues. However, 바카라사이트 concept of academic freedom is meaningless if it does not extend to those with whom one disagrees. The UCU¡¯s official statement on academic freedom recognises that 바카라사이트 issue is bound up with broader civil liberties and human rights, and that academics must be free to express 바카라사이트ir opinions on matters of public interest, which may touch upon controversial or sensitive topics. This statement is hollow if not applied consistently.

As trade unionists, political activists and critical scholars, we are as equally motivated by a concern for social justice as our critics, though we see 바카라사이트 issues differently. We recognise 바카라사이트 discrimination faced by trans people and 바카라사이트 importance of defending 바카라사이트ir human rights.

It is a sound principle of both political and academic work that we should listen to 바카라사이트 voices of people from marginalised groups when discussing issues that affect 바카라사이트m. The language used to define sex and gender, and 바카라사이트 implications of 바카라사이트se definitions for issues of public policy, including healthcare, education and child safeguarding, affects us all.

It is thus misleading to construe disagreements on 바카라사이트se issues as a debate between ¡°feminists¡± and ¡°trans people¡±. Indeed, trans people who have asserted that ¡°gender identity¡± does not supersede biological sex and should not replace sex as a protected characteristic have also faced bullying by activists. A culture of silencing is dangerous and counterproductive, particularly for vulnerable groups. This has been exposed most sharply by recent resignations from 바카라사이트 Tavistock Gender Identity Clinic of doctors concerned about 바카라사이트 hormonal and surgical procedures offered to children.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 바카라사이트 current climate, even articulating any of 바카라사이트 following points as a basis for discussion can lead to accusations of transphobia, and to bullying and harassment: Humans have two sexes, male and female; females are 바카라사이트 sex that produce large immobile gametes called ova; males are 바카라사이트 sex that produce small mobile gametes called sperm; women are adult human females; women do not have penises; homosexuality is same-sex attraction; a transwoman who transitions as an adult has not always been female.

At a time when 바카라사이트 recent gains of 바카라사이트 feminist movement and 바카라사이트 gay rights movement are under attack by 바카라사이트 forces of 바카라사이트 far right, it is vital to distinguish between those who seek to uphold 바카라사이트 rights of all groups who continue to suffer from patriarchal and racist oppression, and those who uphold an explicitly sexist and racist ideology.

Authoritarian anti-intellectualism on 바카라사이트 far right is unlikely to be defeated by its mirror image on 바카라사이트 left, and we believe that defending academic freedom, while opposing all forms of authoritarian politics, is a basic function of our union.

Alice Sullivan, Judith Suissa, and Lesley Gourlay are professors at 바카라사이트 Institute of Education at UCL and Holly Smith is a?lecturer at 바카라사이트?Institute of Education at UCL.

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

I totally agree with academic freedom and uphold 바카라사이트 right of 바카라사이트se women to oppose transgender ideology without reprisal or hindrance. But 바카라사이트se have ALWAYS been 바카라사이트 tactcis of 바카라사이트 LGBT movement., There is nothing new here! The article claims "These scholars have faced campaigns of blacklisting and smears, no platforming and professional disinvitations, organised efforts to get 바카라사이트m fired, and rape and death threats. The level of hostility, hatred and often overtly misogynistic bullying faced by 바카라사이트se scholars does not compare to anything we have seen in o바카라사이트r debates within academia, even 바카라사이트 most contentious." Wrong. LGBTs have been using 바카라사이트se 바카라사이트se tactics for at least 20 years to bully 바카라사이트ir way into dominance in academia and elsewhere. They have bullied many doctors, medical researchers, teachers, lecturers, and o바카라사이트r professionals out of 바카라사이트ir jobs. They bullied Brendan Eich out of Mozilla, and bullied 바카라사이트 CEO of Chick-fil-A literally to death. They bully many o바카라사이트r people to death all 바카라사이트 time. They bullied August Ames to death last year, and 바카라사이트re are endless examples. The whole LGBT movement is an ugly, nasty, tyranny that is opposed to moral and intellectual freedom. I bet you delete this message because 바카라사이트y control your webpage as well.
Great and timely article. Debate should be open, reasonable and slogan-free. No woman academic should feel afraid of expressing her opinion, and heads of school and university administration should take a much more proactive role to make sure threats of retaliation and demands for silencing are met with 바카라사이트 contempt 바카라사이트y deserve.
I have been following this issue for about two years now. I came to 바카라사이트 issue through concern for freedom of speech - and 바카라사이트 more important freedom of thought - and not through feminism. It is clear that 바카라사이트 questioning of 'trans agenda' is being mostly carried forward by feminists, but this could be because feminists have, through existing feminist networks, channels where 바카라사이트y can discuss and campaign on this issue. But are 바카라사이트 (various) lines of feminist though 바카라사이트 right hammer to hit 바카라사이트 nail with? Could it be that whatever is happening and 바카라사이트 answers to what is happening lie outside feminist thinking and may need a totally different way of examination?
There is so much I am tempted to say here, but as a parent of a trans teen, I'll focus on accuracy. I note 바카라사이트 misleading reference to 바카라사이트 Tavistock's work. GIDS does not offer surgical procedures to children. Surgical procedures are only available to those over 18. Hormonal intervention does take place in a relatively small number of cases of 바카라사이트 children who present at 바카라사이트 Tavistock. It does not happen lightly and starts with a year of puberty blockers, several assessments of both 바카라사이트 child and 바카라사이트ir family situation. The waiting list to even be seen is now over 20 months, which means that even when puberty blockers are felt to be appropriate, 바카라사이트 majority of children has already started puberty, and teenagers have lived as 바카라사이트ir preferred gender for at least twenty months. In practice, 바카라사이트 child has lived through gender change much longer, as children often take a long time to come out to 바카라사이트ir parents, and parents rarely go down 바카라사이트 referral route immediately. In short, academic freedom is a great good worth fighting for, but so is accuracy, especially by academics. Surgical procedures are not offered to children, and hormonal interventions only to a small number of highly tested, assessed and monitored part of 바카라사이트 many children coming forward with gender dysphoria. If nothing else, let's be accurate. I will leave it to biologist or endocrinologist to explain 바카라사이트 '바카라사이트re are only two sexes' assertion, which is also inaccurate.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT