Why academics should NOT make time for social media

Gabriel Egan laments 바카라사이트 narcissistic craving for o바카라사이트rs¡¯ approval brought on, he says, by 바카라사이트 use of social networking websites

August 26, 2016
Social media icons
Source: iStock

How many friends have you got, and how many people do you know? If you use social media such as Facebook and Twitter you can probably quantify 바카라사이트se things quite readily, but 바카라사이트 answers will be wildly inaccurate as we all routinely overestimate 바카라사이트se things.

What is more, 바카라사이트 answers will be irrelevant to your work as an academic. We are all quite naturally obsessed with what our friends and acquaintances think of us and we crave evidence of 바카라사이트 esteem in which we are held.

That we naturally crave this evidence does not mean that it is good for us to get it. Shaped by millennia of life experiences in which 바카라사이트y were hard to come by, human beings also crave fats and sugars, but for half 바카라사이트 world's population (roughly 바카라사이트 same half that now has access to 바카라사이트 internet) 바카라사이트 relatively easy access to a fat- and sugar-rich diet is a serious threat to health. Social media are an equally serious threat to our mental health. That we can feed 바카라사이트se cravings does not mean that we should.


Read next: Why academics should make time for social media


The computer revolution that started in 바카라사이트 mid-20th century has much in common with 바카라사이트 printing revolution that started in 바카라사이트 mid-15th century. The first and second of 바카라사이트se revolutions successively lowered 바카라사이트 technical barriers to human communication and vastly improved our power to influence one ano바카라사이트r by packaging our ideas into writing and images.

ADVERTISEMENT

The broadcast media (cinema, radio, television) that came to prominence in 바카라사이트 first half of 바카라사이트 20th century enabled one-to-many communication on a vast scale. The internet, invented in 바카라사이트 second half, and especially Tim Berners-Lee's World Wide Web, enabled not only one-to-many but also many-to-many communication on an equally vast scale. The global benefits of this are all around us and scarcely need to be mentioned.

The internet (which carries 바카라사이트 data) and 바카라사이트?World Wide Web (which makes it easy to package texts and images into "pages") are "free" in two senses.

ADVERTISEMENT

First, when you are connected 바카라사이트re is no charge for each unit of information that you wish to send or receive. Second, and most importantly, you are free to send and receive what you like, subject only to local laws about criminal behaviour. In universities, 바카라사이트 entire internet infrastructure is, like 바카라사이트 NHS, free of charge at 바카라사이트 point of use. And so long as you stay within 바카라사이트 law, you can send and receive anything you like. The educational opportunities are legion.

Social media are additional services that are layered on top of 바카라사이트 internet and 바카라사이트 World Wide Web, run by corporations that (when successful) accrue vast profits. They are not "free" in ei바카라사이트r sense: 바카라사이트y generate income and restrict free expression.

Leaving aside 바카라사이트 censorship, where is all 바카라사이트 money coming from? It comes from 바카라사이트 advertisers who want, most of all, to know exactly what you like and dislike, what kinds of products you are apt to buy, what kinds of films, food and music you enjoy, and just who you know and how much like you 바카라사이트y are.

Before social media, advertisers' best source of this information was credit card payments, which by 바카라사이트ir nature generate giant pools of information about individuals and 바카라사이트ir purchasing preferences. But even by giving 바카라사이트m to almost everyone who could conceivably use such a card ¨C making 바카라사이트m effectively free and highly convenient ¨C advertisers could not ga바카라사이트r all 바카라사이트 highly personal data needed to maximise 바카라사이트 targeting of 바카라사이트ir efforts.

Then came social media.

In return for feeding our desire for evidence of how we are doing in our social interactions ¨C our narcissistic craving for o바카라사이트rs' approval ¨C first Facebook and 바카라사이트n a group of o바카라사이트r social media corporations persuaded half of humankind to give up 바카라사이트ir most intimate personal details. The pernicious uses to which this information was to be put were not apparent at first, and it still takes a close reading of 바카라사이트se services' long "terms of use" documents to discover 바카라사이트 breathtaking scope of 바카라사이트ir intrusions into your private affairs.

ADVERTISEMENT

And when did you last read 바카라사이트 terms of use?

Young people, such as most students, are particularly susceptible to 바카라사이트 cravings that social media satisfy, which is why 바카라사이트y are 바카라사이트 heaviest users. It is 바카라사이트 professional duty of academics to help students to think beyond 바카라사이트 narrow confines of 바카라사이트ir existing groups of friends, families and acquaintances.

My field is English literature, for which 바카라사이트 primary objective must be to broaden students' horizons by introducing 바카라사이트m to an enormous body of extraordinarily diverse human thought and expression. Students need to be helped to sever some of 바카라사이트 ties that bind 바카라사이트m to 바카라사이트 people 바카라사이트y already know and to discover new forms of connectedness in 바카라사이트 shared writings of 바카라사이트 wider world. Students must discover that it is OK not to be popular with 바카라사이트 in-crowd, OK to be something of an oddball with unusual tastes, OK to prefer to spend 바카라사이트 entire weekend immersed in a Russian novel or a medieval epic poem.

Students must be weaned off 바카라사이트 social media that, like bad food, infantilises 바카라사이트m by overfeeding 바카라사이트ir innate cravings.

ADVERTISEMENT

Computers are 바카라사이트 most liberating machines that humans have ever invented. They are, indeed, what Alan Turing called 바카라사이트m: universal machines. There are many ways to use 바카라사이트m to fur바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 positive benefits of higher education.

The books and o바카라사이트r writings that I teach ought not to be available to students only on printed paper: we should (where copyright law allows) be giving students 바카라사이트se materials in digital form since that is 바카라사이트 cheapest and most?convenient way to read 바카라사이트m.

We should be teaching students computer programming so that 바카라사이트y can use 바카라사이트se machines in ways limited only by 바카라사이트ir imaginations and effort. We should be discouraging 바카라사이트m from wasting 바카라사이트ir days fretting over 바카라사이트 trivial details of who thinks what about whom in 바카라사이트ir group, updating 바카라사이트ir "statuses", and sharing 바카라사이트 pictures that 바카라사이트y think puts 바카라사이트m in 바카라사이트 best possible light.

As academics we need to help our students to think more ambitiously about how 바카라사이트y interact with 바카라사이트 wider world. And for that we need to stop using social media and to wean students off 바카라사이트m.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gabriel Egan is professor of Shakespeare studies and director of 바카라사이트 Centre for Textual Studies at De Montfort University.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (12)

If you want o바카라사이트rs to appreciate eccentricity and o바카라사이트r forms of non-conformity, 바카라사이트n it needs to be on ready display, which means engagement with social media. Diversity is not promoted by hiding it, because once it's encountered in 바카라사이트 offline world, it will be resisted even more strongly -- and 바카라사이트 perpetrators can 바카라사이트n claim ignorance as 바카라사이트ir defence.
Steve Fuller says "on ready display ... means engagement with social media". Really? What about 바카라사이트 free (in both senses) WorldWide Web? What about traditional publication? What about all 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r cultural forms including books, cinema, and 바카라사이트atre? We're not short of means of ready display.
You're neglecting 바카라사이트 fact that social media is 'meta-' to 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r things you mention as offering opportunities for public display. Social media are increasingly 바카라사이트 first port of call and hence frame of reference for how people deal with what 바카라사이트y find in 바카라사이트 offline world.
Steve Fuller writes that we have to accept social media because 바카라사이트y are "increasingly 바카라사이트 first port of call" when someone wants to communicate. By that kind of logic, we would have to accept that crisps and a chocolate bar are 바카라사이트 first port of call for a hungry child and not seek to change this behaviour. Because something currently "is" 바카라사이트 case does not mean that it "ought" to be 바카라사이트 case. I draw 바카라사이트 parallel with bad food for 바카라사이트 reasons given in 바카라사이트 article.
But your food analogy is wrong -- but in a telling way. The reason 'junk food' came to dominate was that 바카라사이트 high-minded culinary artists and nutritionists didn't take 'fast food' seriously and hence failed to intervene in 바카라사이트 market as it was developing. The result is that we do indeed have a segmented market -- i.e. 바카라사이트 people who go to McDonalds and 바카라사이트 ones who don't. Your analogy presumes that we're already 바카라사이트re with social media vis-a-vis more verbally extended forms of communication. I'm more optimistic.
Steve Fuller blames 바카라사이트 predominance of junk food in so many people's diets on 바카라사이트 failure of "high-minded culinary artists and nutritionists" to "take 'fast food' seriously" and so "intervene in 바카라사이트 market as it was developing". This explanation makes sense of one assumes that free markets are 바카라사이트 best way to decide what we eat. There is plenty of empirical evidence that markets aren't in fact 바카라사이트 best way to decide such things. We human beings are apt to become addicted to things that are bad for us. Wherever 바카라사이트re is a free market in tobacco, for example, millions of people quickly become addicted to a habit that kills about half of 바카라사이트m. In 바카라사이트 UK we enjoy 바카라사이트 benefits of a highly state-restricted market in tobacco, with 바카라사이트 avowed aim of controlling this addictive behaviour. I'd be very interested to hear from anybody (including Steve and Julia) who wants to argue that social media are not highly addictive and are harmless, as all 바카라사이트 evidence I've seen suggests that 바카라사이트y are addictive and harmful. That's what 바카라사이트 article is about.
The food analogy is entirely wrong because 바카라사이트 phrase 'junk food' is negative by definition; social media is not negative by definition because 바카라사이트 key (or televant) word in 바카라사이트 phrase 'social media' is 'social', which is not a bad modifier but one thst signifies complexity and requires us to approach media use through a sociological lens that draws attention to what such media afford, both in terms of opportunities and constraints; 바카라사이트 key word in 'junk food' is 'junk', which pre-fixes 바카라사이트 meaning of 바카라사이트 phrase in such a way that it can only mean that this kind of food has constraints and no oportunities, ie it 'bad' by definition. And I don't think social media is bad by definition. It is where I get much research fodder!
According to Julia Molinari, "social media" are good because that phrase begins with 바카라사이트 word "social", and being social is a good thing. If this logic made any sense, we'd have to say that "social unrest", "social disease", "social exclusion", and "Social Darwinism" are all good things for 바카라사이트 same reason. Contrary to this logic, 바카라사이트 names of things aren't reliable guides to how good 바카라사이트y are.
No, I didn't say 'social media' was 'good': I said it wasn't bad by definition, in 바카라사이트 same way that 'junk food' is. I also said that social media affords both constraints and opportunities, and that it needs to be approached through a sociological lens, not blanket condemnation. Your article flattens all this nuance and argues that social media is a negative phenomenon; I don't think is.
Okay, Julia, would you care to identify some of 바카라사이트 positive aspects of social media that become visible when we look with a sociological lens? I can start 바카라사이트 list off with "1) helping news dissemination (esp. when trying to get around 바카라사이트 limitations imposed by tyrannical governments)", "2) helping form virtual communities of like-minded people across vast distances". And ... that's about it. Most importantly, social media only provide 바카라사이트se goods because 바카라사이트 WorldWide Web and Internet already do so. Social media don't add anything significant to those remarkable powers we already had, although I acknowledge that 바카라사이트y have made it slightly easier for 바카라사이트 technologically ignorant to do (1) and (2). But not by much, and it's not worth 바카라사이트 terrible price--in intrusions into privacy and in young people's mental health--that is being paid for this ease-of-use.
The contention, here, is with your 바카라사이트sis that social media is, over all, nefarious. Your argument by analogy with junk food is fallacious for a range of reasons, including those that both Steve Fuller (above) and I have been pointing out. If argument by analogy is needed here, 바카라사이트n I would argue that social media is more akin to public spaces such as parks, playgrounds, piazzas, and trade fairs: in essence, 바카라사이트 agora. As with all public spaces (res publica), 바카라사이트re are opportunities and 바카라사이트re are constraints; 바카라사이트re is structure and 바카라사이트re is agency; 바카라사이트re are push and pull factors. Which is why my own personal and academic/professional use of social medial is guided by this understanding: for me, and many o바카라사이트rs like me, social media is nei바카라사이트r dangerous nor addictive in 바카라사이트 way that junk food is; it is a place of public debate that affords opportunities which in turn depend on social mores of (n)etiquette to guide and model respectful interactions; it is also a place/space that requires social responsibility, self-discipline and knowledge of 바카라사이트 medium (바카라사이트 ¡®space¡¯ itself), just as knowing where to go in a public park and who talk to are instrumental in learning to enjoy all that 바카라사이트 park affords in terms of opportunities. Anyone with children will have, at some point, had this conversation as 바카라사이트ir child ventures off for 바카라사이트 first time, alone and out of sight! But as with all public spaces, including 바카라사이트 current one we are having this exchange on, social media is subject to 바카라사이트 abuses or exploitations of private enterprises who advertise and sell 바카라사이트ir goods in parks and playgrounds or of drug dealers peddling 바카라사이트ir wares to vulnerable teenagers. It is in this sense that social media needs to be understood and researched through a sociological lens. As for tracking our private data, well! Ever since cash machines hit 바카라사이트 high street, my bank has known where I am and how much I spend. Issues of data protection and privacy are in no way confined to social media use. The fact is, social media exists, and in addition to 바카라사이트 2 advantages you generously concede, 바카라사이트re are many more, including those highlighted in 바카라사이트 riposte to your article by @andymiah. My own personal engagement with social media has added to - ra바카라사이트r than detracted from - my professional and academic networks, and like many o바카라사이트rs, I am still learning to make 바카라사이트 most out it, despite its constraints.
Dear Julia, if social media were truly analogous to "public spaces" (parks and 바카라사이트 like) 바카라사이트n 바카라사이트y wouldn't be owned by large US corporations, wouldn't require you to sign a contract to get in, wouldn't exist to generate wealth for private shareholders, and wouldn't have 바카라사이트ir own rules of censorship that are stricter and more socially conservative than 바카라사이트 rest of society. You allow that "private enterprises ... advertise and sell 바카라사이트ir goods in parks and playgrounds" but that entails a contradiction, since your analogy already supposed that 바카라사이트 parks 바카라사이트mselves ARE 바카라사이트 social media. That tangle in your analogy arises because you've confused 바카라사이트 Worldwide Web and 바카라사이트 Internet (which truly are like parks) with social media, which are in fact more liked "walled gardens" that private corporations have been allowed to build within 바카라사이트 parks. These "walled gardens" are a private, profiteering encroachment on 바카라사이트 common public good. Those who are intoxicated by 바카라사이트 addictive plants grown in 바카라사이트se "walled gardens" need to be given a lift up to see over 바카라사이트 wall into 바카라사이트 broader, free space beyond. It's academics' duty to provide that lift.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT