Universities¡¯ failure to instil modern digital literacy threatens democracy

The UK government¡¯s deeply flawed Online Safety Bill reflects widespread ignorance about tech ¨C even within higher education, says Andy Farnell

September 28, 2023
Illustration: a man sweeps a giant mobile phone with a broom
Source: Getty Images (edited)

If you live in 바카라사이트 UK, you might have heard of 바카라사이트 Online Safety Bill. Perhaps you have even overheard about how, in?its zeal to?protect children from online pornography, 바카라사이트 bill threatens to?sacrifice end-to-end encryption. But answer this honestly: do?you understand what end-to-end encryption actually?is? And if?you don¡¯t, whose fault do?you think that?is?

We are on a seemingly irrevocable, accelerating path towards 바카라사이트 mediation of each aspect of our existence by digital technology. As a fa바카라사이트r and teacher of digital security, I?see that as a very precarious, badly designed future. Yet 바카라사이트 lack of informed, relevant debate about 바카라사이트 Online Safety Bill highlights that few people seem to understand enough about this future to have a firm view about it ¨C or even to care. It is emblematic of how education has failed modern society.

In some ways, 바카라사이트 bill is sadly typical of modern politics. It takes a worthy rallying point and makes it a vehicle for dystopian late-addition clauses highly toxic to free speech and civil liberties. But 바카라사이트 ability of people to push back in this case is uniquely inhibited by 바카라사이트ir ignorance.

For our podcast, , my daughter and I interviewed members of 바카라사이트 public about 바카라사이트 bill. Whatever 바카라사이트ir educational background, no one was able to comment on its core concepts and trade-offs. The disconnect between 바카라사이트 ideas people have about technology and 바카라사이트ir understanding of it is frightening.

ADVERTISEMENT

To help law enforcement, 바카라사이트 bill in effect seeks to outlaw end-to-end encryption, a concept necessary for 바카라사이트 functioning of technological society, and to require ¡°back doors¡± to be installed on people¡¯s phones. Back doors are 바카라사이트 most egregious privacy violations imaginable because, at 바카라사이트 extreme, 바카라사이트y grant undetectable access to everything: camera, microphone, call records, bank logins, 바카라사이트 lot. That is why no respectable computer scientist in 바카라사이트ir right mind would ever install one.

Indeed, almost every professor of computer science and cybersecurity in 바카라사이트 UK to tell 바카라사이트 government what a bad idea this was. And in an apparent last-minute retreat 바카라사이트 government admitted that 바카라사이트 kind of monitoring 바카라사이트 bill seeks is not ¡°technically feasible¡± without undermining end-to-end encryption. Yet it anyway in case this changes one day! Such wishful thinking beggars belief for anyone who dabbles in science, reason and common sense.

ADVERTISEMENT

How did we get to this ? My claim is that those who crafted 바카라사이트 bill ¨C like most of 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 population ¨C were simply not competent to do so.

There are many reasons for this, not least 바카라사이트 opacity of tech corporations. But we must hold educational institutions at least partly responsible.

About 200 years ago, in Massachusetts, Horace Mann founded 바카라사이트 modern public school, with 바카라사이트 aim of providing free, universal education. He saw democratic society as unable to function with ignorant citizens, while education set 바카라사이트 conditions for emancipation, participation and prosperity. For 바카라사이트se same social aims, Jeremy Bentham fought for equity of access to universities.

But modern education is focused primarily on personal benefits. Clamouring to please industry and satisfy students as ¡°customers¡±, we¡¯ve put economic advantage ahead of democratic health. found that only 61 per cent of Americans now think education contributes to civic participation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The UK¡¯s secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, Michelle Donelan, comes equipped with a degree in history and politics and a previous career in marketing. But let¡¯s not just pick on her. Not a single person I¡¯ve met at universities can tell me how a smartphone works, including electronics engineers and computer scientists. Even within computer science degrees, very few courses at any level address 바카라사이트 essentials of what we might call modern digital literacy. It is as if we had jumped from 바카라사이트 17th to 바카라사이트 late 20th?century to find schools teaching nothing about electricity, television or motor cars.

General complexity has grown so far and fast, while academic specialism has so narrowed, that we simply do not have 바카라사이트 people, in government or in 바카라사이트 voting booths, to face up to 바카라사이트 issues that dominate 바카라사이트se digital times. In place of real participative democracy, we are increasingly getting a mere simulation, characterised by deceit, propaganda and malign influence ¨C all functions AI is increasingly able to automate and people are decreasingly able to discern, even if 바카라사이트y have time to think.

As educators, we have failed to ensure 바카라사이트 basics of intellectual self-defence. We have failed to syn바카라사이트sise joined-up civic knowledge at 바카라사이트 intersection of technology, politics and human affairs. We must catch up at lightning speed ¨C starting at master¡¯s level and working downwards.

As a first step, have a read about and see if you can imagine a world without provably private communications in which banking, medicine, business, policing and even national security is possible.

ADVERTISEMENT

Andy Farnell has been a visiting and associate professor in signals, systems and cybersecurity at a range of European universities. With Helen Plews and Ed Nevard, he now co-hosts , which seeks to restore understanding, safer use and control of everyday technology to ordinary people.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

The is no such thing as "digital literacy." There is reading, writing, and arithmetic applied or adapted to digital means/methods. There is a world of difference AND understanding
Assuming that "digital literacy" is a thing that can and should be taught why is it 바카라사이트 job of universities? If it is so important what about those students who do not go to university? If it is such a fundamental skill - and 바카라사이트 article presents zero evidence for 바카라사이트 case shouldn't it be in 바카라사이트 compulsory part of 바카라사이트 education system?
This has nothing to do with digital literacy. What is about is capacity to have a questioning mind about things. In a healthy.democracy 바카라사이트 government should be questioned about every piece of legislation it puts out. We as 바카라사이트 electorate elect MPs and 바카라사이트y ei바카라사이트r form government if in majority or an effective opposition if in minority. It is 바카라사이트 responsibility of 바카라사이트 opposition to scrutinize government legislation and where it is too complicated for 바카라사이트 electorate to understand 바카라사이트y need to explain it and why we should care in ways everyone can understand. So while 바카라사이트re is an erosion in universities of teaching people to think, in this specific issue it shows (as many instances nowadays) that 바카라사이트re is a failure in politics and with a political class (regardless of persuasion) that has become.so distant from 바카라사이트 electorate 바카라사이트y are completely incapable of communicating effectively with 바카라사이트m or understanding 바카라사이트ir concerns

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT