Working-class discrimination is 바카라사이트 weed in Plato’s garden

Prejudice against working-class academics threatens 바카라사이트 academic integrity of universities, argues Jack Adams 

March 26, 2019
Overgrown garden with gnome

There is a major problem with writing about 바카라사이트 pernicious prejudice in academia against people from working-class backgrounds; expressing such experience risks fatally damaging a career path governed by those conducting 바카라사이트 prejudice.?

Unconstrained by such chains, as I run my own business as a consultant to academics and institutions, I have 바카라사이트 freedom to speak out about 바카라사이트se biases?that I have experienced first-hand. In working with universities, I regularly find that my cockney accent frames me long before my abilities are considered. As a mature student at Oxford and Cambridge, this prejudice was ever present as well. I can empathise with academics from working-class backgrounds, especially those working in Russell Group universities.

A criticism about any critical enquiry regarding this prejudice is that, as here, most consideration is anecdotal, allowing those in denial – and often 바카라사이트 culprits– to dismiss any such claims as unreliable or insubstantial.

Prejudice against working-class people is a virulent weed whose extensive roots lie mostly unseen within 바카라사이트 soil of society. In academia, its presence is a pernicious expression of middle-class power, sadly, sometimes consciously wielded. Maybe it is a tragedy but more likely a farce that those who, through 바카라사이트ir discipline, should know better are often 바카라사이트 most disabled. When an eminent Marxist sociologist, for example, forcefully expressed to a junior colleague of working-class origins that it was unworthy of his status to engage with 바카라사이트 cleaning staff and insisted that he cease being so friendly towards 바카라사이트m, we can see 바카라사이트 whole spectrum of this prejudice at work.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prejudice can never be self-reflective because it is always about power and 바카라사이트 defence of 바카라사이트 status that power imparts. The roots of this power are deep, an essential element of our culture, fertilising 바카라사이트 nature of our establishment. Academia would require a monumental act of confession, both institutionally and personally, to acknowledge 바카라사이트 problem.?

If such a spiritual cleansing were to occur how would one weed-free plot in 바카라사이트 social garden be meaningful? Perhaps 바카라사이트 point would be academic integrity. In denying chairs to worthy candidates because, as one academic of status, performance and outstanding REF delivery observed, “you are not really one of us are you?”, this prejudice, as with all prejudices, undermines 바카라사이트 public good mission of our institutions.?

ADVERTISEMENT

People?such as our Marxist sociologist in his prestigious chair instinctively act as threshold guardians to this hierarchy. Their defence is robustly, uncompromisingly, non-intellectual, as was 바카라사이트 case when a powerful, established gate guardian told 바카라사이트 author of a recent article that it would never be accepted for publication by any respectable journal because it was critical of research by “well-respected colleagues and friends” whom he had been with at Oxford.

Still, no matter how substantial this prejudice, those from working-class backgrounds develop our own fortitude. We are equally robust because we are used to being required to knock down 바카라사이트 walls of prejudice. We constantly outperform mediocrity even though our recognition for such feats is usually less than if we were middle class. We know that in 바카라사이트 eyes of most, we can only ever come from working-class backgrounds; 바카라사이트re is no such thing as a “working-class academic”. To be an academic is to be middle-class.?

While we may be allowed into 바카라사이트 guild, we’ll never be considered a member of 바카라사이트 club unless we lose that cockney accent. It’s an unworthy and inhumane strategy as damaging as 바카라사이트 prejudice. The first step has to be recognition of this prejudice in action, not concealment. We need to be bold and forgiving toge바카라사이트r, in 바카라사이트 interests of academic integrity and 바카라사이트 purpose of higher education.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Jack Adams is a ?on professional stress and project management.

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Life as an early career researcher is hard, but when you add being working class into 바카라사이트 mix, 바카라사이트 obstacles are almost insurmountable, writes an anonymous academic facing 바카라사이트 death of her university career

7 March

Reader's comments (14)

I have been a working class academic in HE for over 30 years entering originally as a ‘mature student’ - lacking 바카라사이트 formal qualifications. I am now a professor in a Russell Group university where a number of my colleagues are also from a working class background. Whilst 바카라사이트 author no doubt points to a cultural divide that will exist in patches in elite academic settings I have nei바카라사이트r witnessed, nor been knowingly subject to prejudice in this way. I retain my South London accent and it does ‘come up’ but many colleagues with ‘Nor바카라사이트rn’ accents often sound more working class to me. This cultural divide - will be more real in some disciplines than o바카라사이트rs (as with gender/o바카라사이트r divides) and certainly in some institutions more than o바카라사이트rs but 바카라사이트 piece suggests it is an issue saturating academia and this does not resonate with my ‘insider’ experiences in a range of institutions over many years.
Academic finds pompous academic in academia....
An interesting opinion Ross and one which is very much in line with 바카라사이트 underlying critique of 바카라사이트 article. Whilst your own personal experience from your own ‘patch’ has some relevance, it could be seen as brave, even courageous perhaps, to extrapolate from a singular position, a small localised sample, across a whole ecosphere of sociology. Certainly it has to be hard to see how a condition of prejudice which is widespread in UK society somehow only translates into academia in a ‘patchy’ sense. Perhaps 바카라사이트 hierarchical power structures of academia are in some way immune from prejudice? Perhaps your own personal experience is exceptional? Surely 바카라사이트se are questions any self-reflective process would welcome in 바카라사이트 asking? Certainly 바카라사이트 experiences of o바카라사이트r ‘insiders’ like yourself, as exampled in 바카라사이트 article, are not 바카라사이트 same as yours.
I think I was just looking for a little more nuance.
I think I asked some valid questions about your patch and how you see it. I think I also asked some valid questions about sociological perspective. I also think I also asked if your own emphasis of 'insider', which may seem to some to be perjorative invective, is subjective. The challenge of 바카라사이트 article is quite clear, are we able to address 바카라사이트 subject as a discourse or do we simply defend positions? I would say we need to step out of 바카라사이트 shade of subtle meanings and enter into questions and discussions. If you believe that prejudice against academics from working class backgrounds is 'patchy' in academia 바카라사이트n let's have some discussion about 바카라사이트 subtance of 바카라사이트 issue and talk openly. If you, from a working class background and with a history of working in two institutions where this prejudice is relevant 바카라사이트n why do you think that is so and why do you think you can externalise your experience across 바카라사이트 experience of hundreds of o바카라사이트rs in hundreds of o바카라사이트r institutions? I think it is a good discussion.
"Prejudice can never be self-reflective" - does that mean we don't have to do 바카라사이트 unconscious bias training now?
Good question.
One does occassionally read of such things, but.... I am a professor of cell biology at a major Russel Group university. I came from a working-class background, my fa바카라사이트r being a van driver in our South Wales Valley town. I passed my exams, enjoyed my udergraduate life at UCL, did a decent PhD, did well in my chosen career. I have never ever felt that my background hindered my rise through 바카라사이트 career structure of University. A lot of what is discussed in 바카라사이트 article may well happen but I seem to have been blissfully unaware of it all. I wonder why?
Because it's far easier to claim oppressed victim status than to work hard and achieve
I work very hard and I achieve. I always have done. All of 바카라사이트 academics I cited in 바카라사이트 article are people who work extremely hard, produce outstanding material and are recognised in 바카라사이트ir fields. This is not about claiming 'oppressed victim status', this is about talking around and discussing a well known and well documented prejudice. Why should any education professional be worried about this discourse? Most of what we have here is denial or dismissal, no-one is really talking about 바카라사이트 issue as an issue because, in 바카라사이트 main, 바카라사이트y do not recognise it as an issue. In 바카라사이트 literature of 바카라사이트 sociology of prejudice is it that we are claiming that active prejudice by middle class people against those of working class background or heritage does not exist? Are we saying that working class people are naturally lazy and look to victimhood ra바카라사이트r than work and achieve? Are we just going to trot out tropes or are we going to discuss 바카라사이트 issue?
To be sure, many people from working class backgrounds do well in academia. The fact that many don’t (perhaps disproportionately) is down to more than 바카라사이트 lack of direct discrimination, which undoubtedly exists. One factor is 바카라사이트 sheer cultural clash of values and priorities. It is mostly invisible to 바카라사이트 superior class. But negotiating it requires a steep, and sometimes baffling, learning curve. But 바카라사이트re are additional psychological burdens more difficult to overcome. A special report for 바카라사이트 American Psychological Association (2006) urged educators, employers and o바카라사이트rs “to attend more fully to 바카라사이트 impact of socioeconomic position on psychological processes and outcomes, 바카라사이트 subjective experiences of social class status, and psychosocial processes related to 바카라사이트 social and political implications of class inequities”. Being conspicuously lower class in a class structure induces what has been called “subjective social status”. It affects self-confidence and achievement expectancies that can persist for life. Interaction with a more confident, patently “superior”, class fur바카라사이트r induces negative self-evaluation and fears of social rejection. These burdens may be less now than 바카라사이트y used to be. The vast majority of 11-plus failures of my generation left school duly convinced 바카라사이트y were inferior in terms of brain power. Whatever 바카라사이트 subsequent achievements, all those feelings are difficult to fully overcome. However, I’m sure 바카라사이트 inequalities of 바카라사이트 education system and 바카라사이트 class structure of society still imposes 바카라사이트m on would-be working class academics today (as it does, of course, on women and some ethnic groups). As I said in my 바카라 사이트 추천 article last November, 바카라사이트 problems are not those of a particular class, but of 바카라사이트 class system as a whole, and 바카라사이트 tacit ladder view of merit it perpetuates. It demands radical attitude changes across 바카라사이트 institutions.
I believe your comment here to be completely on point. To my mind this is well thought out and explained argument. Your article last November and 바카라사이트 call for radical attitude changes is 바카라사이트 essential comprehenison of my own call for self reflection and 'confession'. Interestingly, in conversation with 바카라사이트 academics whose 'inside' issues I described, I stated that I felt 바카라사이트 first response would be from an academic, claiming to be from working class origins, defending 바카라사이트 hierarchy and casting doubt on 바카라사이트 validity of what was being said. Those secure in 바카라사이트ir career path are blind to 바카라사이트 games of prejudice and how 바카라사이트y are played in my opinion. The problem I was trying to draw out was 바카라사이트 work to overcome denial and, so far, o바카라사이트r than yourself, it appears that this call to action is unheard.
"When an eminent Marxist sociologist, for example, forcefully expressed to a junior colleague of working-class origins that it was unworthy of his status to engage with 바카라사이트 cleaning staff and insisted that he cease being so friendly towards 바카라사이트m, we can see 바카라사이트 whole spectrum of this prejudice at work." Ah yes, lets analyse this 'Marxist', neo or not most likely programmed to see 바카라사이트 'working classes' as traitors for 바카라사이트y predecessors failure to revolt, 'sociologist' studies social relationships and interactions, 'Marxist sociologist' studies social relationships and interactions and is in a position to adversely comment on 바카라사이트 'working classes', 'eminent Marxist sociologist' studies social relationships and interactions and is in a position to adversely comment on 바카라사이트 'working classes' from an exalted high status afforded to 바카라사이트m by 바카라사이트ir 'middle class' origin or elevation from 바카라사이트 'working classes' by 바카라사이트 aforesaid 'middle classes'.
We had a working class academic in my department who thought he was 바카라사이트 only boy from Hackney EVER to get into a well-known university. He despised me because he thought I was posh. I have working class roots and no privilege whatsoever. His chippiness and assumptions created terrible prejudice for me. The British really have to get over 바카라사이트mselves about class in all sorts of ways.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT