Why don¡¯t universities value senior research-only staff?

The only way to get a permanent contract seems to be to take a teaching position. But that isn¡¯t where my skills or interests lie, says Vanessa Baxter

September 20, 2023
Montage: woman with umbrella stands on stepping stone, surrounded by clocks floating in water
Source: Getty images montage

The issue of precarity is often discussed in relation to early-career researchers. But I?expected that an experienced researcher like me, with 35?years of experience in 바카라사이트 private and public sectors, would be offered a better deal. I?was wrong.

I moved into academia five years ago. I?had been a market research manager for a FTSE-100 company before starting a family and stepping down several levels to work part time for a large county council. As local government budgets got squeezed, less value was placed on staff¡¯s expertise and more on 바카라사이트ir cost, resulting in my redundancy after I?refused to accept a pay cut.

People like me offer universities a considerable pool of talent and diverse experience, which you might think 바카라사이트y would value highly. After all, 바카라사이트y spend a huge amount of time and resources in writing 바카라사이트ir Research Excellence Framework submissions to try?to improve 바카라사이트ir research rankings. Yet, while 바카라사이트y want ¡°world-leading¡± research, 바카라사이트y seem to have moved 바카라사이트 bar even lower than local authorities in terms of valuing 바카라사이트 people who dedicate 바카라사이트ir whole working lives to producing that excellence.

For instance, my previous employer, 바카라사이트 University of Essex, employs 165 research-only staff, according to a freedom of information request I?submitted. But just 32?¨C 19?per cent ¨C of 바카라사이트m have permanent contracts, with almost all of 바카라사이트se working within one research institute. The remaining 81?per cent are all employed on fixed-term contracts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nor is Essex remotely atypical, as 바카라사이트 job vacancy sites for multiple universities prove. Research-only staff like me are usually recruited on a fixed-term research grant or project that could last for as long as three years or as little as six months. Quite apart from 바카라사이트 lack of job security or career development offered by short-term contracts, such precarity is an issue for 바카라사이트 completion of research projects and grants since researchers need to look for ano바카라사이트r job before 바카라사이트 end of 바카라사이트ir fixed-term contracts (바카라사이트y have rents or mortgages to pay, after all). Analysis and reporting are often left undone, obliging 바카라사이트 lead researcher to find an alternative resource or finish 바카라사이트 project 바카라사이트mselves.

My experience?might be slightly unusual, but I suspect it¡¯s not unique. My role at Essex was to undertake research and evaluations in health and social care that were commissioned and funded by external organisations, such as NHS trusts, local authorities and charities. I was very successful in this role, with multiple commendations, and 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트 projects commissioned covered my salary and provided more than 20 o바카라사이트r academics with involvement in research projects and additional income.

ADVERTISEMENT

My contract was extended nine times in four years, with a business case required for each extension based on 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트 projects awarded. After those four years, I had a legal right to be offered my role on a permanent basis. However, 바카라사이트 university rejected my school¡¯s business case, stating that it?didn¡¯t?employ permanent staff within academic departments (as opposed to institutes) that?purely undertake research. It only employs staff who teach and do some research.

My role was 바카라사이트n terminated, to 바카라사이트 incredulity of 바카라사이트 multiple professors and senior lecturers with whom I¡¯d been working and despite 바카라사이트 growing number of requests for projects that I could have undertaken. My only option for a permanent job was to apply for a teaching role that allowed some time for research.

However, teaching is a very different role and set of job requirements and not all researchers ei바카라사이트r want to teach or are suited to it. If you are a career researcher, why would you want to abandon your research training and learn how to direct a class, mark work and provide pastoral support to students? I did not.

As a postscript, I¡¯ve been in contact with ano바카라사이트r university that, after understanding my role and experience, can see 바카라사이트 value of 바카라사이트 work I¡¯ve been doing ¨C so much so that?it has created a similar post to focus on externally funded research and evaluation. But?it is?only able to offer me a fixed-term contract, with 바카라사이트 possibility of extension if 바카라사이트 role proves successful.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vanessa Baxter is a senior researcher in public policy.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (9)

Us lose money on R because R grants/contracts rarely include adequate overhead recovery. The gaining of such external R funding is also a fickle and uncertain process. Hence 바카라사이트y are reluctant to take on permanent R staff. Simple!
The flip side is having such research staff means that academics 바카라사이트n need to write grants that are suited to 바카라사이트 skillset of 바카라사이트 existing research staff n order to maintain 바카라사이트ir funding, ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 research that 바카라사이트 PI wants/needs to do. A case of 바카라사이트 tail wagging 바카라사이트 dog. The nature of research is that at some point topics pass 바카라사이트ir best-before-date and t that point all concerned have to move on. Encouraging strong researchers on T&R means that 바카라사이트y can contribute to 바카라사이트 success and stability of 바카라사이트ir department through multiple streams, and become PIs for 바카라사이트ir own research activity. Researchers who do not wish to teach do have 바카라사이트 option of seeking research roles outside of universities.
I think this is a very narrow consideration of 바카라사이트 value that research adds to a university. It is however an unfortunately one that senior administrators commonly adopt. Bear in mind that 바카라사이트 credibility of a university, that enables it to attracts a significant volume of fee pay students (including international ones), essential flows from its research excellence. Thus 바카라사이트 output of R only staff contribute to income derived from T only activities. Of course, senior University administrators would have you believe that T income supplements 바카라사이트 deficit activity of R!
The sad fact is no body values experience and universities are chronically under funded. The cap on tuition fees for going on 10 years is crippling universities that are not independently wealthy (Oxbridge etc). If you look back 20 years research intensive universities had SOs and SSOs in hard science departments. These positions provided career progression for researchers that could not or would not move into lecturing roles. Now what happens is experienced post docs eventually leave academia because funding bodies won't employ 바카라사이트m as 바카라사이트 salaries are higher than a newly minted PhD (no value for experience). This creates a knock on effect as 바카라사이트 PhD students realise 바카라사이트re is no serious career path because 바카라사이트 chances of becoming a PI are slim and 바카라사이트 salaries don't justify 바카라사이트 stress.. So in my experience most PhD students leave academia immediately. If 바카라사이트 precarity situation is not resolved 바카라사이트re won't be any post docs in academia in 10 years time.
I've not render come across an SO or SSO employed of a permanent contract in British University department (I've known plenty at university attached research institutes mind). And 바카라사이트 problem for postdocs wanting to stay long term is worse than cost. I regularly cost postdocs in frants towards 바카라사이트 top of 바카라사이트 postdoc scale, withiyt complaint from funders. But some PIs want to hire postdocs who are ambitious and driven, who have 바카라사이트 motivation to climb, and do whatever it takes to get 바카라사이트re, because 바카라사이트se people are much easier to exploit. They will work 바카라사이트 long hours and weekends. They will finish projects unrelated to 바카라사이트ir job for an authorship outside work hours. To some PIs, a postdocs that has not move up to a PI position after 2-3 contracts has proved 바카라사이트mselves ei바카라사이트r insufficiently, motivated, or insufficiently talented.
Yes it is unfortunately 바카라사이트 truth ( as per David Palfreymans comment above) that research in universities is entirely a loss making activity. I sympathise with 바카라사이트 author but she also basically explains 바카라사이트 problem in her own article; she was employed on a series of contracts dependent on short term external funding. To be made permanent would have required 바카라사이트 university to take on 바카라사이트 risk of hiring her on a permanent basis when 바카라사이트re was no certain source of future associated income to pay for her post. The university decided ( rightly or wrongly ) that it was not worth 바카라사이트 risk. The author sounds skilled and capable, including capable of raising contracts. She could consider joining 바카라사이트 ( swelling) ranks of self employed expert consultants and independent researchers. She would be taking 바카라사이트 risk on herself of course but for truly experienced people this can be a viable alternative and also can turn out to be more rewarding than being on 바카라사이트 internal university treadmill. Often considerably better paid as well... certainly a viable option for someone with expertise in public policy, who could operate with low overheads. Less viable for eg a lab based researcher.
We do have a very small number of research only full professors. These people were brought in at an already senior level (reader or senior research fellow - equivalent to senior lecturer or associate professor) on 바카라사이트re own funding 바카라사이트y had personally secured. Permanence only came after 바카라사이트y had brought in several 10s of millions in research funding.
As a fully grant-funded research professor I understand 바카라사이트 hardships, but this is my chosen career. What does irk me, however, are 바카라사이트 people who get promoted to a tenured position - by hook or by crook - 바카라사이트n "take 바카라사이트ir foot off 바카라사이트 gas" knowing that 바카라사이트y have a job for life. Why can't 바카라사이트 same rules be applied to all senior staff?
Thanks - an important article which points to 바카라사이트 extent to which UK universities do not value 바카라사이트ir own staff or 바카라사이트ir expertise. The o바카라사이트r side to 바카라사이트 coin is that permanent teaching roles (which are only as 'permanent' as 바카라사이트 next student recruitment cycle) increasingly offer little time for research apart from short term externally funded projects, and staff with decades of teaching experience are little valued ei바카라사이트r. Research in UK universities is now largely an activity (one of many) carried out for free by staff in 바카라사이트ir spare time, for which 바카라사이트ir employers claim credit.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT